Arizona License Plate Reader Bill
What Investigators Discovered About the Louisville Plane Crash Will Absolutely Shock You
Appeals Court Just Handed the Trump Administration Major Victory in Mahmoud Khalil's Case
Are American Forces Headed Into Mexico?
Minneapolis Rioters Turn Street Into a War Zone While Stealing Weapons From Federal...
US Military Intervention in Iran Could Be Imminent
Florida Woman Tried Messing With ICE. It Did Not Go Well for Her.
DHS Releases New Details in Minneapolis ICE Ambush. Here's What We Know.
Senator Cruz Highlights Fatal Failures in Biden’s Afghan Parolee Program
Jacob Frey Just Said He Never Incited Violence Against ICE. Here Are Times...
Voters Rejected the ‘Values’ Minneapolis Democrats Hold Dear
Oh, Wittle Zohran Got So Mad Did He
ICE Deputy Director Madison Sheahan Resigns to Run for Congress in Ohio
Minneapolis Descends Into Chaos As Rioters Loot ICE Vehicles, Steal Sensitive Documents an...
White House Tells Walz to 'Resign in Disgrace' After Anti-ICE Meltdown
Tipsheet

Study Shows Ethanol Produces Worse 'Global Warming' Pollution Than Gasoline

Well, this is going to be a heartbreaker for the hysterical global warming crowd. According to a new study, emissions from burning corn are worse for the environment and produce more CO2 or 'global warming' gases than the burning of traditional gasoline.

Advertisement
Biofuels made from the leftovers of harvested corn plants are worse than gasoline for global warming in the short term, a study shows, challenging the Obama administration's conclusions that they are a much cleaner oil alternative and will help combat climate change.

A $500,000 study paid for by the federal government and released Sunday in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Climate Change concludes that biofuels made with corn residue release 7 percent more greenhouse gases in the early years compared with conventional gasoline.

The federal government has already dumped billions of dollars into facilities and programs producing biofuels in the name of preventing climate change but as usual, is having the opposite effect than originally intended.

Just last week, biofuel industry producers told the New York Times 2016 was the year they were looking most forward to bring cleaner energy to the United States. Oops.

Advertisement

“The whole purpose of the Renewable Fuel Standard was to encourage investment to create brand-new technologies that would help the United States become more energy-independent and use cleaner and more efficient fuels. We feel like we are just on the verge of doing that and now the E.P.A. is talking about changing the rules," Executive Vice President of the heavily subsidized biofuel company Abengoa Christopher Standlee said to the paper.

Al Gore, call your office.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos