MS NOW Has Iranian Official Proving the White House Correct; CNN Panel Shouts...
China’s 90-Day Energy Trap
Iran Shows Why Louisiana’s Energy Industry Must Be Protected
Opposing Tariffs Is Not Conservative Policy
The Mother of All Shakedowns: California Reparations
Whose ‘Stolen’ Land Is It, Anyway?
Defense of Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea Requires Air Superiority
The Future of the Dean Dome: Tradition, Stewardship and Carolina Basketball's Next Chapter
Iranian Women’s Courage Must Not Be Forgotten on International Women’s Day, Part 1
One Historic Town Dismisses the Pledge of Allegiance
Pink Slips for DEI and ESG?
This Republican Lawmaker Is Reportedly Retiring After This Term
IRGC Operative Convicted in Plot to Assassinate U.S. Officials, Including Trump
U.S. Seeks to Seize $15M Allegedly Linked to Iranian Oil Shipping Network
Would a John Lujan Nomination Cost Republicans TX-35?
Tipsheet

Obama Administration Response to Russia Taking Over Syria: That's Not a Winning Strategy or Something

Obama Administration Response to Russia Taking Over Syria: That's Not a Winning Strategy or Something

In August 2012 President Obama drew a red line on Syria that he never intended to enforce and we've seen a landslide of consequences ever since. 

In the past three weeks, we've seen the Russians move into town with heavy military equipment, tanks, troops and weapons.

Advertisement
Russia has positioned about a half dozen tanks at an airfield at the center of a military buildup in Syria, two U.S. officials said on Monday, adding that the intentions of Moscow's latest deployment of heavy military equipment were unclear. Moscow has come under increased international pressure in recent days to explain its moves in Syria, where the Kremlin has been supporting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in a 4-1/2-year war.

The Obama administration's reaction? They aren't quite sure of Putin's intentions and officials have said this isn't a "winning strategy" for the Russians. 

"At this point, it’s unclear exactly what Russia’s intentions are. And we’ve made clear to them what we would like them to do, but ultimately we’ll have to see what path they take," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said last week. 

U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power on CNN over the weekend

Russia's military deployment in Syria to back Bashar al-Assad "is not a winning strategy," America's ambassador to the United Nations said Monday.

"Doubling down on a regime that gases its people, that barrel bombs its people, that tortures people who it arrests simply for protesting and for claiming their rights -- that's just not going to work," Samantha Power told CNN's Christiane Amanpour.
Advertisement

Oh really? And what exactly is the U.S. going to do about it? The answer is nothing and Putin knows it. Of course Russia moving into the region is a winning strategy.

This reaction is similar to President Obama's reaction to ISIS when he repeatedly said the terror army "has no place in the 21st century." Except for ISIS does have a place in the 21st century and their place is getting bigger by the day.

The same goes for the Russians. They're winning and they're moving. The Obama administration saying otherwise in an effort to look like they're doing something doesn't change that fact. For Russia, moving into the Middle East and particularly Syria, isn't about backing up Assad or even defeating ISIS, it's about growing Russian influence in the region and the world. 

I'll leave you with this:

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement