Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Thomas Sowell :: Townhall.com Columnist
Autism Cures?
by Thomas Sowell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


"New Ways to Diagnose Autism Earlier" read a recent headline in the Wall Street Journal. There is no question that you can diagnose anything as early as you want. The real question is whether the diagnosis will turn out to be correct.

My own awareness of how easy it is to make false diagnoses of autism grew out of experiences with a group of parents of late-talking children that I formed back in 1993.

A number of those children were diagnosed as autistic. But the passing years have shown most of the diagnoses to have been false, as most of these children have not only begun talking but have developed socially.

Some parents have even said, "Now I wish he would shut up."

I did absolutely nothing to produce these results. As a layman, I refused to diagnose these children, much less suggest any treatment, even though many parents wanted such advice.

As word of my group spread, various parents would write to ask if they could bring their child to me to seek my impression or advice. I declined every time.

Yet, if I had concocted some half-baked method of diagnosing and treating these children, I could now claim a high rate of success in "curing" autism, based on case studies. Perhaps my success rate would be as high as that claimed by various programs being touted in the media.

If a child is not autistic to begin with, almost anything will "cure" him with the passage of time.

My work brought me into contact with Professor Stephen Camarata of Vanderbilt University, who has specialized in the study of late-talking children-- and who is qualified to diagnose autism.

Professor Camarata has organized his own group of parents of late-talking children, which has grown to hundreds, as compared to the several dozen children in my group. Yet the kinds of children and the kinds of families are remarkably similar in the two groups, in ways spelled out in my book "The Einstein Syndrome."

The difference is that Professor Camarata is not a layman but a dedicated professional, with decades of experience-- and he too has expressed dismay at the number of false diagnoses of autism that he has encountered.

What Camarata has also encountered is something that I encountered in my smaller group-- parents who have been told to allow their child to be diagnosed as autistic, in order to become eligible for government money that is available, and can be used for speech therapy or whatever other treatment the child might need.

How much this may have contributed to the soaring statistics on the number of children diagnosed as autistic is something that nobody knows-- and apparently not many people are talking about it.

Another factor in the great increase in the number of children diagnosed as autistic is a growing practice of referring to children as being on "the autistic spectrum."

In other words, a child may not actually be autistic but has a number of characteristics common among autistic children. The problem with this approach is that lots of children who are not autistic have characteristics that are common among autistic children.

For example, a study of high-IQ children by Professor Ellen Winner of Boston College found these children to have "obsessive interests" and "often play alone and enjoy solitude," as well as being children who "seem to march to their own drummer" and have "prodigious memories." Many of the children in my group and in Professor Camarata's group have these characteristics.

Those who diagnose children by running down a checklist of "symptoms" can find many apparently "autistic" children or children on "the autism spectrum."

Parents need to be spared the emotional trauma of false diagnoses and children need to be spared stressful treatments that follow false diagnoses. Yet the "autism spectrum" concept provides lots of wiggle room for those who are making false diagnoses.

Real autism may not get as much money as it needs if much of that money is dissipated on children who are not in fact autistic. But money is money to those who are running research projects-- and a gullible media helps them get that money.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of The Housing Boom and Bust.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Thomas Sowell and Townhall.com's daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Or ADD
This new diagnosis reminds me of the South Park parody in which children are read classic literature in one sitting and then asked specific questions like: in chapter 8, what color was Gatsby's car? Any child who fails to answer correctly is prescribed Ritalin.

recession???
does anyone know if the recession has started . or even if it is going to start. or have i missed it. i do hope not. i had such a good time during the last one. would a couple of you please take it upon yourself to let me know the exact instant it starts. i dont want to miss a second of it. they are so much fun.

Autism and its cousins
It seems to me that the urge to have 'perfect' children, children who are seen but not heard, children who never run amok, who never sass, who get all A's and B's... the little darlings who eat their veggies and wash their hands and faces properly... the urge to have such children so that we, as parents, need not be bothered with such difficulties as teaching children moral behavior, helping them study and learn, guiding their social skills (all those 'things' we certainly learned without the help or guidance of parents)... must be just overwhelming.

Whether it is autism or its happily diagnosed 'ADD-ADHS' cousin, parents today seem all to happy to find a 'disease' or 'disorder' - so long as it comes with a corresponding drug - to aid them in their quest for the perfect child.

And dishonest and unscrupulous 'doctors' and 'counselors' are more than happy to oblige... provided the parents are willing to pay the bill.

And in the end, the children and society pay the penalty. Children never learn to cope with whatever ails them - real or imagined. They instead learn that to feel 'normal' is to take a drug... A lesson, I fear, that is way out of control in the world today.

MRCMRC/Id**t
What does "recession" have to do with autism? If you can't read or comprehend, maybe you should restrict (din't post) your input to these threads. As others have noted, you seem to need help.

You really should find a "qualified" shrink for analysis before making other entries to this, or for that matter, any thread.

****

To those who can read and understand, I write:

As a 77 yrs old father of a truly autistic 25 year old daughter, I have also experienced the same set of "experts" who have "solutions" too numerous to document. Nearly all were just "money makers" and produced no results.

And unfortunately many so-called experts could give testimonials of their successes and this opened the door to desperate parents seeking a miracle, but ended up a little poorer.

I love my autistic daughter; I know her for who she is, a truly beautiful child of God. I cannot understand why He chose me to be responsible for her. On the other hand, I can understand why my wife, a truly loving and caring mother, was chosen.

We have met so many wonderful "special needs" children and adults as determined by age. I am becoming resentful of the term "special needs", we all have special needs, the most important being able to love and share our fortunes with those who need all the love they can get.

If you haven't taken the time to get to really know these remarkable gifts from God, you should find a good organization such as Little Friends located primarily in Naperville, IL. I promise; your life will be enriched by the experience.

To DC from UT

As a native Utahn, some 77 years ago, my wife and I are looking to relocate to a state that has benefits for those who truly need them. Our daughter arrived when I was 50 years old. I was, at first shocked, as was my wife, to learn that she was truly autistic.

Obviously I am aware that autism is a "spectrum" but when it plain, pure and simple, it is time to become a true adult and take responsibility.

Illinois ranks somewhere in the vicinity of 49/50 as one of the worst states for providing reasonable assistance. Personally, we do not look to the state, or the federal programs for much; we are doing all we can on our own.

Many parents cannot do this and do need help. How do you rate Utah?

No Doubt Diagnosis
It seems that more and more in the mental "sciences" putting a name or initials to an observed condition implies understanding.

This even prompts cures with drugs, shock therapy, behavior modification and so on. In the past prefrontal lobotomy was considered a cure.

There is no doubt about autism. But the cause is still unclear, and the treatment is as well.

To DC FROM UT
Hey there -

Welcome back to wonderful Utah! :)

I have two autistic children. They are on the mild end of the spectrum, but have both been special ed most of their lives. Now one is in college at BYU and the other is in 9th grade.

We live in the Nebo school district and have been VERY pleased with the services available for our daughter here.

Because the LDS church is so strong here, we have also felt very blessed to have incredibly supportive neighbors, church leaders and community leaders who are very sensitive to the needs of our children (our son is serving a Special Service Mission while attending BYU because they did not feel he could handle a full time mission)

California provides excellent services for disabled children and adults - especially those with Autism. But having lived both places - I can tell you - the services provided there are not worth all the other crap you have to live with in California (and forget the housing prices!).

I've never been happier than here in Utah and my children are both thriving!

Good luck!

Thank You, Dr. Sowell
Dr. Sowell's comments clarifying misdiagnosis of autism are welcome. Autism seems to be the new milleneum's version of Attention Deficit Disorder, which has been the cause of millions of children starting on the road to drug therapy (Ritalin) for no more reason than teachers think a particular child is too active. Autism and pseudo-autism as Dr. Sowell describes it is sad in its development. However, can anyone answer this question - I thought Dr. Sowell was an economist. I do not understand his involvement with autism in the first place. He certainly understands the disorder is the province of the medical community, but I just wonder what his connection is in dealing with parents of children wrongly diagnosed as autistic. Do not take this as criticism of Dr. Sowell, who among Townhall contributors, makes more sense than any others.

Because its there.....
doesn't mean you're entitled to it. Government can mean well by setting up assistance to those with a need. Some have the where-with-all to care for a special needs child. Others don't. God doesn't pick parents by means.

Unfortunately, there are some that will exploit the government trough. Even to the point where you can listen to someone on late night television dressed up and acting like the Riddler from Batman fame. He will tell you how you can suck from the government teat whether you need to or not.

We have allowed this to grow because we don't take responsibility for our lives. We let the government programs live past their prime. It began with Social Security and then Medicare, Medicaid and Welfare. Politicians saw how much the people liked these and feared taking them away. RFK knew welfare would hurt the poor more than help. Most of these programs were put in place as a temporary assistance but, once in place, entitlements are almost impossible to remove. This is a good reason to consider long and hard whether adding health care to this list is worth it.

If someone would have the courage to trim these programs to just those that have a need we would be able to really do some good instead of just feeling like we are doing good.

Procrustean Diagnosis
I recall Garrison Keillor observing that every shy person was now being followed by the FBI because every time a mass murderer was apprehended, the neighbours reported that *he was a quiet man who kept to himself.*

Recently a screaming, flailing brat who became enraged when a restaurant did not serve food she demanded was thrown out of the place when other customers complained; Mama said Miss Brat was *autistic* which apparently meant that she was permitted to hold the restaurant hostage to her behaviour. I have also heard mothers insist that their shrieking, uncontrolled darling was ENTITLED TO TRANSPORTATION and therefore allowed to hold an airplane hostage to his behaviour. Yes, there are some children who literally cannot control their behaviour. In the interests of community harmony and their own safety, they should be kept from holding us hostage.

I am convinced that autism is the Child version of the Race Card; it is an excuse for the parents to avoid responsibility for controlling their children or respecting the community. Just play the Autism Card and presto! Your child cannot be disciplined!

Advances in Medicine
A great thing about America is that we have a much better class of snake oil salesmen. Advanced degrees and no longer forced to work off the back of a wagon. Is this a great country or what?

Follow the money
Autism and ADD mean more money for our Public Schools.
Do you suppose there is a connection as to the massive increase in both?

autistic or neurologically immature?
Some time ago, I read an Ann Landers column listing the symptoms of autism. Had I seen this when my son was a child, I would have been quite frightened, as he'd exhibited many of them. Fortunately, I'd lived in blissful oblivion, and my son by that time was a socially adept adult embarked on a successful career.

Had he been young today, there's no doubt he would have been diagnosed as being "on the autistic spectrum". As it turned out, his real difficulty was that he had some significant perceptual problems that probably represented neurologic immaturity and responded well to the time-honored educational techniques of drill, rote and repetition.

Children mature neurologically at different rates, boys being traditionally slower than girls. However, educational curricula are being geared toward ever-younger children, many of whom simply do not have the neurologic maturity necessary to master the required skills. The results of this are frustration and concomitant misbehavior on the part of the child, who's then diagnosed as having ADD or whatever the disease du jour happens to be.

I have to wonder how many children are being blithely labeled "autistic" when the real problem (if any) lies elsewhere.

Paranoia Strikes Deep
When I was in college, friends recommended taking a course in Abnormal Psych, saying it was a mindf**k. That description was prescient. Using the list of symptoms diagnosis mentioned by Dr Sowell made almost every student in the class think they had every neurosis or psychosis described in the text. What I find baffling is that in that course, autism was listed as a rather profound juvenile form of schitzophrenea which was quite uncommon in incidence, but on TV today we see PSAs that claim the incidence is 1 in 150. When mom and dad's little urchin exhibits behavior that differs from some hypothetical idea of perfection, something must be wrong and ergo sombody else has to pay and that somebody is usually the taxpayer. American society is the most generous on the planet, but unfortunately for every case of legitimate need, there are hundreds if not thousands of parasites who capitalize on the real need of others to get their lunchhooks into the pile o'cash that is the US Treasury.

I read somewhere
that Einstein was a late talking child. I can't remember where I read it, and I would not speculate about the reliability of the statement, but it's interesting.

It seems like the old saying "follow the money" proves to be true over and over again. It's always about the money. Can you say "climate change"?

uwcharlie - Reply #8
I think his group of "late-talking children" which he formed for unexplained reasons (possibly a personal interest?) led him there. He is certainly an esteemed economist, and as he freely acknowledges, unqualified to diagnose autism.

Lyme and Autism connection
There is inceasing research that supports the connection between chronic Lyme Neuroborreliosis and autism (as well as MS and Alzheimers). The Lyme spirochete, Borrelia Burghdorferi, is cousin to the syphilis spirochete, which invades the central nervous system once diseminated causing all manners of symptoms from physical to psychiatric. The IDSA (Infectious Disease Society of America) and the CDC are actively covering up the scope and severity of the Lyme epidemic. ILADS (International Lyme and Associated Diseases) have the best diagnostic and treatment criteria and the correct perspective on Lyme.

If you want to learn more about both Lyme and the controversy, Google the work of Dr.Joseph Burrascano, ILADS, Turn the Corner Foundation, The Human Side of Lyme (Dr. Virginia Sherr), and Dr.Robert Bransfield- for a start! There is also a new book called, "The Austism and Lyme Connection"- the authors names escape me.

Anyone diagnosed with Fibromyalgia (which is always Lyme in my opinion), MS, bi-polar disorder, rheumatoid arthritis (JRA), chronic fatigue, ALS, depression/anxiety, and a host of other CNS and psychiatric symptoms should see a Lyme literate doctor (LLMD) for an examination.


Kids need adults,structure and freedom
I taught pre-K and Kindergarten at a Montessori School in NM. and my observations of these kids there were:
(we had "special needs" kids diagnosed w/autism,ADD,and ADHD)
First and foremost that most who were on meds for their ADD/ADHD their behavior/focus improved when they had long recesses and structured exercise. Strong class rules and enforcement of those rules and that the parents of these diagnosed kids were the least likely to disipline their kids because they had been "told" their kids were "special needs" kids.
The kids with "autism" did very well if left to do their own thing with the activities and then worked on on one with myself or my aide. When they were ready for interaction they looked for it and then progressed.
I'm not qualified for diagnosis but I have a nursing degree and 3 kids of my own one who they wanted to put on ritalin but I didn't allow it. I just played hard with them and we did martial arts together till they were physically tired and we had some OJ. and did homework.
I think the schools need to get PE back into the day and more recesses back and alot of kids will thrive again and not be made to feel like there is something wrong with them.
There also has to be a spirit of competition so the kids will thrive to better themselves. Parents have to be parents, not be best buddies and allow outrageous behavior. There has to be rules and expectations that are followed and punishment when they're not.
For the real, not misdiagnosed, kids I applaud their parents and hope to god they find the right kind of help for their special child.


Faulty Diagnosis
Sowell's article is right on. As a parent of an autistic child I am encouraged about the increased attention to autism. It gets more funding and attracts more professionals to the field. But with more professionals they need more diagnosis of autism to keep the funding coming, thereby attracting more professionals who will diagnose more patients. The more faulty diagosis thereby dilutes the ability to focus on the true causes of autism. There is no good answer here. The increased focus on autism is certainly better than no focus at all.

uwcharlie
If memory serves me, Dr. Sowell in interested in late talker because he was a late talker.

AudiR10
I am glad you are convinced -- now go and convince a truely autistic child and the parents who love him or her.

Ignorance
I am quite offended by all on this post who appear to have no clue what true autism is really like. It appears most have bulked it into the same category as ADD and are claiming it is used as an excuse as to why our children aren't "perfect."

I don't disagree that over-diagnosis and being quick to fix behavorial problems with drugs, such as ritalin, has become a problem, but to sterotype everyone who has been diagnosed with this disorder without experiencing it first hand is just wrong.

The closest person on this post to experiencing what I am talking about is the woman with two children on the "mild spectrum" of Autism, and her one child is now in college. Let me give you a clue as to a spectrum that is not so mild. My nephew will probably never see a normal elementary school classroom. He takes constant attention every "minute" of the day. There are no drugs to help; there is no cure. Autism is such a mystery that medical science isn't even sure of the cause or if it is even genetic or not, although most researchers are not leaning toward genetics.

For those who want to bulk Autism into the category of ADD, and the excusing our responsibility as parents to discipline and raise our children, I would like to see you attempt to take care of my nephew just for a few hours and then see if you would come to the same conclusion.

I don't disagree with this article. There are misdiagnosis that do not help the cause or the parents with their children. But, just because some are misdiagnosed doesn't mean all are misdiagnosed and it doesn't mean there isn't a real problem with autism.

Gregory
I hope I didn't offend, I was merely stating that I had seen many mis-diagnosed kids who indeed improve.
I as a nurse have seen "real" autism in many levels and hope daily that there is something done for these special kids. and my respect for the total self-sacrifice of their parents to help and love them. It would un-glue most people.

Gregrory, I agree, and
your post is, obviously, so much more eloquent than mine, but I was trying to make the same point. I also have an autistic nephew and see the struggles he and his parents go through and I was also offended by the tone of many of the posts as well.

Autism Cures?
If money can be had to study something, professionals, or quasi professionals, will find, or make, cases to study. If more money can be secured by producing a certain result, that result will be found. I have nothing but respect and admiration for parents that see to the need of an autistic child, and I have no quarrel with legitimate studies, but often the goal of the research is to obtain more funding, not an unbiased result. That applies to medical studies and climatic studies.

THANK YOU SO MUCH...
..FOR BRINGING THIS TOPIC TO LIGHT!

My son was mis-diagnosed by the school-hired psychologist as having Aspergers. As you said, she used the basic "marching to his own drummer" "obsessive on one subject" (he likes WWII and watches the History channel) and - her words - "would have been considered a geek when we grew up"...

I smelled a rat and took him to our family doctor who recommended a pediatrician and behaviorial care specialist. After examining my son, he said that we had nothing to worry about and that Aspergers was the new "it" diagnosis.

Plain and simple "different" isn't "wrong". It amazes me that the liberal status quo has to put a lable on everything/one that doens't fit their concept of "normal".

Keep up the good work. I look forward to your column every TH Daily email!

some good some bad
Sowell is right that what is needed is not increasing austism diagnosis to increase funding, but rather to focus on the children who actually have autism. And of course this requires developing standards for determining which children actually have it. Obviously we should be suspect of people who come up with a standard of diagnosis and then can "cure" children who meet it, when it is as possible that the diagnosis was simply wrong.

Sowell makes a mistake, though, in running together the issue of false diagnosis with that of an Autism spectrum. These are rather different things. In one case one has children who do not need treatment, simply time to develop at their own pace. In the other we have children whose disease is less severe than the truly debillitating case of autism, but no less real for that.

So Sowell deserves credit for treading on a subject which deserves discussion and brings out a lot of anger. But there is still something superficial about his discussion which seems to tied into ideology.

@Gregory:
I think the real question here is this - what were they talking about? Was it true Autism, or was it 'autism'? I placed the quotes around the word intentionally; the word itself is basically being stripped of meaning, so that it can be applied to something other than the true definition. However, the posters here are not the ones doing this; rather, it is those who seem to have decided that 'autism' is as good a choice as anything for explaining behavioural 'problems', much as 'Attention Deficit Disorder'(or my own previously-given diagnosis, 'Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder') used to be. The posters here are, as far as I can tell, reacting to those who began the process you seem to find so distasteful.

If you feel that I am wrong in this, I would request that you point out to me the posts and sections of posts which you feel are inappropriate.

More popular misdiagnosis
Bi-polar is another popular diagnosis that gets thrown around like confetti. Many of the kids I work with have been diagnosed as being bi-polar by some clinic hack (there are MANY!) and their lives become governed by it, depsite having few symptoms that match the diagnostic criteria.

ADD and ADHD are also overly diagnosed. Many kids come to school from what is tantamount to a war zone, and some of them have alot of trouble sitting and concentrating. Throw in the educational trends of constant group work and emphsis on sensory stimulus, and you have the perfect environment for "ADD/ADHD" when kids are a bundle of raw nerves and locked and loaded defenses coming in.

Been there done that.
Our son was advanced in all areas at age 3 - he was just starting to read, and he could run and throw as well as children 3 years older than him. I thought if the pro athlete career didn't work out we would have the first doctor in our family. Then he started having small head jerks - nothing to worry about our family doctor told us. After two weeks we took him to the "best" children's hospital in the state. They diagnosed him with epilepsy. He was in their care for three years. When we finally fled their "care" he had lost the ability to talk, could only walk a few steps at a time and could only eat soft food since his seizures caused him to choke on his food. The hospital had seven neurologists and he had been treated by five of them. The last time we were there we met with all five in a round table discussion of his future treatment. They agreed his condition was intractable and would continue to worsen until he was a vegetable on a feeding tube. Then they told us he would probably still live a normal life span unless he died in an accident, they proceeded to list off the possibly ways we might "accidentally" kill our son.

We went through three more doctors before he was finally correctly diagnosed - Doose Syndrome. Our current doctor explained how many of the drugs proscribed by the esteemed children's hospital actually made his condition worse. Two weeks after starting the Keto diet our son's mind emerged from the mist and he has been seizure free for three years. Today he is still in intensive physical therapy to recover from his previous treatment.

I'm sure that had the doctors at the children's hospital continued to treat him their prophesy of his future would have been self fulfilled.


Autism & related disorders
I'm the single mother of an adult child with Ausbergers (mild form of autism). My daughter was continually misdiagnosed as 'retarded', 'unsocial', 'stupid', you get the picture from grade school until middle school where she was enrolled in special ed classes. Once they tested her IQ (she graduated in top third of her class) the school realized she was different but had no idea what to do with her.
None the less, she's now grown, on her own, working part time and while she needs a little help (who doesn't?) - she does just fine. People are too quick to label and provide $$ answers - meds don't do it, but patience, understanding, education (for the ignorant masses) couldn't hurt. She's the nicest person I know - more than I can for most!

OldSocial Worker
You speak the truth about Lyme. My twin granddaughters have had it for years which led to the discovery for many other family members that they had it as well. Some had been diagnosed with Rheumatoid Arthritis, etc.

This is the biggest govt. coverup in my lifetime. I'm just not sure why. Does it have something to do with the Insurance industry?

Anyway, we've tried all manner of alternative treatments after the CDC's protocal failed. We have just purchased a Rife machine and hope it produces results.

Of course, all of this is paid for out of our own pockets which is why I have little pity for those who have the govt. footing the bill for all their children's ills.

Adrienne
Your post brings up an interesting point. I was diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome, an autism spectrum disorder at 38 years of age. My step-father believes that I am using this as an excuse to be rude.



I asked my doctor the difference between having Asperger's and being a self-centered jerk, because the symptoms are very similar. He explained that a jerk knows he is hurting people's feelings but doesn't care, whereas I care very much, but just don't know.

In fact, I probably worry more about being polite than do most people, because it can be so very confusing knowing what is appropriate or inappropriate behavior. But the flipside is that people with autism spectrum disorder are unbelievably loyal, will listen intently to every word you say (because we can't read your body language, we focus on words), and very rarely lie, because it doesn't even occur to us to be dishonest.

I'm sure that there are false diagnoses of autism spectrum disorders, just as there are false diagnoses of cancer and heart disease. It does not mean that they aren't real diseases.

autism - "causes"
I have personally become very active in collecting- and verifying- information about autism and its causes. There is so much misinformation about this, and because no one by and large has challenged it, it has become accepted as truth. My boys have been diagnosed on the autistic spectrum, one with Asperger's, bipolar, OCD, ODD, etc. and the other with high-functioning autism. The first has been cured of his issues-- through diet and homeopathy. The other is coming along wonderfully. We do not need nor are looking for any government help.

I do not argue the case of mis-diagnoses nor the fact that schools receive a TON of often mis-appropriated money when they have children in their special needs programs.

My children were in the public schools, but are doing fantastically homeschooled now

The fundamental of this issue is money and its abuse. I will open a can of worms here and say vaccines and the vaccine industry are at the core here. And here is where the government can step in and start honestly looking at what is in vaccines, how they're made, and take an honest look at what we are injecting into our children from the day of their birth. It is asinine to say there is no connection between this and the rise of autism-- and it boils down to money that's been keeping the American public in the dark about this.

Please don't say parents are in the dark about a mis-diagnosis of the children whom they love who are diagnosed with autism-- at a rate of 1 in 150 to 1 in 90 in some states (interestingly, NJ has the highest rate of diagnosed autism and also the highest vaccination rate in the country!).

I fully agree with Mr. Sowell, that there is an abuse of mis-diagnoses for the sake of getting government hand-outs. This is wrong and needs to be addressed. But there is no denying the rise in and epidemic of autism, and its correspondence to the rise in vaccinations.


Ender, check out
the post from AudiR10.

Autism
My son was a late talker, but we never worried about autism. We figured he wasn't talking, because he could get what ever he wanted just by pointing and saying, "ugh, ugh."

When he did start talking and I carried him into a store, he would yell for everyone to hear, "Hi everyone, here I am."

Vaccines not to blame
The tendency to blame vaccines is understandable, but it is fallacious. Despite years of studies, no link can be proven between autism and vaccines. But the myth persists.

Yes, there was an explosion of autism in the 90s, but this can be explained by better awareness of the disease, and the addition of Asperger's to the DSM.

Children often present with autism after the first round of vaccinations, causing parents to blame the vaccinations. But the disease usually becomes noticable around the time children start talking, which coincides with vaccination. It is simple post hoc fallacy. Autistic children can advance and regress in their development, making it look like some outside agent caused them to lose some of their communication skills, when it is simply part of the normal progress of the disease.

subsidies cause surplus
Even in medicine, subsidies affect supply. Subsidizing an illness will cause greater misdiagnosis of that illness.

I smell a fraud --------
When it looks like a fraud (duck if you like), walks like a fraud (insert duck), and quacks like a fraud (again insert duck), it must be a fraud - err.... make that a duck! Ha!

IMHO - You do not have to have a PhD in psychology to spot a fraud. All you need is some facts combined with common sense!

MRC
obviously suffers from autism

Tom
I am not trying to diagnose your son on the basis of one post on a comment board, but Asperger's kids usually go straight from not talking to very sophisticated speech very quickly. They tend not to use baby talk, but rather talk like a "little professors".

When I started talking it freaked out my family members because I went from nothing to complete sentences, and using words like "actually" and asking if I was getting "adequate nutrition" at the age of two. My Mom actually wondered what was wrong with my little sister when she developed speech at a normal rate.

You are correct that late talking does not necessarily mean autism, but rapid development of language after late talking is actually consistent with the pathology. (Also, people with Asperger's love to use phrases like "consistent with the pathology.)

Slow and easy
As a widower and single parent of four children all of whom are now successful productive adults I want to throw in my two cents. My oldest child had a lot of the "characteristics of Asperger Syndrone, and if the "professionals" had gotten the chance they probably would have stuck that lable on him. He is now in his fifth year as a naval officer on a nuclear submarine so leaving the "professionals" out of the process probably was a blessing. My second son didn't talk until he was four. He now is a stand up comic for a hobby and works for a living as a consultant. Many parents panic when a child doesn't meet the "normal" patterns. Dr. Sowell had a child who didn't speak until he was four years old and this caused he and his wife great concern and began the process he discribes in his book "The Einstein Syndrome". I also put myself through college many years ago by caring for truely autistic children who had been put in a private boarding school paid for by the state of CT. Actual autism not only exists but is crushing for all involved. Of course their are many things which can effect all of us and most likely they are of many different types then our rather simple mass media culture can seem to comprehend at one time. The main stream media cooks up the latest "it disease" to allow it to babble about something to fill the endless amount of air time made available by modern cable networks. This sometimes has more bad effects then we think.

to cleverness_of_me in NY
Are you aware of the Simpsonwood, GA meeting in June, 2006? I have the transcript from this meeting which was between the CDC, FDA, and leaders of the major vaccine manufacturers-- a meeting that was supposed to be kept in absolute secrecy. But the transcript was made and, because of the Freedom of Information Act, I was able to get a copy of this.

At this meeting, those present came to a consensus not only that the connection between what is put in vaccines has an undeniable link to autism, but also that they need to do everything they can to cover this up. Your words here say that what the CDC and the vaccine manufacturers are still telling the public is what you've heard and what you've been led to believe.

Are you aware that it is representatives from the pharmaceuticals and vaccine makers that educate our medical doctors about medicines and vaccines? What do you think they're going to tell their captive audience about the products they want to sell?

Are you aware, too, that the "trace" amounts of mercury still allowed in vaccines is still above the FDA's recommended safe level for drinking water for adults? This is in vaccines we give to our children.

Dr. Bernadine Healy, former head of the National Institutes of Health, has gone on record as saying that it is foolish to deny any connection between vaccines and autism with the minuscule amount of research that has been done.

There is so much more that I can share with you too. Research is going on daily that is more and more substantiating the connection between vaccines and autism. It is a shell that we, the American public, need to break through so that we can begin to see the truth of the mess we're in.

Nickel
People with Asperger's usually do very well in the military. They tend to have trouble in unstructured environments, but follow rules very well. Many are also attracted to the stage, (as I was), where you have pre-determines roles and material. A survival skill that many with the disorder learn is memorizing "material" for social occasions, much as a comic would use on stage. So your proofs that they do not have Asperger's are consistent with someone who does have it.

Regardless of whether your son does or does not have the syndrome, I admire his decision to serve at this trying time.

Cathy
Are you familiar with "Paranoid Personality Disorder"?

Vaccines and Autism
In conjunction with Cathy's comments: Offhand, I doubt that vaccines directly cause autism. However, vaccines sort of tend to be given en masse around the same time both correct and incorrect diagnoses of autism occur.

In addition to which the physical consequences of over-vaccination will assuredly cause all sorts of easily misread symptoms.

I joined the Army in 1964. Theory was then that every soldier would remain vaccinated at all times against all possible illnesses in all possible places. It was so bad that severl of us Privates were detailed at night to forge Dr's name on shot records as no MD could possibly keep up with that workload.

The theory did not work of course and it created more sick soldiers than it kept well. Later on, vaccinations were reduced to what one was actually likely to encounter. Not only did physical illnesses drop like a stone, so did
adverse mental conditions leading to early discharges.

Whole nine yards is like trying to cure alcoholism with continuous medication. Nobody ever gets well by staying drunk.

Pill pushers combined with control freaks are an unholy temptation. Stop paying parents to fall into their trap.

Walk a Mile in Another's Shoes
I have great respect for Mr. Sowell, but his consistent condemenation of autism is starting to wear thin. This is not the first article Mr. Sowell has written negatively about the issue.

I strongly suggest Mr. Sowell find various families, some with a severly autistic child and a mildly autistic child and spend time walking in their shoes. Maybe he would finally have some compassion for their plight.

I speak as a parent of a child with mild autism.
I gave up my career to homeschool our daughter. We knew since she was two something was "different." No, we were not expecting a perfect child, but we knew something wasn't right. To make a long story short, our daughter was identified as mildly autistic and GATE identified but "too high functioning to qualify for special services" from the public school system. That didn't change the fact that she had social and academic issues which needed attention. We have provided that on our, and I can assure you it hasn't been cheap.

Her diagnosis is not fake, nor is the support she has needed. She is doing well, but it has taken dedication on our part to make sure that happened. I truly resent someone, including Mr. Sowell, who disavows the reality of the Autism Spectrum and its impact on families.


I agree with Dr. Sowell
I had over 33 years of experience with autistic children as part of being a school social worker. Also, my twin brother has two autistic children. They were, I think, the result of both being severe premie's. children who might not be saved in past years.

I too dealt with children who didn't talk. They were refered to in those days as "elective mutes". In time, they all spoke.

In weathly nations we can worry about global warming and about "perfect children". Let's be careful about diagnosies that stigmatize. I notice a growing movement for parents of autistic children to force insurance comapnies to pay for expensive "treatment". For those with truly autistic children, it is extremely difficult and they need assistance. But, please, make sure the diagnosis fits.

Jeff
He has walked a mile in your shoes.

Simpsonwood
Not proven.

"The critics are making a big deal out of the fact that the information presented at the meeting was "embargoed." If you read the transcript, you see that participants were only sworn to secrecy until ACIP meeting the following week."

"Nothing said at Simpsonwood suggests an attempt to whitewash or cover up anything. The study got some interesting results, which later failed to withstand verification at the third HMO."

"It is very suspicious that diagnosis rates varied so dramatically between the HMOs for many of the outcomes of interest. The discrepancy was so great the authors had to present the data from each one separately."

And finally,

"The Simpsonwood study could not have established a causal link between thimerosal and ill health. The study is sophisticated accounting of correlations. The original data show that infants who got more vaccines (or got their vaccines "on time") were also more likely to be diagnosed with certain neurological conditions later in life.

What might this mean? Maybe thimerosal in vaccines caused the problems. The most likely alternative explanation is that conscientious parents who vaccinate their kids on time are also more likely to seek treatment and obtain diagnoses for more subtle neurological symptoms like speech delay and ADHD."

Read it here:

http://majikthise.typepad.com/majikthise_/2005/06/simpsonwo od_thi_1.html

------

Dr. Williams rightly urges caution in these things, as do the posters who point out that the government has a way of distorting things with money. This is not being unempathetic.

Personal Experience
As as young child I had to have speech therapy. It seems that my ability to fashion thoughts raced ahead of my ability to enunciate words. Some simple drills twice a week for 18 months to two years cured that problem.

Then, when starting school, various and sundry tests showed that I was retarded and was a half-step above a moron. Of course by the end of the lst grade I was able to read and comprehend
at the 8th grade level. So I continued my education in the normal manner.

Hate to think what would have happened to me if today's educrats had gotten their hands on me.

At the risk of indulging in unsubstantiated conspiracy theory, I sometimes think that the real goal of the education lobby is to destroy talent by repressing it whenever found.

Jeff
Sowell has written a book on the subject and researched it heavily. He is not unsympathetic.

If your daughter is truly autistic, then you should appreciate Dr. Sowell's efforts to expose these misdiagnosises. Such opportunism diverts funding and talent that could otherwise make great strides in treating this terrible disease.

Oilpatch Mercenary
Your theory might be a stretch, but definitely possible.

Autistic children
Thanks to Gregory for nicely speaking for many of us. My son is 4 years old and quite correctly diagnosed with autism.
For those who want to rant about false diagnosis to support lazy parents:I suggest that you try it first! I can guarantee that my son will wear your butt out in 1 hour! Unfortunately we have had to take our son out in public from time to time under circumstances that were not ideal for bystander's peace and quiet. A good example is cross-Atlantic flights, a requirement, as I was stationed in Germany for five years. Of course we felt bad, and we did the best that we could, but my son was disuptive and loud from time to time on that flight. If you see a kid like that hopping or dancing on tip-toes in the grocery store I challenge some of you to look that parent in their sleep-deprived eyes and explain to them them that they just need to enforce some discipline and structure!

Vaccines
I won't try to assert their role in autism one way or another, but overprescribed vaccines (and other medicines) pose serious health threats. Vaccinating healthy people against minor ailments accelerates diseases' evolution. The same principle applies to antibiotics. Doctors hand those out like candy out of fear of a John Edwards-style lawsuit and, voila, the bugs have regained the lead. Now we have resistant bacteria like MRSA and insufficient technology to do anything about it.


Evidence of Harm
Vaccination in and of itself is NOT harmful. What MAY be a vector for harmful effect is the fact that many facilities use larger than needed vials of vaccines which are loaded with preservatives (including Thimerasol).

When I was a tyke (in the Dark Ages) my family doc kept vaccines in PRE-LOADED syringes and under refrigeration. He only bought what he knew he'd use in a short period of time so they didn't need to have a lot of preservatives in them.

Multi use vials and combo vaccines have become the norm. We had a guest speaker at my medical college who was mentioned in the book "Evidence of Harm". She carried out a very exhaustive program of research involving mice. The results were published and IMMEDIATELY refuted by the NIH and other agencies.

Many doctors at these agencies also sit on the boards of large pharmaceutical companies. Can we say "conflict of interest"? They wanted to see ALL the raw data including some of the research models (mice). They KNEW that animal use protocol requires that we always euthanize our animals the moment they're no longer needed.

In other words they sandbagged her AND her study. If there's nothing to hide WHY do they go to such lengths to stifle research. When she reapplied for a grant to duplicate the study she was denied funding. Hmmmm.

-Ray

Rich - Simpsonwood, etc.
I appreciate your comments- and I will read the link you sent. I work to research thoroughly both sides of every issue I feel strongly about. But first and foremost, I am a mother, and right now, while I am collecting research, my husband and children are my priority. I have also found there to be entirely too much misinformation and half-truths we are being told about not only vaccines but also medicines. I was told several years ago that a certain psychotropic drug the psychiatrist wanted to try on my son was perfectly safe for children. I researched this on my own and found there had been no testing done on children- this would be "unethical". So my son was, in a sense, a guinea pig for their testing. No thanks! The same goes for vaccines. We are still told to accept what we're being told, that there is no link. But then we find how badly they skewed what they told us of the Denmark study that supposedly showed autism continuing to rise when thimerosal was removed. Autism rates went DOWN significantly in that country from the removal of thimerosal- the rise in numbers happened only because at the same time the gov't there decided to take more action in helping and started a program of registering children with autism. And what about the fact, too, that there have been no true federally-funded controlled case studies funded between those who received their vaccines and those who haven't? "Unethical"? Hogwash. It's unethical NOT to have these done. Privately, these have been done, and the results are unarguable. Among the Amish, the only cases of autism found were among those children who had some exposure to either mercury or vaccines.

Dr. Healy's interview with CBS: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/05/12/cbsnews_investig ates/main4086809.shtml

Again, I can share so much more of what I've been finding. But I feel this is detracting from what Mr. Sowell here originally presented. Besides, I need to get back with my children.

Historian
Just where does Dr. Sowell condemn people in your situation? I'm listening...

You of all people ought to be appreciative. Wasting valuable R&D time and dollars on children with introspective personalities, speech impediments, or simple TV/video game addictions. Sowell's stated abuses severly stifle advances to one-day cure this horrible affliction.

AudiR10
I don't think you understand what autism is. I am a parent of an autistic child. Believe me, I gave up trying spank/discipline when it became apparent that she could not help her meltdowns and screaming.

Having said that, we do our best to avoid taking her to public places due to the effect it can have on her. We gave up attending church a couple of years ago.

One more thing, I respect Mr. Sowell's opinions but I would be careful with trying to characterize the Autism Spectrum as not being valid. I see his point and the possibility of abuse/misdiagnosis, but not every autistic fits Kanner's Classic Autism (i.e. the child lives completely in their own world oblivious to everything and every one around them). It is really true that when you meet one autistic person, you've met one autistic person.


As far as government services go, while I am a conservative, I do see the need for help for people with disabilities. While there are a lot of snake oil salesmen out there is one scientifically proven method of treating autism and that is ABA. It is really expensive. Most parents aren't able to afford it. But, it is key and helping the child control their behavior and how they react to their environment.

Gregory, An amateur Historian
Amen!!!

parents of children with autism
I think that maybe ya'll are projecting what you have heard from or been dealt by others onto Sowell & others on this board. Try reading this article and the comments as objectively as possible without expecting negative notes. I think you'll find that so far folks have been pretty supportive and positive about you and yours. Those who do believe that there is an over-diagnosis problem admit that there are many being held hostage by this disorder. And you must admit that there are alot of excuse-making, discipline-refusing parents out there!
So, please accept our sympathies for the problems you and yours face, but please also be willing to take things at face value.

Subsidizing Autism
You get more of what you subsidize. If the goverment subsidizes autistic children, you will have more autistic children. Granted, many of these kids will not really BE autistic, but the government will think they are, and they spend money on programs for them.

The Point
I think one point everyone is missing is that it is very difficult to differentially diagnose autism of any severity with very young children. There is no one test; it's all about a collection of behaviors. Yes, sometimes, children are misdiagnosed with all types of learning difficulties when they are too young. There is such a wide range of development, especially in the first three years. But there are a few kiddos that we just know need that early intervention - and that can't hurt. There are many agencies that cost nothing to families that provide excellent intervention in the home, until age 3 and then in a school setting if that is the most appropriate. Do your own research (although the internet is probably not the best place as its very subjective) but trust the professionals too.

rlaTEXAS
You're right. Too many posters are severly misinterpreting Sowell's point.

Easy, Jeff
Reply # 47
Date: Jul 16, 2008 - 11:39 AM EST Subject: Walk a Mile in Another's Shoes.

He has, as you now know. Does that change anything?

"I have great respect for Mr. Sowell, but his consistent condemenation of autism is starting to wear thin."

You can't mean condemnation of autism, can you?

"This is not the first article Mr. Sowell has written negatively about the issue."

Correct. He wrote a two-part series in Nov 2007 on the dangers of attributing autism where it isn't (false positives) and nothing at all on the subject in 2006, 2005, and 2004 as far as I could tell by the archives. Is this too much for you, and why you call it "consistent"? Perhaps he sees the need to follow up to increase awareness.

I know parents of autistic children, so I also can see how devasting it would be for a family to get a false positive on a child for any disease including that one, especially if it got in the way of treatment for the correct diagnosis (which might even be that nothing's wrong).

Observe and Others
Just like flying saucers and aliens, the fact that the vast majority of cases are fake, fraud and mistaken identity does not mean that ALL of them are.

I am sure that there are Autistic children and I heartily sympathize with anyone whose child is damaged in any way.

I am also sure that 'autistic' is the new Race Card and that lots of parents who are simply frustrated by a child who is "not what we wanted" or who cannot deal with the undeniable truth that when you have a child you have to stop doing some of the things that you did when you were childless, and if they say their child is 'autistic' then it means nobody who just paid $100 for a concert ticket is entitled to complain when the child shrieks relentlessly thoroughout. Ditto for the parents now filing suit against a church because they actually had to sit on their autistic child, who urinated on the church floor as well as assaulting others in the pew, and refused to consider those around them. Yes, your life is difficult. Yes, I am sorry and I understand, as well as I can. I refuse to pretend your child is behaving normally and not disturbing me; and if I have advance warning, I will avoid the situation. Do you have to tell the airlines that your child is Autistic before you get on an international flight? If not, do you tell them? Do you think perhaps it would be a kindness to people who might wish to change their reservation rather than listen to your child scream for 7 or 8 hours, regardless of the reason?

Cathy
I read the article. I don't see that any conclusions were drawn from studies.

Cathy: "Among the Amish, the only cases of autism found were among those children who had some exposure to either mercury or vaccines."

Interesting. Can you reference the actual study? All I can find is ancedotal evidence (from a reporter) and conjecture. Has anyone considered that the relatively closed Amish gene pool which gives them other diseases at a much higher rate might come into play?

I used to play with mercury from thermostats as a kid, rubbing it on coins to shine them up.

Amish redux, with comments
http://autism-news-beat.com/?p=29


AudiR10
You are mistaken -- the vast majority of cases are not fakes or frauds. I repeat -- if you ever had a close relative or friend with an autistic child, you would think differently. Nobody likes to have to sit through a plane flight with a shrieking child, but if that child is autistic maybe you should think about what it would mean to have to cope with and care for and love that child every day. Maybe it would be an act of compassion on your part to the child and the parents.

No, I won't take it easy
Autism is an enigamatic disorder. As someone previously noted on this thread, "If you have met one person with autism, you have met one person with autism."

Dealing with autism is a process. As science tries to pin down exactly what the disorder is, how it develops, and create therapies for it, there are going to be problems along the way. It is no suprise to me that diagnoses of autism has increased. So has the diagnoses of mulitple other conditions as ongoing research and development has progressed. Does that mean we should discount the disorder itself because the road to the best diagnostic tools and treatment is problematic? It appears from the comments on this thread, many believe we should because they disavow that a spectrum of autism exists in the first place.

To give some a clue of what it is like to deal with this disease, let me give you one example. A few weeks ago, my daughter had what we have come to refer to as "An Autism Moment." I was driving my kids to a local swimming pool. My daughter out of an inappropriate reaction to a perceived fear shrieked at the top of her lungs. In the shock of my reation to her outburst, I hit the accelerator rather than the break thus causing an accident. One nevers knows when things like this are going to happen. When episodes like this do occur, just as on this thread, the responses are unsympathic and often downright rude assuming I am a bad parent with an out of control child. If you haven't lived through the day in and day out struggle of this disease, you just don't have a clue.

So, no I won't take it easy. I will continue to be an advocate for families like mine because I know too well the reality of autism.

Dr. Sowell's Personal Experience
Dr. Sowell's son John was not talking by age 3 1/2, and his book 'Late Talking Children' chronicles the family's heartache and searching, visiting doctors and speech therapists, looking for answers. I came across the book at Barnes and Noble when I was in a similar searching mode when my 4yr old daughter was only talking a 'gibberish' type language. Sowell had written a column in 1993 about their family's experiences with John- which resulted in a flood of responses from families around the country in similar situations. They formed an informal support group and shared their struggles with the difficulty of an accurate diagnosis for their children. This group story, along with extensive appendix and footnotes, comprises the rest of the book. Many of the children, including John, grow up having normal (or higher) functioning and capabilities. I can certainly relate to his point in the first paragraph of this current column that an 'early' diagnosis of autism is not per se an 'accurate' one.

Jeff, I will remain empathetic to you
and all families of autistic children, even if you don't address my comments and continue to paint all of us with the same brush. Sowell is trying to help, and you are shooting at him and me inappropriately, which is what I meant by taking it easy and reflecting before you charge Sowell and everybody as being against you. Please don't let your plight close your mind to us. You need to detach a bit on that and refocus on the point of his column. I will pray for you.

BTW, you need empathy, not sympathy. There IS a difference. Empathetic people are the helpers.


My personal experience
I was diagnosed with autism as a child. I was four before I started talking. Up to that point the doctors wanted institutionalize me, but my parents refused. When I began talking I began talking in complete sentences and began reading immediately (my grandmother said that I might not have been talking, but I sure was paying attention). The doctors didn't see this as a miraculous "recovery", but wanted me to undergo psychiatric treatment and prescibed tranquilizers. My mother quickly discontinued the treatment when she saw its effect on me. The doctors told her I would always be "slow". I was so slow that I was always in the top 1% of my classes, if not on top, from kindergarden through college. I'm now a top engineer in cutting-edge R&D. I've gone from speaking no language to speaking several fluently.

My wife is concerned because our 2nd child isn't talking as early as our first. Our pediatrician is suggesting he might be autistic and recommending stict dietary regimens, but other than not talking I find him extremely communicative and bright. I've seen no hard evidence he is autistic and hesitate to implement treatments without proof. Maybe he's just "slow" like I was.

Jeff
Your comments indicate that you would prefer to dole out taxpayer dollars to anyone, period, claiming to have an autistic child. Typical of a liberal, you want no accountability for our tax dollars even though you (and your child) stand to benefit the most by reducing fraud. Clearly, your political leanings compel you to demonize this compassionate intellectual at the expense of true autism sufferers, misdiagnosed (and mis-labeled) children, medical personnel, and taxpayers.

Autism
I just read every comment made referring to Sowell's autism article. Some people must not have read carefully. Sowell did NOT say that real autism cases don't exist. He didn't even say that there weren't real autism cases in his group. He did indicate that many (not all) were not real. That, to me, is a useful input by an observant person who dedicated effort over time. It does nothing to deny or diminish any person connected with an individual with an actual real case of autism, and no case of autism, no matter how severe, is evidence of any faulty thinking on Sowell's part. I do agree with those thoughtful comments pointed out that the severest cases are best helped by weeding out the false cases that shouldn't be deflecting aid from the truly afflicted. Plus no child deserves an improper diagnosis.

Still Disagree
I can only speak of my experience and of those homeschooling families with whom I have contact who unfortunately had similar experiences. Ours was not an issue of early misdiagnosis from an overzealous medical and or educational community. Rather, we continually fought with the medical and educational establishment to take seriously what we as parents already knew, that something was wrong with a child. For every child misdiagnosed at an early age, there are just as many who missed out on early and much needed intervention because the parents were told "wait and see." If you don't believe me, attend a homeschooling conference or seminar. We didn't start out advocates of homeschooling but arrived at the destination out of frustration trying to get appropriate help for our children.

Rich D, I did read the articles by Mr. Sowell in November 2007. I chimed in on the thread in response to those articles just like I am now. The broad brush also applies to Mr. Sowell. As a result of Sowell's experiences, he believes early diagnosis is inappropriate and damaging. If I had taken the "wait and see" approach Sowell believes is appropriate, our daughter would have suffered socially and academically from the lack of intervention and therapy.

The problem, though, as Jeff is trying
to point out, is that early intervention is CRITICAL to the success of therapy with an autistic child. Because of the way the brain develops, intervention at 2 is massively better than intervention at 6. Maybe there is a risk of "overidagnosis", and it is certainly a good idea for diagnostic techniques to be refined, but some overidagnosis may be the price that is to be paid for catching autism early and intervening. If it is autism, "wait and see" means losses that may not ever be overcome, or if overcome, only with greater difficulty and at more cost.

Jeff
You can't be suggesting that we pump our children full of ritalin at the first sign of introspective behavior? Many people do...

I agree, but
observe1234
Date: Jul 16, 2008 - 6:23 PM EST The problem, though, as Jeff is trying
to point out, is that early intervention is CRITICAL to the success of therapy with an autistic child.

================================================

And Dr Sowell agrees with that, the problem is many do called experts have concocted half-baked methods of diagnosing and treating these children and claiming claiming high rates of success in "curing" autism, based on case studies. Problem is they were treating children that didn't have autism. These same snake oil salesmen then destroy the lives of children that truly have autism when their "proven" methods cause irreparable harm.

"If a child is not autistic to begin with, almost anything will "cure" him with the passage of time."


No, No, No .....
"You can't be suggesting that we pump our children full of ritalin at the first sign of introspective behavior? Many people do..."

NO, I am not suggesting that. Quite the opposite. Drugs are too easily a cop out and not an ultimate fix for the problem.

Again, I will use our experience to explain. Our daugther is mildly autistic and has an high IQ. Unfortunately, as with many mildly autistic children she has co-exisiting issues such as "percieved dyslexia" and an auditory processing problem. "Percieved dyslexia" is the term used because she exhibits many of the symptoms of a true dyslexic but does not fit the full criteria for the diagnosis.

Our approach has been multi-faceted. She has been in counseling to deal with anxiety and social issues. As part of counseling, she was in a social therapy group to teach her skills like cueing into body language, etc. that others come by naturally. We utilized specialized reading program to help overcome reading and spelling problems. She is quirky. She reads at grade level, writes creatively, but still struggles with spelling despite all our efforts. Some think this is quakery but we utilized therapy with a behavioral ophthamalogist to help her eyes track effectively which helped the dyslexic type issues.

Everything we have provided has been on our nickel because the public school system deemed her "too high functioning to qualify for special education." We have existed in what I call the "Mild Autism No Man's Land." A place where the child is capable but needs help, but because she is not severly autistic doesn't qualify for help. Although the neurolgist suggested drug intervention, we refused. We believed therapy and other interventions were better.

Medical student syndrome
Many posters here are experiencing what I call "Medical Student Syndrome".

When reading a list of symptoms of an illness, many med students worry that they may have that illness, because they can identify with many of the symptoms. Many of the posters here say that their children exhibited signs of autism or Asperger's Syndrome. That does not mean that a qualified professional would misdiagnose the child.

Most of my friends have similar interests and personalities to mine, and as such when I described Asperger's to them for the first time they wondered if they had the same problem, or if it was even a problem at all.

But there is a world of difference between being somewhat compulsive and reclusive, and having a Pervasive Developmental Disorder, which is what all forms of autism are.

St Sebastian
Ironically, an autistic kid would probably remember the color of Gatsby's car, but completely miss the point of the novel.

Just to Clarify...Additional Information
Our daughter attended kindergarten and first grade in a public school. It was during this time that we finally got a more definitve diagnosis. We were told when she was two to "wait and see" which we did. We were told, "If she truly has a problem it will exhibit itself in kindergarten." It did when the kindergarten teacher told me, "..... is on another planet, I need her here on earth with me." Despite the teacher's complaints, I still had to push the school to bring in the school psychologist to observe our daughter. That was the first time anyone mentioned to us the possibility of autism.

It became painfully obvious when our daughter spent recess running around in circles to the point of making herself physcially ill as a result of stress in the classroom that the public school system wasn't going to work.

The rest of our efforts I have already mentioned in previous posts. For anyone to suggest that what we have been through is false or could have been avoided by waiting for our daughter to mature is ridiculous.

Early intervention vs. misdiagnosis
This seems to be the point of contention among those who aren't sidetracked onto vaccination and other issues.

I understand the concern about getting a child diagnosed early so as to receive necessary help, but are you referring to children who are obviously autistic? Children, as some of you have described, who have severe and debilitating issues? (I hope I'm not wording this offensively.)

But if you have a child who is a late talker, has odd styles of play, and isn't social... that does NOT mean they are autistic. But I will tell you that based on my description of my son as a late talker and not very social, and on the fact that he jumped up and down and flapped his little arms in excitement over spinning toys, some IDIOTIC doctor diagnosed him as PDD-NOS, on the 'autistic spectrum.' This doctor would not listen when I mentioned that my son had constant ear infections which affected his hearing and therefore his talking, and that his dad is rather the brainy 'nerd' type.

Nope, ignore Mom and slap a label on the kid. PDD-NOS, for those who don't know, means pervasive developmental disorder, not otherwise specified, and is on the autism spectrum.

For those of you who have autistic kids, no one - or at least none of the vast number of reasonable people on the board who are agreeing with Dr. Sowell instead of beating their favorite dead horses - no one is saying autism is anything but very real and very painful. It's this tendency to take every kid who doesn't fit into their nice, neat boxes and label them on the autistic spectrum that is a problem.

Living with Autism
Let me start by saying that I appreciate Dr. Sowell's view when it comes to diagnosing autism. I've personally known a child who completely lost the label after less than two years. Spontaneous recovery? A miracle? Probably misdiagnosis. Make no mistake, though, living with autism is one of the most difficult things in the world. I have two boys on the spectrum: one with Asperger's (who gets no services at all) and one with mild/moderate autism. His behaviors have greatly improved over the years, but there was a fair amount of head banging, tantrums, smearing of unmentionable things, etc. He would spend hours looking at the fan and laughing uncontrollably. We didn't leave our house for a long time. I defy anyone to tell me my son was just a "brat." Careless, ugly comments like that make me wonder who raised some of the cold, unfeeling people out there. That being said, when my son had a tantrum in a restaurant, we left. No matter what the label, brat or autistic, a parent needs to set limits and take responsibility for out of control kids. As far as diagnosing, I know of a few cases where parents pushed and physicians gave in. Why one would want to do that, I'll never know. My sons are improving, life is better, and pray for the day that my kids are just quirky. All the best,

Robyn

Diagnosis
I am reminded of a professor I had for 201 Abnormal Psychology. He stated that we should not listen too closely to the symptoms of the various mental conditions we would discuss in class. Anyone can put together a list of quirks of personality, memory impairments, or family histories and come out with virtually any diagnosis in DSM IV.

His caution proved correct as many of the young women in my class would approach him from time to time to discuss various issues that remarkably resembled theirs. I could only smile.

The grab by school systems, academics, and NGOs for federal dollars is the power behind the wave of ADD, ADHD, etc. There are real cases that deserve real attention. However, at the rate American children are diagnosed with the various impairments, one would expect to see concordence rates in other western societies. We don't. What we do see are various constituencies jaw-locked on the teat of the federal pig. Oh, and parents who don't really want to do the hard part of parenting: raise their kid and tell them no.

Follow the MONEY? WHAT MONEY!
Jeff -- you are brilliant. I agree with your posts 100%. Thank you for saying, in a very civil and patient manner, what I would probably have posted in a less civil tone!

My son is PDD-NOS. It is his diagnosis -- and it is almost certainly accurate.

Anyone who thinks the "overdiagnosis" is driven by MONEY obviously does not have a child on the spectrum. There is VERY LITTLE money out there. The money is all on the side of the "Big-Pharm" vaccine makers.

Why do we give kids Hep-B vaccines? Why do we give Varicella vaccines? We WAY over-vaccinate our kids ...because THAT'S where the money is.

THERE IS NO MONEY IN AUTISM! That's part of the problem. And before Maximilian calls me a "liberal", I'll have you know I am a Reagan conservative. I am also a combat vet of OEF and OIF. I fully support the war and the surge and would have given my life for the cause and for my country -- but much prefer to make the terrorists and taliban die for their cause.

Government is a necessary evil. It should be kept to a minimum. However for "public goods", the government must exist or we will have anarchy. Our collective defense -- the military -- is a public good.

Well, a 1:150 epidemic of a debilitating neuro-biological disorder is a public crisis that needs to be addressed ...by the government. I know, part of me cringes as I type that. But it's true.

There is NO MONEY in autism research. That's why there is so little of it! Parents cannot afford ABA therapy, which can cost $10,000 to $50,000 per year, yet early intervention and ABA therapy is LIFE-ALTERING.

I don't want to make this post too long, so I'll leave it at that.

-Bob

D.Lee, Jeff - Pt. 1
"But if you have a child who is a late talker, has odd styles of play, and isn't social... that does NOT mean they are autistic. But I will tell you that based on my description of my son as a late talker and not very social, and on the fact that he jumped up and down and flapped his little arms in excitement over spinning toys, some IDIOTIC doctor diagnosed him as PDD-NOS, on the 'autistic spectrum"

Every one is right that just because a child "doesn't speak" doesn't equal autism. I am willing to even swallow you're characterization which includes "hand flapping" and, reluctantly, "socialization problems" (with much reservation), but everyone needs to understand that there really is such a thing as autism. And there really is such a thing as ADHD-impulsive.

Are there false diagnosises? Of course. But there are also far many more true diagnosises.

D. Lee, Jeff - Pt.2
The problem with dismissing no speech "in time" as being indicative of autism, is that with autism you have such things as echolalia and scripting. The absence of those in a child who is "slow to speak" would indicate that perhaps autism is not there.

Also, meltdowns are a clue. Often in autistic children/adults sensory integration issues are involved.

In the case of our daughter, not only is the lack of social skills a problem (she will frequently "play around kids" or push or hit them) but she is very violent. She will bite her wrists or ensure that she bites not just one knee but both knees. She also assaults us.

UNDERdiagnosis, not OVERdiagnosis!
Also, anyone who thinks that OVERdiagnosis accounts for a significant percentage of kids diagnosed on the spectrum obviously does not have a child on the spectrum.

Most doctors (even pediatricians) are remarkably uneducated about ASD -- particularly if they graduated from medical school more than 10 years ago.

Our son's pediatrician kept telling us nothing was wrong and, "let's wait and see." Finally, we switched doctors, got the necessary referral to a pediatric neurologist, and the accurate diagnosis PDD-NOS.

Turns out our son's new doctor has an autistic son. He later confided in me that he recognized our son as "autistic" within 30 seconds, but he didn't tell us that because he wanted the most accurate diagnosis possible -- by a neurologist.

How many parents defer to their doctor's "expertise" when they are first told to "wait and see."??? Many! Most, I'd say.

Trust me, any parent would PREFER to cling to the hope that their child is "normal" (neuro-typical), and just a "late talker". The tendency of a parent is NOT to seek an ASD label for your child! ...Maybe a parent with Munchausen-by-proxy would be an exception, but that's statistically insignificant.

Moreover, most doctors are still SLOW to diagnose ASD and slow to refer out for diagnosis.

Thus, it seems far more likely that ASD is UNDERdiagnosed than OVERdiagnosed.

I love Sowell. But the emphasis of his article is overdiagnosis of Autism. While overdiagnosis is something we should guard against, the GREATER SIN is underdiagnosis. Early intervention is CRUCIAL to the long-term outcomes for these children!!!

D. Lee, Jeff - Pt.3
My point here is that, while there are undoubtedly misdiagnosises, we should not allow that to over shadow the need for autism awareness.

Too many posters here are stuck on the possibility of misdiagnosis/bad parents and are ignorantly ignoreing the authentic cases.

I have zero doubts as to my daughter's diagnosis of autism/epilepsy/ADDHD-Impulsive.

There are autistics among our midst in society and they deserve our understanding and acceptance regardless of thier disability.

Jeff,

My e-mail address is complices@suddenlink.net if you would like to correspond off-line regarding our shared experience with autism.

The mirrof of your soul
Audi10 says:

"I am convinced that autism is the Child version of the Race Card; it is an excuse for the parents to avoid responsibility for controlling their children or respecting the community. Just play the Autism Card and presto! Your child cannot be disciplined!"

****
Tenore2 replies:

So speaks someone who is in need of help, serious help!

While I have read several of "her" posts that I thought were positive in nature, the comments she has posted relative to this subject lead me to believe she has some problems of a negative nature. True "autism" is a real condition that very few face. My wife and I have faced this daily for the past 25 years.

Does my wife feel sorry for her "affliction", that of raising and caring for our daughter?

She does not; just the opposite; she adores our daughter and seldom complains about the difficulties she faces as a mother.

Do I feel sorry for myself? No I do not.

Am I ashamed to bring my daughter into the "real" world?

I am not!

Do I stop attending Church because my daughter is often disruptive?

No, and she goes with us.

Those, who attend my church love and accept her as a child of God. A God who may resent those who resent His "special" spirits.

Truly autistic children and adults are "little children" and if you are a Christian you should know how He feels about children. This applies to all of the Special people.

Earlier I posted; if you will become familiar with truly autistic, Downs Syndrome, etc. children or adults you will be blessed.

There are many who work hard to help the "special." Our daughter is blessed with very special people who work for low pay, but have high standards.

So, Audi10, and others, look in the mirror of your soul; I hope you will not be disappointed.

Quackery?
As for the comments about the "quacks"...

Quacks aren't allowed to diagnose ASD. ASD can only be diagnosed by a Psychologist or Psychiatrist after administering a battery of cognitive tests, or by a Neurologist after a CT-scan, office eval., and brain wave study to rule out epilepsy and fragile-x.

So that's really quite a stupid line of reasoning to assert that quacks are driving “overdiagnosis”. The "quacks" may prey on sufferers AFTER they have been diagnosed, but that does not drive rates of diagnosis.

QUACKERY?
Sure, DAN doctors are a little quack-ish in my opinion. But most of them aren't doing it for the money. They left more lucrative traditional M.D. practices for less-lucrative DAN practices because they wanted to give hope and pursue reasonable theories about the causes of autism. "Magnet therapy" and "the power of crystals" is nuts, but some DAN theories actually work for some kids; like casein-free/gulten-free diets.

We don't use a DAN doctor, but DAN doctors should be APPLAUDED for what they have done to drive the national debate on Autism to the point where Autism is now almost universally recognized as a BIO-MEDICAL disorder rather than a PSYCHOLOGICAL disorder.

Remember, "Mainstream medicine" used to blame "refrigerator mothers" and blamed Kanner-type autism on bad parenting.

Mainstream medicine used to think "stress" caused ulcers... but we have learned that h.pylori is the culprit.

Mainstream medicine used to scoff at the idea that a virus could cause cancer. Yet we now know that Hep-B causes hepatocellular carcinoma, and HPV causes cervical cancer.

Mainstream medicine used to think Tuberculosis was a "conversion disorder".

Today's quack is sometimes tomorrow's Salk.

Of course, today's quack is often still tomorrow's quack.

But the bottom line is so-called "quacks" are not driving the epidemic of Autism. They CAN'T possibly do so, because "quacks" have no input at the point of diagnosis.

Phil Gramm was right.
We have become a nation of whiners that will invent a illness that cover all normal child behavior. ADD, ADT, ASD, hyperactivity, and 50 other described problems.

Children are hyper normally, children have short attention spans normally, children get angry (frustrated) naturally, some children do not talk until age 3-4 normally, and we develop false treatment plans for them. Just admit they will grow out of the problem if they are loved and given time to learn.

So lets stop whining, drugging our kids, and making excuses for bad behavior (NORMAL). All people are not created equally and kids are people.

WHO SAID IT'S EASY??
Unfortunately, in our "who cares about personal accountability" society, the ease of blaming your child's problems in behavior on a "disease" is all too compelling. You get so much more sympathy and it's so much easier to look to something/someone else (the goverment!) to blame or help you solve your problems. Let's face it, it's HARD to raise good and well-behaved children. You actually have to BE THERE, PROVIDE RULES AND BOUNDARIES AND LOVE, AND BE CONSISTENT. It's much easier and more immediately satisfying to be on your cell phone, watching TV, or thinking about going out to the clubs on Saturday night (I'll bet you're a single parent, too!) After all, you're just so busy!

For those with autistic children
Of course autism is real.

As I said before, no one -except those who are dragging out their favorite dead horses to beat and we can spot them a mile off and ignore them- no one is denying that your child is truly autistic, as opposed to undisciplined, wrongly vaccinated, etc. etc.

But, there are also a lot of parents and children who have suffered through a misdiagnosis. My son has never done any of the violent or screaming things. To use Robyn's delightful term, my son is 'quirky.'

If I hadn't homeschooled him, we would have been labeled, put in a special ed class, and made to think there was something wrong with him. He didn't need it and probably would have been irrevocably harmed by it, as others have been.

Misdiagnosis does exist, and it's a terrible disservice to the child and parents involved. It can needlessly devastate both parent and child, as well as the child's future.

That is all Dr. Sowell was saying. You don't need to defend the legitimacy of your child's disorder to Dr. Sowell or any of the reasonable people on this board.

God only knows how decrepant America is!
With all due respect to all the ones who already posted comments plus the writer of the article istself, the fact remains that humans today, especially in the the western culture with the USA leading out more and more treat procreation way below the animal kingdom.

On top of it is what humans more and more eat and drink. Not to mention that for instance, America consumes about one half of the world's mood-altering and painkilling pharmaceuticals and two thirds of of the world's illegal drugs while only 4-5% of the world's population. Sadly in reality the driving force behind it all, is money!

In the meantime, in America especially, thousands if not million upon million books have and are being written and speeches given and yet things are only getting worse, while humanity disregards more and more human nature and forces upon itself more and more a truly satanic humanistic life style below the Animal kingdom, I repeat.

skules and munny
Up here in NW PA, last visited by a president when Geo. Washington was surveying the area, autism (and its spectrum) has replaced ADHD as the method of choice for icreased school funding.
This area has a declining, aging population, and most job creation is either in elder care or the school district. We are a town of 7,500 people and THREE senior centers.
The point of this is that the local school board takes it literally that "Children are our most precious assets". Frankly, some kids are worth more than others in our very convoluted "No Child Gets Ahead" system.
My wife has five grandchildren in local elementary schools---four have some colors of the autism spectrum, though one of them tested in the 95th percentile in third grade. I'm convinced the real problem is PARENTAL attentnion deficit disorder, but having autistic kids takes the onus from them of having to deal with what, 40 years ago, were decribed by the nuns as "disciplinary problems." Meanwhile these nitwits (the parents) are working 60 and 70 hour weeks to pay for all their toys, thus leaving my wife (who is retired on disability) to work 60 hours
a week raising their kids.
The spike in autism diagnosis can be compared to the ADHD spike in the 90s. We just found a new source of funding.

mental health and kids
My eldest son was diagnosed with all kinds of different disorders when he was young and, looking back on it, I don't believe there was really anything wrong with him. You can find just about any of the "symptoms" of ADHD in any kid.

He took several different medications, all with serious side effects. I regret to this day doing any of it. It never helped him in school and I've always wondered if some of the side effects changed him permanently. He's 22 now and hasn't taken any medication for 7 years. He has a good job and his bosses really like him.

My daughter was also diagnosed with ADHD. She's now 16 and we decided with her to take her off of her medication a couple of years ago. She is really hyper, but I think she's just a naturally high-energy kid. I wish I had some of it! She channels that energy into dance and music and it works just fine.

My son was really difficult to deal with when he was little. However, I think if I had just waited it out, he would have had an easier time.

Can you really have a mental diagnosis on kids under 5? How accurate can that be given the different grow and maturity rates? Personality differences? I think it would be better to value the quirks and wait and see, than jump to medicate.

The "spectrum" of autism
I suspect that autism, like ADD, ADHD, and any number of other conditions, may represent the extreme end of a trait we all have. Most people have some characteristics of all of these conditions, but only when they are present in extreme amounts is there cause for worry.

In the same way, we all have measurable levels of blood sugar. By the reasoning underlying autism "checklists", we're all on the "spectrum" of diabetes. But only those whose blood sugar levels spend time above a certain level have any cause for concern.

MRCMRC translated...
...for the rest of us:

"I have to make a comment about autism, and ADD as well, and -- oh, look! A recession!"

Common Sense...
1. LL in Colorado said: "I think it would be better to value the quirks and wait and see, than jump to medicate."

RESPONSE: What do you mean MEDICATE? Who medicates autistic kids? Maybe someone knows LESS about this topic than you, but I doubt it. Oh, wait, here's someone...

2. Everyman in Pennsylvania said: "I'm convinced the real problem is PARENTAL attentnion [sic] deficit disorder, but having autistic kids takes the onus from them of having to deal with […] 'disciplinary problems.' Meanwhile these nitwits (the parents) are working 60 and 70 hour weeks to pay for all their toys".

RESPONSE: Everyman, you are the "nit-wit" (…times a hundred). I say that out of love, in the sense that you "nothing-know." But please don't let that stop you from chiming in! On the positive side, you make LL in Colorado look like "change we can believe in." LL should send you some Rocky Mountain Oysters as a little "thank you" for replacing him in the dunce chair.

Thank goodness! Here comes Nancy in Texas to save the day with some good old fashioned common sense...

Common Sense...
3. Nancy in Texas said: "Unfortunately, in our 'who cares about personal accountability' society, the ease of blaming your child's problems in behavior on a 'disease' is all too compelling. [I]t's so much easier to look to something/someone else (the goverment!) [nice spelling there Nance! ...can I call you "Nance"?] to blame or help you solve your problems. Let's face it, it's HARD to raise good and well-behaved children. You actually have to BE THERE, PROVIDE RULES AND BOUNDARIES AND LOVE, AND BE CONSISTENT. It's much easier and more immediately satisfying to be on your cell phone, watching TV, or thinking about going out to the clubs on Saturday night (I'll bet you're a single parent, too!) After all, you're just so busy!

Wonderful insight Nancy; sheer genius! If autistic kids' parents would simply stop going to rave parties every weekend, autism could be cured. Whodathunk?! I'll have to detox from my ketamine habit, of course. ...And just think of the money I'll save on glow sticks!

You have done the impossible TWICE, Nance ...can I call you "Nance"? You have cured Autism and made LL and Everyman look smart - all in one post!

Censorship = B.S.!
To show everyone how stupid it can be, Townhall's censoring software/program caught the alleged word "a-s-s" in the Supreme Court case cite:
Citizens’ Savings & Loan A-s-s’n v. City of Topeka, 87 U.S. 655 (1874).
That type of control-freak censorship is almost as s-t-u-p-i-d as steal-and-redistribute socialism!
Everybody knows how to get around the program anyway, so why not ratchet down a notch or two?

Gideon, Pt. 1
"whatever you subsidize (e.g. autism) you WILL get more of."

While I am a conservative, and do feel that Government has grown beyond the boundaries set for it by the Constitution, and I definately don't appreciate the way the government wastes our tax money on programs such as the National Endowment of the Arts, and National Public Radio, (to name a few), I do make an exception for the disabled of our society.

While I can appreciate some money being spent on research for a cure, what is most needed is funds to assists families with ABA treatment and also to help beyond just the age of 18 with things like assisted living.

Gideon, Pt.2
Of course, there needs to be an effective way to screen recipients to ensure that their case is genuine, and that the parents are actually financially incapable of paying for such services.

I don't mind my tax money going to help someone who is genuinely disabled live as well as possible. I do disagree with the liberal socialist/communist ideals that give my tax money to people who don't deserve it and who are just too lazy and unwilling to work for themselves.

Of course, since I have an autistic child, it can be pointed out that I have a vested interest in wanting the government to assist the disabled. So be it.

Jeff
"As a result of Sowell's experiences, he believes early diagnosis is inappropriate and damaging."

We will disagree - the article doesn't say that. An early diagnosis of any disease is obviously appropritate. He was quoting a physician who said that many early diagnoses were incorrect.

As far as the spike goes, it was about 8 to 1(!) over a ew years and correlated with a loosening of the diagnostic criteria.

Why are some thinking that the only options are do everything by two years of age or do nothing until six?

Limited Options
"Why are some thinking that the only options are do everything by two years of age or do nothing until six?"

You are correct this seems to be the two options. It makes sense to me that folks would see it this way. From my experience most of the parents who recognized that something was wrong did so when their child was around the age of two. This is when they started questioning and pursuing answers. Some recieved a diagnosis and moved forward from this point.

Others like myself were told "wait and see" with success or problems in kindergarten being the opportunity to make a diagnosis.

For those children who are severe-moderately autistic it more observable by an early age, so a diagnosis is easier to make. For those of us with children with Asperger's Syndrome, Non-Verbal Language Development Disorder, or PDD (the terms generally used for mildly autistic children)the symptoms are more subtle thus making an early diagnosis more difficult.

The problem seems to be fine tuning the diagnostic tools for children who are at the mild end of the spectrum. Again, the earlier the intervention the better the outcome for the child. The problem is getting the most accurate diagnosis at the earliest age possible. I firmly believe the diagnotic issue will continue to be a messy process with debate similar to what is on this thread until the diagnotic tools and therapies improve. My prayer is that this will happen sooner rather than later.




Jeff - best of luck
I am nowhere near as heartless as I may have initially sounded to some parents of autistic children.
I have no problem whatsoever with VOLUNTARILY helping others (and I do give as much to charities as I can). My problem is with individuals who, for whatever reason or "victimology" talking point, assume a destructively socialistic mindset, and believe they have a moral right to use the police powers of the state to steal and redistribute property from others to benefit themselves.
In my previous post, I was simply reciting the "mechanics/mathematics" of what I perceive to be the empirically observable immutable natural laws of the cause-and-effect, survival-of-the-fittest universe we live in.
I like to tell my students that if they want to understand what's going on in human society, keep their eye/focus on what's real. If you really want to know what's real, just imagine you are the only human being on the face of the earth. In that case, if you have a problem, either 1) you will suck it up and learn how to handle it, or 2) it won't get handled.
There are all kinds of misfortunes and unfortunate people in the world. So be it. But in the long run, the cause-and-effect mechanics of the universe, combined with the inherent survival need of the human individual for self-ownership and self-determination, dictate that no individual-freedom-based society can function with everybody competing against everybody else for the political power with which to steal and redistribute property from the "other guy" to benefit himself, even for so-called "worthwhile" causes.
That's why charity rules and police-power coercion in non-criminal matters drools!

I meant Clay, not Jeff - sorry
I was responding to Clay's post, not Jeff's.
Sorry for the careless haste.

Autism
"There are all kinds of misfortunes and unfortunate people in the world. So be it. But in the long run, the cause-and-effect mechanics of the universe, combined with the inherent survival need of the human individual for self-ownership and self-determination, dictate that no individual-freedom-based society can function with everybody competing against everybody else for the political power with which to steal and redistribute property from the "other guy" to benefit himself, even for so-called "worthwhile" causes.
That's why charity rules and police-power coercion in non-criminal matters drools!
Flag as Offensive"

So, basically, in your opinion, the autistics amongst our midst, are to be cast aside, while those who treat pets as humans get a pass?


Consider yourself 'flagged'
I want to 'flag' Michael Savage, Thomas Sowell and everything to do with this website and all radio stations associated with it as 'offensive'. Is there somewhere I can click to do that? My husband and I used to listen to these radio shows. Never again will our radios go anywhere near these stations nor will you find us on this website again. I am not one for being overly 'politically correct', but this is disgusting and ignorant.

Amanda
Who are you responding to? The "Flag as Offensive" at the end of my last comment was a mistake. When I copied the text from Gideon's post above mine, I accidentally caught up the "Flag as Offensive" option below his post.

I didn't mean to imply that I was intending to flag him. He, like everyone here has a right to voice their opinion.

"sPECTRUM"
There is nothing more annoying than these 'catch phrases being used in assessing children. Most of the 'less thorough" therapists throw these terms out with such ease and regularity they are almost as useless as a post game sports interview when the athlete vows to take things "one game at a time" or "We gave 110% out there Today". We are all on the "Spectrum" it is just a matter of degree. I refused to let one of these babblers continue the assesment of my child at about thirty months and then again at 5 years because of the non-specific verabage. the could have been talking about me as much as my son by the body of the first two paragraphs.
It is one thing to ask a parent to be attentive to certain traits or areas that the child might want to focus on in their developement but, to labe someone who my very well just be slightly delayed in a specific area could be potential harmful both long and short term. I have twins and one was considered 'gifted and the other on the 'spectrum'. If you met them now I would wager that the vote would be 50/50 on who was labeled what.
I am not anti-therapy or clinician-my wife is one- but,labels are dangerous and damaging.

Late Talking
My youngest brother didn't start talking much until he was four, but we all knew why -- my sister wouldn't let him get a word in edgewise. He didn't talk until she went to kindergarten. Now he has a PhD.


Corbett and others
Late talking by itself is not an indicator of autism. There are other characteristics that must be present to legitimize a diagnosis of autism. With regards to speech, the presence of echolalia and scripting would point more toward autism. But again, speech development isn't the only criteria.

Late talking and autism intervention
As a parent of an autistic child, I'm glad to see the word getting out about late talking and autism. Late talking by itself has little to do with autism. The parent's excrutiating dilemna is: how do you know if your child will "grow out of it"? If you "wait and see" until the child is 5 years old, its too late to do the early intervention that has been proven effective. Let me comment that there are control groups in the good studies done on early autism intervention. If the intervention was having little or no effect, then similar success rates would be showing up in the control groups who received no intervention. This is not the case, so early intervention (before the age of 4) does work.

Autism
Our 5 1/2 yr old granddaughter STOPPED speaking within 5 days of rec. her flu vaccine at 18 months. She is still not talking, making gutteral sounds. Waiting to see if your child is "just late talking" instead of seeking early intervention is a tragedy!! There are many other signs to indicate autism & to relyy on one, being nonverbal, would not make sense. As for seeking the diagnosis to get money is a lauh! Can't even get most insurance companies to pay for intervention or testing. The gov't doesn't "hand out" dollars because your child has autism. We are conservatives, not liberals seeking to be on the government dole. More sensitivity regarding little ones in the "hell" & their families would be nice. USUALLY enjoy your articles & books but you struck out with this one.

Poor Dr. Sowel
Still getting blasted for things he did NOT say.

Rich D.
I agree with you. I think some of the responses here, especially mine, weren't aimed at Mr. Sowell, but rather at the commenters here on the blog, particularily those who seem to think that late speech is an indication of autism or even worse that autism is not real and parents are just playing "the autism card" to excuse their child's behavior.

Clay, certainly it's real -
one of my music teachers has an autistic son. Dr. Sowell's point is that we need to make sure that what little money is being spent is effectively used. Too much is spent on bridges to nowhere and extra-constitutional junk to buy votes. Too much is also spent on mostly preventable "favored" political diseases, like AIDS, and the male/female spending ratio is way out of balance. Try finding out how much is spent on male breast cancer per incidence vs. female. When was the last time you saw a walkathon for prostate cancer?

I have no problem increasing funding (correctly) by getting rid of most foreign aid, all earmarks, and useless alphabet agencies. Reduce my taxes and let the states pick up more.

Rich D.
I agree with you whole-heartedly. My beef is not with you nor Dr. Sowell. It's the rest of the igorant posters here.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.