The Video Speaks for Itself, the ICE Agent Was Justified
The Moral Blackmailing of the American People
Venezuela Freed From 'The Warmth of Collectivism'
Should Capitalism Have Any Guardrails?
Minnesota Democrats Are Testing How Woke Is Too Woke
The Uncontainable Embers of Iran’s Uprising
When Reality Triumphs Over Self-Destructive Kakistocracy
Tragedy and Reality
Iran's Theocracy Enters Its Last Days
The Supreme Court and the Coming Showdown on Men in Women's Sports
Schools Must Teach the History of Socialism
Should the US Intervene to Help Iranian Revolutionaries?
Hospitals Fight Trump to Protect a Cash Cow
Minneapolis Public Schools Reportedly Offering Remote Learning Through Feb. 12 After ICE S...
DOJ Sues Two California Cities Over Natural Gas Ban in New Construction
Tipsheet

Will the California Senate Approve an Assisted-Suicide Bill?

Editor's Note: A previous headline for this article suggested that SB 128 has passed the California Senate. It has not yet passed. Our apologies for the error.

Original piece:

Advertisement

California is one step closer to becoming the sixth state to pass the controversial Death with Dignity bill. The legislation, condemned by many pro-life advocates, allows terminally ill patients to end their lives with a doctor’s prescription.

The California Medical Association, which initially opposed the bill, removed its opposition last week. Soon after, the state Senate appropriations committee approved it.

Similar legislation was just defeated in Scotland.

The debate over assisted suicide reached a climax last year when 29-year-old Brittany Maynard chose to end her life after receiving a fatal diagnosis. She was one of 750 people in Oregon to do so since the state passed the aid in dying law in 1997. The four other states which allow patients to take deadly medication are New Mexico, Montana, Washington, and Vermont.

TIME magazine has a list of factors that explain the divide on the right-to-die issue. On the advocate side are reasons such as retaining one’s autonomy and establishing clear guidelines: “The laws give patients the choice to use aid in dying if their suffering becomes unbearable” and “States that don’t authorize aid in dying have unclear and unenforceable laws.”

Advertisement

Related:

CALIFORNIA

Opponents, on the other hand, argue the following: “Once the pills are available, anyone can administer them – particularly if that patient has lost mental and physical faculties – even if that patient has decided against taking the pills” and “It’s often difficult to predict which sick patient is going to die imminently, as opposed to getting better with intensive care.”

No one wants to see a loved one suffer. But, is there not something just inhumane about giving a patient the tools to end their lives? Don't doctors spend years studying medicine and conducting research in order to save lives? 

I hope these California lawmakers reconsider and follow Scotland’s lead.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos