Immigration Judge Blocks DHS Effort to Deport Student for Criticizing Israel
US Attorney Asks Judge to Dismiss Indictment Against Steve Bannon
Jasmine Crockett Shows Just How Low Democrats Are Willing to Go to Attack...
FBI Releases Images of Suspect in Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping
Scott Jennings: Democrats Are Losing the Voter ID Argument
Guess Why This Kentucky Judge Gave an Unrepentant Criminal a Lighter Sentence
A Boy Has Stolen Another Girls' Championship Title
Dozens of Detransitioners Have Filed Lawsuits, and the Costs Could End 'Gender-Affirming C...
While Homeless New Yorkers Freeze, the NYT Wants Us to Know This About...
Sen. Warren Repeats Debunked Lie About Women and the SAVE Act
We Must Not Submit to 'Diversity'
Latest Leftist Stupid: Trump Abolished Second Amendment
Welcome to California: Inside CA's Homelessness Crisis With Nick Shirley
Trump Is Set to Make the 'Largest Act of Deregulation in the History'
Steve Hilton Isn’t Even Governor Yet, and He’s Already Exposing California Welfare Fraud
Tipsheet

SCOTUS Agrees to Hear a Landmark Second Amendment Case

AP Photo/Seth Perlman, File

After a decade long hiatus, the Supreme Court has finally agreed to hear a landmark Second Amendment case. 

Advertisement

Cam Edwards over at Bearing Arms has more:

For over a month now, the Court had been considering whether or not to accept a challenge to New York’s concealed carry licensing laws, but in the meantime SCOTUS has turned away several other cases dealing with the right to keep and bear arms. Many gun owners had been growing increasingly frustrated with what they see as the Court’s reluctance to address the issue, even with what’s supposed to be a solid majority in favor of protecting the right to both keep and bear arms.

That frustration has likely turned to elation for many of those gun owners, with the Court accepting the case today and determining that it will decide the question of “whether the State’s denial of petitioners’ applications for concealed-carry licenses for self-defense violated the Second Amendment.”

That question is worded slightly different than the one posed by the plaintiffs, which asked the Court to decide “whether the Second Amendment allows the government to prohibit ordinary law-abiding citizens from carrying handguns outside the home for self-defense,” but the core question still remains: are the rights of average, everyday citizens violated by the state’s discretionary “may issue” laws that don’t recognize self-defense as a valid reason to carry.

Advertisement

Last year more than 8 million Americans became new gun owners, citing self defense as the main reason they decided to purchase their first firearm.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos