Washington, D.C. -- The Independence Day celebration started early this year, on the very last day of June, in front of the Supreme Court of the United States.
I got to the marble steps just a little before the ruling in the Hobby Lobby case, in which the company objected to covering some forms of birth control for its employees, citing religious reasons. Already there was a hopeful anticipation, as Kristan Hawkins from Students for Life led the students, interns, activists, wives and moms in a rally.
Also before the Court were the similar religious-liberty concerns of the Hahn family -- they are Mennonites -- who run a cabinet-making company in Pennsylvania. The Hahns are about the last people in the country who would have wanted to make a federal case of anything. But the federal government had forced them, along with many others whose cases are still pending, including the religious charity group Little Sisters of the Poor, into this position.
The 5-4 decision from the court vindicated the rights of such groups and dealt a blow to the Justice Department. Immediately, opponents of the ruling on the scene outside the Court -- and throughout those places where we gather to opine -- declared that although women were being "screwed" (the most family-friendly phrase of the online reaction), birth control is "here to stay." This was never a question. No one's taking away contraception access on account of the Hobby Lobby ruling, and the Greens were never advocating such a thing. The Obama administration, however, was actively denying the religious liberties of the Greens and Hahns.
In the end, the Court ruled that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act protected these family-run businesses from the coercive power of the mandate. Bill Clinton signed the legislation, which Ted Kennedy helped pass, in 1993.
Outside the Court that morning, activists representing groups including NARAL Pro-Choice America, who helped craft the mandate in the first place, were on-site, too, led by a young man screaming about birth control, as a rainbow-colored sign greeted traffic, insisting that the religious-liberty claim at issue was "Bigotry Disguised as Religion." But what I saw were mostly young women who came out to voice their appreciation for Americans who would go to Court to defend what has been described as "our first, most cherished liberty."
NYT Journalist Wonders: "Free Speech Aside" Why Would Anyone Hold A Contest to Draw Muhammed? | Katie Pavlich