Why do they call it political correctness, when its simply political and so terribly incorrect?
Whatever we call it — a totalitarian impulse comes to my mind — placing Angela McCaskill on administrative leave from her job at Gallaudet University is just flat-out wrong.
It recently came to my attention that Dr. McCaskill has participated in a legislative initiative that some feel is inappropriate for an individual serving as Chief Diversity Officer, Gallaudet President T. Alan Hurwitz wrote last week on the Universitys Facebook page. McCaskills terrible transgression was to sign a petition to refer the Legislatures same-sex marriage law to the ballot, allowing Maryland voters to cast judgment upon — and potentially overturn — it.
Note that Hurwitz didnt mention any specific university policy violated by McCaskill. Could this constitute a violation of employee rules? Is there a written policy against signing a petition? Or voting? Or speaking up at a town hall meeting? Or breathing without permission?
Worse, while specifically acknowledging her right to sign a petition, Hurwitz added, as if in clarification, that many individuals at our university were understandably concerned and confused by her action.
Yes, there appears to be much confusion at Gallaudet . . . about the most basic principles of our free society.
We . . . are endowed by our Creator with certain . . . rights — including the right to harbor opinions and utter words and even participate in democracy. These rights are so important that, in fact, they are inalienable. Even if ones point of view confuses or confounds those in positions of authority at institutions of higher learning.
No matter how delicately President Hurwitz tap dances about using the extended time while she is on administrative leave to determine the appropriate next steps, taking into consideration the duties of this position at the university, his actions have already clearly violated Dr. McCaskills civil rights. Adding insult to that injury, Hurwitz informed, In the meantime an interim Chief Diversity Officer will be announced in the near future.
Apparently, quick action is required, what with the importance of a universitys CDO. But what on earth does a Chief Diversity Officer do?
And if diversity is so important — and, personally, I really like it — why cant diversity of political opinion be permitted?