This Democrat Just Called Rape Allegations Against Graham Platner 'Shiny New Thing to...
This Taxpayer-Funded Museum Erased the Founders and Imposed 'White Supremacy Culture' Trai...
Socialists Won Big in New York and Colorado – Now They’re Coming for...
Democrats Defended the Indefensible. Never Let Them Forget It.
A Congressional Candidate Calls for an Uprising Against President Trump
Zohran Mamdani Calls on Graham Platner to Drop Out of the Senate Race
New York Socialists Are Not Happy With 'The View' Right Now
British Journalist Has a Message for Americans, Forgetting She'd Be Speaking German If...
Ro Khanna Made His Case for a National Wealth Tax. It Doesn't Hold...
President Trump Announces the End of Sanctions on Turkey
President Trump Says the Iran War Was a Test of Our NATO Allies—And...
Leftist Influencer Leads 'Down With the USA' Chant at the Ayatollah's Funeral
Trump Issues Major Spending Demand When Congress Comes Back From Recess
Bernie Sanders Hammers the Last Nail in Platner's Campaign Coffin
Former Governor Nominee Andrew Gillum Arrested on Drug Charges
Tipsheet

Gawker Goes After Meg Whitman's Children

Gawker Goes After Meg Whitman's Children
Over the weekend, a Left-leaning gossip blog unleashed a series of hit pieces on the sons of California Republican Gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman.

A Gawker blog post
Advertisement
, authored by someone named Maureen O'Connell, peddles an allegation that one of Whitman's sons raped a Princeton classmate in 2006.  The "report" quotes unnamed third parties as its primary source of evidence.  Implicit throughout the piece is a vague suggestion that Meg Whitman, a major Princeton donor, paid big hush money to make the issue go away.  The problem: There's absolutely no evidence substantiating the innuendo.  There was also never a criminal complaint filed in connection with the supposed assault -- perhaps because there's cause to reasonably believe the encounter was consensual.  The post also details other boorish behavior by the young man in question, who, in truth, doesn't appear to be a saint. 

A second post, also by O'Connell, asks "What is Wrong with Meg Whitman's Kids?"  This time, she drops major bombshells: Whitman's younger son was recently cited for careless driving.  Even more shocking, this same young man pleaded guilty to a 2007 noise violation, when he was an undergraduate in college.  The horror!

O'Connell proceeds to suggest Whitman is a bad mother:

A political newcomer, Meg Whitman credits her late political awakening (she didn't register to vote until seven years ago) to her busy schedule: She was "focused on raising a family." And yet her two adult sons have been absent from her campaign, perhaps because both boys have faced their share of scandals.
Advertisement

Let's review Liberalism's Official Rules of Political Etiquette.  Under the formula,  speaking ill of a political candidate's family -- especially his or her children -- is strictly forbidden.  In 2008, Barack Obama lashed out at critics of his wife, Michelle, calling the attacks "low class."  Ignoring the fact that Michelle was one of the Obama campaign's top political surrogates, the mainstream media immediately entered outrage mode, amplifying Obama's meme by tut-tutting that Republicans had crossed a line.

Whitman is discovering a major loophole in the rule:  The regulations only apply to Democratic candidates. Just ask Sarah Palin.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos