Joe Biden's Political Aphasia Finally Presents Itself
A Palestinian Unwrapped a US Aid Package. It Didn't Go Well.
Netanyahu to Biden: I'm Taking Rafah, Destroying Hamas, And You Can’t Do Anything...
Nation’s Largest Corporate Mega-Stores Lobbying for Billions, Small Businesses & Consumers...
A Truth and Reality ‘Bloodbath’
CAIR Says Biden Will Lose, 'Allah Willing'
Israel As 'A Pariah' Among the Nations
Trump Romps Among Battleground Catholics
Biden's Speech Was Not the Win the Political Class Thought It Was
The Smell of Mendacity
'Bloodbath' and Pure Evil
Pathway to Victory
The Cautionary Legal Tale of Roundup
FDNY Won't Investigate Those Who Booed Letitia James, But Don't Expect Love for...
Joe Biden Is Back to Pretending His Granddaughter Doesn't Exist
Tipsheet

How The NLRB Is Killing Manufacturing Jobs

The United Auto Workers union may still be reeling from the devastating setback it suffered on Valentine's Day when workers at Volkswagen's Chattanooga, Tennessee, plant voted against forming a union, but the head of Volkswagen's 'works council' in Germany isn't resting. Reuters reports:

Advertisement

Volkswagen's top labor representative threatened on Wednesday to try to block further investments by the German carmaker in the southern United States if its workers there are not unionized.
...
"I can imagine fairly well that another VW factory in the United States, provided that one more should still be set up there, does not necessarily have to be assigned to the south again," said Bernd Osterloh, head of VW's works council.

"If co-determination isn't guaranteed in the first place, we as workers will hardly be able to vote in favor" of potentially building another plant in the U.S. south, Osterloh, who is also on VW's supervisory board, said.

The 20-member panel - evenly split between labor and management - has to approve any decision on closing plants or building new ones.

Unfortunately, what VW's German labor groups fail to understand, is that 'co-determination' between employers and employees is illegal in the United States thanks to the National Labor Relations Board.

In the 1980s, many U.S. corporations, facing new competition from Japan and Germany, tried to copy their foreign competitors approach to labor-management relations by forming 'worker committees' designed to improve labor-management cooperation and productivity. Management at Motorola, AT&T, and and some smaller manufacturers all tried to form such committees so that employees would have a greater voice in how these companies were run.

Advertisement

But, in a series of decisions starting in 1992, the NLRB found that these employer-sponsored committees violated the National Labor Relations Act. Specifically, Section 8(a)(2) of the NLRA prohibits the "formation or administration of any labor organization" by an employer.

In other words, unlike Germany and Japan where labor law encourages labor-management relations by allowing (and sometimes even requiring) employer sponsored unions, American labor law, as interpreted by the NLRB, expressly forbids them.

If Congress wants to encourage further foreign investment in the United States, and the manufacturing jobs that come with it, they should repeal Section 8(a)(2) of the NLRA.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement