Chris Cuomo Had a Former Leftist Call in to His Show. He Clearly...
This Town Filled Its Coffers With a Traffic Shakedown Scheme – Now They...
USAID You Want a Revolution?
Roy Cooper Dodges Tough Questions About His Deadly Soft-on-Crime Policies
Colorado Democrats Want to Trample First, Second Amendments With Latest Bill
White House Religious Liberty Commission Member Removed After Hijacking Antisemitism Heari...
Federal Judge Blocks Pete Hegseth From Reducing Sen. Mark Kelly's Pay Over 'Seditious...
AG Pam Bondi Vows to Prosecute Threats Against Lawmakers, Even Across Party Lines
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fights Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Georgia Man Sentenced to Over 3 Years in Prison for TikTok Threats to...
Walz Administration Claims $217M in Fraud After Prosecutor Pointed to Billions
2 Pakistani Nationals Charged in $10M Medicare Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Charlie Gard’s Parents Denied Final Wish of More Time with Their Son in Hospice

Charlie Gard’s Parents Denied Final Wish of More Time with Their Son in Hospice

The parents of terminally ill baby Charlie Gard released a statement Thursday after a UK judge approved a plan in which their baby will be removed from life support shortly after being move to a hospice. The judge was siding with the view of the Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) in London that it was not in Charlie’s best interests to spend a long time in a hospice.

Advertisement

"GOSH have denied us our final wish,” Charlie’s mother Connie Yates lamented.

Connie Yates and Chris Gard fought a long battle against the Great Ormond Street Hospital in London, drawing international attention, to bring their son to the U.S. for experimental treatment. The hospital did not believe the experimental treatment would work and thought it would only prolong the baby’s suffering. The parents withdrew their request Monday stating that the window of time for the treatment had passed.

On Tuesday they asked to be allowed to bring Charlie home to die but the hospital argued that a hospice would be the best place for him because it was not practical for them to provide life-support for Charlie at the couple's home. 

Now it appears that they will have little time with him even in the hospice.

“We just want some peace with our son, no hospital, no lawyers, no courts, no media, just quality time with Charlie away from everything, to say goodbye to him in the most loving way,” Connie Yates said in a statement.

"Most people won't ever have to go through what we have been through, we've had no control over our son's life and no control over our son's death,” she added.

Advertisement

Related:

PARENTAL RIGHTS

"Despite us and our legal team working tirelessly to arrange this near impossible task, the judge has ordered against what we arranged and has agreed to what GOSH asked,” she said. "This subsequently gives us very little time with our son."

The hospital insisted in a statement Thursday that there was "simply no way that Charlie... can spend any significant time outside of an intensive care environment safely.”

"We will arrange for Charlie to be transferred to a specialist children's hospice... who will do all they can to make these last moments as comfortable and peaceful for Charlie and his loved ones," they added.

GOSH emphasized that "while we always respect parents' views, we will never do anything that could cause our patients unnecessary and prolonged suffering."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos