Watch Don Lemon Shut Down WaPo's Taylor Lorenz Over This Take About Gaza...
Frat Boys Launch Their Own Intifada Against Pro-Hamas Radicals on Their Campuses
Pro-Hamas Supporters at LSU Didn't Know What to Do When the Fraternities Showed...
The Left’s New School Choice Playbook in Arkansas Serves as a National Warning
Americans Overwhelmingly Describe Trump As Strong Leader, A Stark Contrast of What They...
Democrat Accused of 'Deliberately' Misleading Arizona House to Host Drag Story Hour at...
Jewish Organizations Abruptly Pull Out of Meeting With Biden Admin After Addition of...
Supporters of President Trump Should Not Support Biden’s DOJ or its Dark Antitrust...
The Truth About the CIA
The Left’s Radicalization Of Our Children
Holly Rehder: The Only MAGA Candidate in the Race for Missouri Lt. Governor
RFK, Jr.'s Proposed 'No Spoiler Pledge' Is a Stroke of Genius
It's Time to Use American Energy As a Weapon
Why Intellectuals Don't Like Capitalism
NYPD Reveals Details About the 'Professional' Pro-Hamas Agitators Popping Up on Campuses
Tipsheet

Rubio, Duckworth Question NIH Director About Proposal Removing These Two Words From Mission Statement

Michael Reynolds/Pool via AP

The National Institutes of Health’s proposal to strike two words from the agency’s mission statement has alarmed a bipartisan pair of senators who are concerned the change could affect physician attitudes toward people with disabilities. 

Advertisement

In a letter sent to NIH Director Dr. Monica Bertagnolli on Wednesday, Sens. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) asked for an explanation for the NIH’s revised mission statement that removes the words “lengthen life.” 

In its current form, the NIH says its missions is to “seek fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems and the application of that knowledge to enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce illness and disability.”

“We write to express concern about the potential effects of this change and to request information as to why this change was made,” Rubio and Duckworth said in the letter.  

"Amid the rising openness of some countries, such as Canada and the Netherlands, as well as a handful of states toward physician-assisted suicide, we are concerned that eliminating the stated goal of lengthening life within the NIH’s mission statement without explanation or justification could have a negative impact on people’s existing attitudes towards the quality of life of people with disabilities," the continued. "People with disabilities deserve to be treated with the same dignity and respect as non-disabled people, but stereotypes and bias in the research and healthcare sectors continue to prevent people with disabilities from getting the care they need, when they need it. One survey found that over 80 percent of U.S. physicians who responded said they believe people with a significant disability have a worse quality of life than nondisabled people. Evidence suggests this could lead to discrimination in how doctors recommend physician-assisted suicide. With such pervasive, harmful views impacting so many Americans, it is imperative that the mission of the nation’s biggest funder of biomedical research be crystal clear."

Advertisement

The two senators asked for the motivation behind the proposed change, whether outside groups were involved in the decision-making process, and what effect the removal of the two words will have on NIH’s work. 

On Aug. 25, NIH opened a public comment period on the proposed mission statement, which reads, "To seek fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems and to apply that knowledge to optimize health and prevent or reduce illness for all people." While the statement has not been finalized, the public comment period closed Nov. 24. 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement