Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Saturday, February 23, 2008
Wayne Winegarden :: Townhall.com Columnist
"Creative Capitalism" or Capitalism's Creativity
by Wayne Winegarden
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

While not as troubled as George Bailey from “It’s A Wonderful Life”, Bill Gates is clearly in need of Clarence’s assistance. For those who did not catch the movie this past Christmas, Clarence was the angel who reminded George Bailey how much he contributed to the world. Bill Gate’s speech at the recent World Economic Forum in Davos shows just how little he appreciates all that he has done.

Bill Gates wants businesses to be more responsive to society’s greatest concerns. Mr. Gates faults capitalism for not caring about the world’s poor and disparages the “heartless” economic system that only serves the interests of the rich. His solution is to foster a system he calls “creative capitalism”. Creative capitalism would redirect the focus of corporations away from profits towards philanthropy. For those familiar with the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) movement, Gates’ creative capitalism will sound hauntingly familiar – his arguments also parallel the 2008 Democratic Presidential platform, but that is the topic for another editorial.

Ironically, the life of Bill Gates exemplifies the potential of capitalism to transform the world, reduce poverty, and create wealth for hundreds of millions of people.

One of the keys to economic growth and development is productivity, or the ability to create more things with the same amount of effort. When productivity growth is strong, the economy grows faster, workers’ wages and standards of living rise faster, and the rate of job growth quickens. During the 1970’s, the U.S. economy’s productivity growth slowed. Due to the slowdown, the potential growth of the U.S. economy weakened.

The information technology (IT) revolution, of which Bill Gates and Microsoft were an integral part, helped to reverse the slowdown in productivity growth. The re-acceleration of productivity growth to its pre-1970’s levels beginning in the 1990’s is partly attributed to the full integration of the IT revolution. The U.S. economy subsequently became one of the few (if only) developed economies that is also a growth economy. Millions of jobs, wage gains, and improvements in our standards of living (for both rich and poor Americans) are directly attributed to both the IT revolution and the productivity gains that revolution created.

Microsoft’s direct economic impact is also impressive. The company directly: created hundreds of thousands of jobs; paid billions of dollars in wages; and, through direct investments, mutual funds, or pension retirement systems, helped secure the financial goals of millions of Americans.

The benefits of the IT revolution were not confined to America’s shores either. From computer manufacturing in Taiwan and the Philippines, to the growth of skilled IT jobs in India, the IT revolution has created unprecedented opportunities and economic development across the developing world. These opportunities have lifted millions of people out of poverty and arguably have done more for economic development than the World Bank or other development NGO’s combined, whose sole raison d’être is to create the types of economic opportunities that Microsoft et al created.

Microsoft the company recognizes the important role the IT sector in general, and Microsoft in particular, plays in society. In October 2007, Microsoft released a study that documented its global economic impact. The findings are astounding. The “Microsoft Ecosystem” of companies employs 42 percent of the global IT workforce of 35.4 million people. These companies will earn more than $400 billion and invest close to $100 billion in local economies. Governments benefit too. The study estimates that employees will pay $500 billion in taxes in 2007. The study also expects these contributions to continue in the future. Globally the IT sector is expected to add 7.1 million jobs in the next 4 years, with the most jobs being created in China and the United States. Putting the expected IT job growth into perspective, the expected IT job growth is three times the expected overall global job growth.

These real tangible benefits exemplify the creativity that is the core of capitalism. Like George Bailey, the world would certainly be a worse place if not for the efforts of Microsoft and Bill Gates. Before Bill decides to deride the ability of capitalism to help the world again, perhaps he should review his own past achievements and reflect on how much better off we all are (rich and poor) because of Bill Gates.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Wayne H. Winegarden Ph.D. is a partner in the firm Arduin, Laffer & Moore Econometrics.

Be the first to read Wayne Winegarden's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Gates has good intentions
Bill Gates' sentiment and desire to want to help the world's poor is truly laudable. Here is one possible approach that could satisfy short-term individual needs, as well as addressing some long-term societal needs.

The 1994 book "The Bell Curve" concluded that IQ is the single greatest factor in determining a person's success in many avenues of life, including income. This means IQ was a greater determiner than Education, Environment, and even Family (where IQs in the same family were divergent).

IQ scores have been observed to improve somewhat over a person's lifetime, however, there appears to be a fundamental genetic trait to intelligience which separates the potential intelligience as opposed to the acquired intelligience.

Here is a possible Good Steward approach for dispensing Social Welfare in the form of dollars. If someone desires assistance from the government (or even from a private pool of funds, such as Mr Gates), the dispenser of those funds has every right to demand something of the recipient in return. The recipient could agree to abstain from having children for the period of time the welfare covers. (How this could be implemented is a whole 'nother issue that I won't attempt to discuss here). This would relieve them of the burden and distraction of raising children, while they would hopefully be attempting to get themselves into some degree of self suffiency.

For the Welfare recipients that have the inherent ability and intelligience to get by on their own, this requirment might be the psychological prod they need to get them positively moving in that direction. For those that continue to be dependent on welfare indefinitely, they will be benefiting the larger society by not contributing to its hereditary dependency.

In order for a capitalist republic to exist and progress, it must depend on the increasingly intelligient participation of its citizenry.

Beneficent capitalism----------
Capitalism can be compassionate and beneficent, but only when the people living under the system are themselves compassionate and beneficent. The problem is, therefore, that of turning greedy capitalists into beneficent capitalists. Exactly how do you do that and why is it important?

It is important because greedy capitalism inevitably breeds resentment which leads to envy which then leads to communism. Communism promises to distribute the seized wealth of the greedy among the envious have-nots.

But how do we create the generous capitalists needed to prevent this?

During the mid 1900s, a man of enormous moral influence, Charles Grandison Finney, spoke to great numbers of American businessmen about the need to participate only in honorable businesses, to be scrupulously honest and to reduce profit levels to those that would allow their businesses to grow properly without being or seeming to be greedy. These men followed Finney’s excellent advice because they had the security of knowing that God had their back, so to speak. Finney was a truly great evangelist/teacher who had introduced those men to biblical Christian commitment and was explaining part of the concomitant obligation that particular choice implied in their lives as businessmen. Because, 1) their fundamental value system had changed, 2) their world view had changed and 3) they knew God was available to help them as his spiritual children, they were able to live out a new and radically different type of capitalism to the benefit of everyone they touched. It was the elusive beneficent capitalism.

That is what Bill Gates is looking for without knowing it and what we need today as a capitalist nation because nothing else will meet the crucial need.


Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.