Well... Well... Well... Guess Which Dem Candidate Ms Rachel Just Donated to...It's Not...
Dems Know They Probably Should've Kept This Poll Private, Right?
New York Times Puts Brutal Dictator on Its Fashion List, Then Quietly Deletes...
Skynet Panic or Power Grab? Bipartisan Bill Would Let Government Shut Down AI...
Appeals Court Rejects Trump Administration's Efforts to Re-Detain Researcher Over Israel C...
Ted Cruz Makes Interesting Prediction About Democrats in 2028
Thought Crimes Come to Minnesota
Long Island Residents Object to All-Boys Muslim Boarding School in Their Neighborhood
Freddy, Everyone's Favorite German Tourist, Bids America Farewell
The DNC Has Chosen Which State Will Be the First on the 2028...
This Is Who Mamdani Blamed for NYPD Violence
USA Today Stands by Nancy Armour's Ridiculous Caitlin Clark Column
Look, If James Carville Says So…
Trump Demands Key 'Reconciliation 3.0' Step Passed Before August Recess
We've Got Details on ICE's Latest Arrests
Tipsheet

National Geographic Teaching Children to Hate America

National Geographic Teaching Children to Hate America
Filmmaker Ann McElhinney has done it again, and this time she is exposing National Geographic and a new film shown in classrooms all over the United States to indoctrinate
Advertisement
teach children to hate America.




From NotEvilJustWrong:

In schools all over the US children are now being forced to watch The Human Footprint in science class. The film produced by the National Geographic tells the story of how humans impact the "natural" world. The subtext, and its not at all subtle, is that the impact (footprint) is bad and the worst offenders are of course Americans. 

The film contains the following statement.

By their first birthday, the average American will be responsible for more carbon dioxide emissions than a person in Tanzania generates in a lifetime.

This creates a clear impression that Americans are doing something bad. Children have been weaned on an unproven theory that man-made CO2 emissions from the burning of fossil fuels are warming the planet at an alarming rate which will bring about an apocalypse. The implication from The Human Footprint is that the US more than any other country is responsible for this catastrophe.

A number of troubling facts get in the way of this horrific scenario, many scientists believe heightened CO2 emissions follow a rise in temperature not the other way around and the warming of the past decades is minuscule when looked at over millennia.

Then there is the inconvenient fact that the temperature changes we are seeing have been seen before. They did occur prior to the Industrial Revolution, when they could not be related to any CO2 emissions from SUVs and coal fired power plants.

Despite this The Human Footprint goes on to point out, in all kinds of clever and emotionally charged ways, how awful Americans are for consuming and simply for being here and breeding. It also challenges children to come up with ways to counter all that bad behavior including references to population control and cutting consumption.

But lets travel back to Tanzania and examine what it means to have a small human footprint that is so praised by the National Geographic. I think it is not only disingenuous, is it also simply shabby education, not to point out that in the US people get to live average 78.4 years (and rising), while that number is as low as 48 years in Tanzania (source: World Health Organization).

Most of all, the teachers ought to point out that the reason Americans live so long and so healthily is because of those very CO2 emissions and because of their large human footprint. Energy is life, it is as simple as that and the abundant and low-cost energy enjoyed in the US allows people to live long and healthy lives.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement