Time to Go: Police Begin Dismantling Pro-Hamas Camp at George Washington University
It's Not Columbia University, But It Doesn't Negate the Error These Pro-Hamas Clowns...
Excuse Me, Gov. Hochul, You Can't Really Say That About Black Kids
Dem Strategists Agree That Biden Is Totally Screwed If He Loses This State...
Of Course, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Found This to Be a Racist Conspiracy
Panama's President-Elect Vows to Close Key Migration Routes to US
COVID Subcommittee Asks Blinken to Declassify Docs That 'Credibly Suggest' Where COVID Ori...
Ilhan Omar Hit With Censure Resolution
'Incubator of Bigotry': Group of Federal Judges Tells Columbia They Won't Hire Any...
Vulnerable Dem Incumbent Sherrod Brown: Biden's Politics 'Not Much Different From Mine'
Here’s Why One Pharmaceutical Company Will Withdraw Its COVID-19 Vaccine
Emory's Jewish Problem
Georgia Court of Appeals Just Delivered Some Bad News for Fani Willis
New Poll Shows Biden in Trouble With Older Voters in Key Swing State
Why Is the Judge in Trump's New York Trial Muzzling a Key Defense...
Tipsheet

Sacramento Bee Editorial Board to Kamala Harris: You Should Have Known Better

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) accepted the resignation of one of her aides this week after reports revealed that he had been sued for "gender harassment" while working for her when she was California attorney general. The aide, Larry Wallace, reportedly harassed his executive assistant Danielle Hartley, asking her to crawl under his desk on a daily basis and to run personal errands for him. Hartley sued in December 2016, and walked away with a $400,000 settlement in May 2017.

Advertisement

Harris's office claims they did not know about the lawsuit or the harassment claims until recently. However, the Sacramento Bee poked some holes in that claim.

There are only a few possible interpretations here, and they are unpleasant. Wallace wasn’t out on the periphery of Harris’ staff; he was a senior aide she knew for 14 years — hardly a stranger. For Harris to flatly deny any knowledge of this settlement seems, shall we say, far-fetched. For the moment, let’s take her at her word.

A second and equally troubling interpretation is that Harris isn’t a terribly good manager, and that her staff was insulating her from information critical to the performance of her duties. This is hardly a propitious beginning to a presidential candidacy. (Sacramento Bee)

Harris has "fallen short" of her responsibility to lead, the editors conclude. She "owes the voters more than just a four word denial on the steps of the U.S. Senate."

Republican leaders were among those to cry hypocrite, particularly in regards to how Harris treated and judged then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement