Backing Off on Deportations Is a Recipe for a GOP Disaster
Democrats Are Milking Things for Every Last Drop
The Minnesota Monsters
From Greenland to Red, White, and Blue Land
Is the Threat of Democrats Taking Over Later a Reason to Tread Lightly...
The Fall of Islam
California Is Dreaming Again!
With Friends Like the Europeans Who Needs Enemies?
Combating Antisemitism in the Black Community: The Pivotal Role of HBCUs
The Civil Rights Pioneer History Forgot
RIP Mark Brnovich, Election Integrity Champion
Decade-Long Manhunt Ends With Arrest of FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitive in Mexico
Ohio Physician Gets 5 Years in Prison for Role in $14.5M Medicare Fraud
Progressives Are Crying About the Lack of Deceptive Editing in Trump's Upcoming Interview
Delhi Man Sentenced to Federal Prison in Oregon for Illegally Exporting Aviation Technolog...
Tipsheet

Rationing: Mammograms Too Expensive?

Guest post from Americans for Prosperity

Yesterday, a federal panel decided that self-exams and some mammograms are no longer necessary for women in their forties and should only be administered every other year for those in their fifties and sixties. Despite being said to reduce cancer deaths by about 15% in women ages 39-59, the federal panel based their decision to change the guidelines because they concluded too much money was spent on “unnecessary tests.”

Advertisement

Sound familiar? That’s probably because it’s the same rationale for many of the decisions made by the government rationing boards in Britain and Canada.

And the results speak for themselves. Where mammograms are used much more infrequently than the U.S., breast cancer mortality rates are 9 percent higher in Canada and 88 percent higher in the United Kingdom!

Is this what we are to expect once we have government-run health care as well?


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement