These Latest Polls Are Disastrous for Dems
John Cornyn: We Can't Pass the SAVE America Act Because I Want My...
'My God. Read the Replies. Horrendous': This Tweet Ends Fauci's Legacy
Democrat Who Begged to Kill Filibuster Now Begs to Save It From GOP
The Latest Winner of the British Citizen Award Makes a Mockery of Everything
The Fauci Diaries Have Press Running Away
Madison Now Has Its Own Autonomous Zone and It's As Bad As You'd...
Check Out Why Dems Wouldn't Let This Gubernatorial Candidate Speak at NYC's Dominican...
Tom Tiffany Slams Wisconsin Fact-Checkers Who Refuse to Question Francesca Hong
Francesca Hong's Campaign Just Got Busted for Lying About Her Views on the...
A Former Navy SEAL Was Convicted for Plotting a Terror Attack Targeting Cops
Guess What Happened to the WI Brewery That Vowed Free Beer If Trump...
Documents Show That James Talarico Used Mother's House to Break Texas Election Law
Iran's 'Attempted Surprise Attack' Against American Military Stopped
We've Just Learned More Details About ICE's Latest Deportations
Tipsheet

Gawker Goes After Meg Whitman's Children

Gawker Goes After Meg Whitman's Children
Over the weekend, a Left-leaning gossip blog unleashed a series of hit pieces on the sons of California Republican Gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman.

A Gawker blog post
Advertisement
, authored by someone named Maureen O'Connell, peddles an allegation that one of Whitman's sons raped a Princeton classmate in 2006.  The "report" quotes unnamed third parties as its primary source of evidence.  Implicit throughout the piece is a vague suggestion that Meg Whitman, a major Princeton donor, paid big hush money to make the issue go away.  The problem: There's absolutely no evidence substantiating the innuendo.  There was also never a criminal complaint filed in connection with the supposed assault -- perhaps because there's cause to reasonably believe the encounter was consensual.  The post also details other boorish behavior by the young man in question, who, in truth, doesn't appear to be a saint. 

A second post, also by O'Connell, asks "What is Wrong with Meg Whitman's Kids?"  This time, she drops major bombshells: Whitman's younger son was recently cited for careless driving.  Even more shocking, this same young man pleaded guilty to a 2007 noise violation, when he was an undergraduate in college.  The horror!

O'Connell proceeds to suggest Whitman is a bad mother:

A political newcomer, Meg Whitman credits her late political awakening (she didn't register to vote until seven years ago) to her busy schedule: She was "focused on raising a family." And yet her two adult sons have been absent from her campaign, perhaps because both boys have faced their share of scandals.
Advertisement

Let's review Liberalism's Official Rules of Political Etiquette.  Under the formula,  speaking ill of a political candidate's family -- especially his or her children -- is strictly forbidden.  In 2008, Barack Obama lashed out at critics of his wife, Michelle, calling the attacks "low class."  Ignoring the fact that Michelle was one of the Obama campaign's top political surrogates, the mainstream media immediately entered outrage mode, amplifying Obama's meme by tut-tutting that Republicans had crossed a line.

Whitman is discovering a major loophole in the rule:  The regulations only apply to Democratic candidates. Just ask Sarah Palin.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement