Watch a CNN Host Lose It Over the Virginia Supreme Court Trashing the...
Cut the Waste. Not America’s Strength.
High Honors for the Left, Crickets for the Right
Sacrifice for the Cause
Coal Has Evolved. America Should Compete.
Applying 'Peace Through Strength' to Affordability: A Key to President Trump’s Wider Agend...
Reconciling America
Could Evil Netflix Still Devour Warner Bros.? Stranger Things...Has Happened!
'What’s Your Favorite Type of Abortion?' How to Win the Abortion Debate
Applying 'America First' to Avoid Moral Hazard
The CCP Doesn’t Need a Spy – It Just Needs Your Continuous Glucose...
Judge Allows Cameras in Charlie Kirk Murder Trial
Mexican National Faces Up to 15 Years for Running Alien Smuggling Operation Across...
Treasury Sanctions 10 Entities Across Middle East, Asia, and Europe Over Iran Arms...
New USDA Rule Will Demand SNAP Stores Stock More 'Real Food'
Tipsheet

Only 6.6% of EPA Employees Considered 'Essential'

Only 6.6% of EPA Employees Considered 'Essential'

As if we didn’t already know how useless and unnecessary the EPA is, following the government shutdown we saw just how little we really need them. When various government agencies were releasing many of their workers on furlough with lack of funding, the EPA went through its employees and decided which were “essential” and which were “non-essential”.

Advertisement

According to an EPA guidance, which Reuters obtained, the agency said it only had 1,069 of its 16,205 employees listed as “essential”. That is only 6.6 percent of their workforce! This guidance, which is used in the event of a government shutdown, also said that “most workers in the Office of Air and Radiation, which is in charge of writing and implementing most of the EPA’s major air pollution rules,” would be furloughed.

Why is it that we have an agency that could run on less than 7 percent of current staff? To be clear that means more than 9 out of every 10 employees at the EPA are non-essential.

Although this government shutdown may not be considered as the greatest way to get through funding differences, perhaps there is a silver lining here. When agencies are forced to go through their list of employees and whether they are integral to the organization’s work it seems we get quite a sneak peek into how we could gut and cut the government bureaucracy. Is it just me, or should all employees be essential in order to remain at their jobs? This could be a good way to go forward with finding places to cut money in the budget.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos