Oh, So That's Why DOJ Isn't Going After Pro-Terrorism Agitators
The UN Endorses a Second Terrorist State for Iran
Jihad Joe
Israeli Ambassador Shreds the U.N. Charter in Powerful Speech Before Vote to Grant...
New Single Article of Impeachment Filed Against Biden
New Report Details How Dems Are Planning to Minimize Risk of Pro-Hamas Disruptions...
The Long Haul of Love
3,000 Fulton County Ballots Were Scanned Twice During the 2020 Election Recount
Joe Biden's Weapons 'Pause' Will Get More Israeli Soldiers, Civilians Killed
Left-Wing Mayor Hires Drag Queen to Spearhead 'Transgender Initiatives'
NewsNation Border Patrol Ride Along Sees Arrest of Illegal Immigrants in Illustration of...
One State Just Cut Off Funding for Planned Parenthood
Vulnerable Democratic Senators Refuse to Support Commonsense Pro-Life Bill
California Surf Competition Will Be Required to Allow Men to Compete Against Women
MSNBC Left Sputtering Over Poll's Findings on Who Independent Voters Worry Will 'Weaken...
Tipsheet

Get Lean: Obama's Defense Strategy Pares Down MIlitary

President Obama today unveiled his new defense strategy -- which includes a drastically cut budget for our nation's armed forces. He promised a 'leaner' yet capable military, to reflect the fact that "the tide of war is receding."

Advertisement

Just how much is it receding?

It seems we'll no longer be prepared to conduct two wars at once:

The new strategy, which critics will surely brand as a retreat, calls for being able to fight one major conventional conflict while conducting numerous unconventional operations elsewhere, such as policing actions, counterterrorism and disaster relief.

While I certainly don't want us to fight two wars, it's a bit disconcerting to think we're not capable of rousing ourselves on the chance someone attacks us while we're still engaged in Afghanistan, for example.

Indeed, Obama's defense strategy focuses on a tactic he's used over the course of his presidency: drones.

Cyberwarfare and unmanned drones would continue to grow in priority, as would countering attempts by China and Iran to block U.S. power projection capabilities in areas like the South China Sea and the Strait of Hormuz.

But the size of the U.S. Army and Marines Corps would shrink. So too might the U.S. nuclear arsenal and the U.S. military footprint in Europe.

Troop- and time-intensive counter-insurgency operations, a staple of U.S. military strategy since the 2007 "surge" of extra troops to Iraq, would be far more limited, with the force no longer sized for large-scale, long-term missions.

Advertisement

He's boosting our troops' numbers in Australia to counterbalance China, but Obama's reticence to have boots on the ground is clear through his greater empowerment of unmanned, computer-based attacks. Indeed, personnel numbers will take something of a hit:

Administration officials have said they expect Army and Marine Corp personnel levels to be reduced by 10 percent to 15 percent over the next decade as part of the reductions.

The Army's current strength is about 565,000 soldiers and there are 201,000 Marines, meaning an eventual loss of between 76,000 and 114,000 troops.

Whether the defense budget will suffer further cuts or not remains to be seen. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta allegedly was at odds with the White House over defense cuts this past summer, and is reportedly loathe to add more. Of course, that's all dependent on Congress acting and passing a budget to prevent automatic spending cuts -- and we know how well that's worked out so far.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement