Here's What a CNN Host Said About Tim Walz That Left Scott Jennings...
What ICE Agents Did After Eating Lunch at a Mexican Restaurant in MN...
Wait, That's How a Local Minnesota Dem Described the Leftist Violence Against ICE
Lawrence O'Donnell's Selective Outrage at Vulgarity, and Abby Phillip Gets Debunked by Abb...
Jacob Frey Cannot Get His Way
How China Sold America the Wind Turbine Scam
Food Wars
Israel’s October 7 Wartime Heroes, Both Celebrated and Unsung
Orange County Man Arrested for Alleged Instagram Death Threats Against VP JD Vance
Hannity Grills Democrat Shri Thanedar After He Admits Voting Against Deporting Illegal Sex...
$68 Million Medicaid Fraud: Two Plead Guilty Over Brooklyn Adult Day Care Scheme
The Trump Administration Just Announced New Tariffs on Countries Deploying Troops to Green...
Minneapolis Alleged Gang Member, Felon Charged After Allegedly Stealing Rifle From FBI Veh...
JD Vance Just Destroyed This Indiana Republican for Failing to Act on Redistricting
The Highs and Lows of Nepalese-Israeli Relations
Tipsheet

Fewer Families, Less Religion -- and Less Freedom

The kind of limited government, democratic republic America has always been is possible for only two reasons: (1) The government isn't the sole (or even major) source of economic and social support for its citizens; and (2) Principles, ethics and incentives other than the simple fear of punishment has been effective in deterring anti-social behavior.

Advertisement

That's why it's so disconcerting to learn that two big factors in President Obama's re-election was his electoral dominance among both unmarried Americans (at an all time high) and the religiously unaffiliated (also growing ever larger).

The statistics about single voters are discouraging because marriage (and the formation of the family unit) has been one of the basic building blocks of a vibrant, interconnected society where citizens can depend on stable relationships and relatives as sources of social and economic support, without relying primarily or exclusively on the government.  The statistics about religiously unaffiliated voters are disturbing, as well -- not because they are necessarily bad people, but because over time, without some kind of formal religion, there will be no informal but shared common moral code -- and thus, we'll need more laws just to spell out what we all think is "right" and "wrong" . . . and it will be less common for religious principles alone to serve as a curb on antisocial behavior; we'll have to rely on the threat of state punishment to deter it.

Advertisement

If people increasingly need the state for support, and they increasingly need the state to enforce even basic behavioral codes, that's a recipe for bigger, more intrusive government and far less freedom.  Every honest, thinking person probably knows that encouraging marriage and encouraging some kind of organized religious faith (of whatever denomination) is central to cultivating a healthy, growing society.  The problem now, however, is that Democrats know they are prospering politically as a result of the breakdown of marriage and organized religion -- so what's their incentive to try to right the ship?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos