YouTuber Ms Rachel Just Cut a Campaign Check. Take a Wild Guess of...
Dems Know They Probably Should've Kept This Poll Private, Right?
New York Times Puts Brutal Dictator on Its Fashion List, Then Quietly Deletes...
Skynet Panic or Power Grab? Bipartisan Bill Would Let Government Shut Down AI...
Appeals Court Rejects Trump Administration's Efforts to Re-Detain Researcher Over Israel C...
Ted Cruz Makes Interesting Prediction About Democrats in 2028
Thought Crimes Come to Minnesota
Long Island Residents Object to All-Boys Muslim Boarding School in Their Neighborhood
Freddy, Everyone's Favorite German Tourist, Bids America Farewell
The DNC Has Chosen Which State Will Be the First on the 2028...
This Is Who Mamdani Blamed for NYPD Violence
Forcing Assisted Suicide Is Unconstitutional
NM Woman Pleads Guilty in $3.9 Million Medicaid Transportation Fraud Scheme
Trump Demands Key 'Reconciliation 3.0' Step Passed Before August Recess
We've Got Details on ICE's Latest Arrests
Tipsheet

More on the ObamaCare Cronies

More on the ObamaCare Cronies

If ObamaCare does nothing else, it will provide Americans with an object lesson in how the whole "government industrial complex" really works.

It should surprise no one that those with "connections" won the lucrative project of creating the Healthcare.gov web site. Today, more details emerge from the Examiner's Richard Pollock.

Advertisement

In fact, those who run CGI Federal -- awarded a $93 million contract -- were granted White House access. What's more, at least a couple of them were (surprise!) Obama financial supporters. And virtually all of them had worked for the federal government.

It would be silly to think that the private donations of a couple of CGI Federal executives "bought" the ObamaCare contract. But those donations did serve an important purpose -- showing that biggies in the company were "friendlies." And when it comes to government contracting, that can make a big difference.

In the real world, those making decisions like choosing which company to hire had better do it based on the company's technical expertise and its ability to deliver a good product cost-efficiently. Otherwise, the company will lose money and heads will roll.

In government, by contrast, every prejudice, however irrational -- doing business only with "friendlies", for example -- can be indulged. There is no "bottom line," and (especially now) the chief executive couldn't care less about safeguarding the money that's spent (it's only the taxpayers' after all!). Failure carries no penalty; even after a debacle like the web site, every administration official's job seems secure.

Advertisement

When Democrats try to glorify the benevolent work of government, remember this debacle. An overpaid gaggle of cronies have been hired, and paid, to produce an expensive web site that doesn't work. Nobody pays for the debacle, except the taxpayer who subsidized it in the first place.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement