Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
Person of Interest Identified in Brown University Shooting
It's No Shock Why Enrollment in These Large School Districts From Foreign-Language Student...
This Is What AOC Had to Say About That Poll Saying She Could...
Venezuelan Navy Escorting Oil Tankers Amid Trump's Blockade Order
Guess How Australia's Government Is Exploiting the Bondi Beach Shooting
ABC Journalist Denies the Religious Reality of the Bondi Beach Terror Attack
Defending Education Files Civil Rights Complaint Against Seattle Public Schools
Jury Hears Closing Arguments in the Hannah Dugan Trial
Tim Walz Continues His Ignorant Crusade Against the Second Amendment
Defending Education Blows the Whistle on the NEA’s ‘LGBTQ+ Justice’ Indoctrination
Scott Bessent Berated and Harassed by Activists in DC Wine Bar Over Alleged...
Piers Morgan Blasts Candace Owens For Profiting Off of Charlie Kirk Assassination Theories
Texas Republicans Introduce the 'Sharia Free America Caucus'
Two Boston Store Owners Charged in Alleged Multi-Million-Dollar SNAP Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Did Obama Launch a Third War?

There's a lot of debate over the actions that Barack Obama has committed the United States military to in enforcing a no-fly zone over Libya constitutes a new war. Tim Carney of the Washington Examiner
Advertisement
poses a thought:

[M]aybe Obama doesn't think 112 Tomahawk Missiles and a pledge to shoot down Libyan aircraft flying in their own airspace counts as "war" -- in which case we have to wonder if we can ever know what he means by any word.

The Left has been curiously silent - outside of Michael Moore, who is of course an insane person. Indeed, partisan hack Jonathan Chait at liberal The New Republic denies the parallels between liberal humanitarian intervention in Iraq and in Libya.

The neocon model of standing up to aggression, while frequently wrong, is not always wrong. The model holds that dictators are like bullies, and if you make clear you'll stand up to them, they'll back down. Obviously, this way of thinking fails a lot, most notably leading up to the Iraq war... Opponents of intervening in Libya all seemed to assume that the threat of force would automatically mean employing force. This may not turn out to be a correct assumption.

The threat of force in Libya has turned into actual force, as Gadhafi has refused to back down. Now the liberal humanitarian interventionist Left has fallen back on a different explanation: it's easy! Far easier than the "quagmire" that George W. Bush dragged us down into. (This may not turn out to be a correct assumption.)

Advertisement

But furthermore, where are the crowds? Where are the protests? The Left was outraged that the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military force Against Iraq didn't explicitly authorize a war. This time, there's been no attempt by Obama to get Congress on his side.

I guess the Left will fall back on the explanation that Libya is not a war. It might not be, yet. It looks a lot like one. If ground troops are necessary (and both Secretary Clinton and President Obama have put that option on the table), will they need a declaration from Congress? Is it still not a war? Will we then be talking about 'peacekeeping' operations or somesuch nonsense?

Going to war in Libya may be the right idea. But the Left's twisting justifications in order to support their President leaves a lot to be desired.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos