Immigration Judge Blocks DHS Effort to Deport Student for Criticizing Israel
US Attorney Asks Judge to Dismiss Indictment Against Steve Bannon
Jasmine Crockett Shows Just How Low Democrats Are Willing to Go to Attack...
FBI Releases Images of Suspect in Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping
Scott Jennings: Democrats Are Losing the Voter ID Argument
Guess Why This Kentucky Judge Gave an Unrepentant Criminal a Lighter Sentence
A Boy Has Stolen Another Girls' Championship Title
Dozens of Detransitioners Have Filed Lawsuits, and the Costs Could End 'Gender-Affirming C...
While Homeless New Yorkers Freeze, the NYT Wants Us to Know This About...
Sen. Warren Repeats Debunked Lie About Women and the SAVE Act
We Must Not Submit to 'Diversity'
Latest Leftist Stupid: Trump Abolished Second Amendment
Welcome to California: Inside CA's Homelessness Crisis With Nick Shirley
Trump Is Set to Make the 'Largest Act of Deregulation in the History'
Steve Hilton Isn’t Even Governor Yet, and He’s Already Exposing California Welfare Fraud
Tipsheet

Bioethics Professor: 'Why We Must Ration Health Care'

Professor of bioethics Peter Singer's recent NYT Magazine column did a tremendous service by admitting what we already know -- liberals believe that some lives are more valuable than others.
Advertisement


In his appropriately titled column, 'Why We Must Ration Health Care,' Singer writes,

"The death of a teenager is a greater tragedy than the death of an 85-year-old, and this should be reflected in our priorities."

... In other words, if you are old and in need of an operation, it may not be a good investment for our society to spend all that money treating you.  After all, statistically speaking, you're just going to die in ten years, anyway. 

And -- so the theory goes -- the money and effort would be better directed toward a younger/fitter citizen who can contribute more to society...

Scared yet?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos