Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
Terence Jeffrey :: Townhall.com Columnist
McCain's No Threat to the Left
by Terence Jeffrey
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What do you think of John McCain's selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate?



While the liberal establishment may be conflicted over whether it wants Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama as the Democratic presidential nominee, there's no doubt which Republican it favors.

John McCain is the liberal elite's go-to guy in the GOP. They believe he'll be there for them when they need him.

That was the essential message of last week's New York Times editorial endorsing McCain for the Republican nomination.

"With a record of working across the aisle to develop sound bipartisan legislation, he would offer a choice to a broader range of Americans than the rest of the Republican field," said the Times. "We have shuddered at McCain's occasional, tactical pander to the right because he has demonstrated that he has the character to stand on principle."

What the Times is saying here is that it does not take McCain's conservative campaign-season rhetoric seriously. No, they're convinced the man on the Straight Talk Express is railroading Republican primary voters.

Long experience has taught the Times to read McCain's sign language. No matter what contortions McCain undergoes to shape this language, its message is reassuringly constant from the left's point of view. It says: I am no threat to the liberal agenda.

Two Senate votes taken a day apart are illustrative. On June 7, 2006, McCain voted against a cloture motion that would have allowed the full Senate to vote yes or no on the Federal Marriage Amendment. Then, on June 8, 2006, he voted for a cloture motion that would have allowed the full Senate to vote yes or no on the Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act, which would have allowed Native Hawaiians to create a race-based separate nation within the United States.

In both instances, McCain voted with Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, and against most Senate Republicans.

McCain professed deep support for the underlying purpose of the marriage amendment, he just opposed allowing colleagues to vote on it. Conversely, he expressed deep opposition to the underlying purpose of the Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act -- he just supported allowing colleagues to vote on it. Each time, McCain gave rhetoric to the right and material cooperation to the left.

In the process, he demonstrated radical inconsistency in his willingness to defend federalism, a principal he says is at the core of his beliefs. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor-in-chief of CNSNews

Be the first to read Terence Jeffrey's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Subject: China
Myopine. Chinese tones using this keyboard 1,2,3,4,0. See how easy that is?

So for example since the only difference between buy and sell is the tone you can write it as mai(3) or mai(4). So the phrase dui niu tan qin could be written as dui(4) niu (2) tan (2) qin (2)

But usually when Chinese is Romanized outside of textbooks for teaching Chinese the tones are not indicated. In the cases when it is the tone marks in published works are . for zero, _ for first tone, / for second, v for third and \ for fourth as printed as a subscript above the Romanization such as mai or mài. And if TH like better websites would correctly display Chinese and you could actually tell the difference between jianti and fanti, you'd know I wasn't a "chicom (what a stupid hackneyed term). Care to re-read my comments on Taiwan? Does that sound like a "chicom" to you? But since you don't know anything, how would you even know this?

Also from a formal point of view the PRC isn't communist although the party is in Chinese known as Zhong Guo Gong Chan Dang which is translated as the Chinese Communist Party, but I will not get into more details why the PRC can't be accurately described as communist. Also, Mandarin is spoken in Taiwan as the official language (known as guoyu--the national language), Singapore (an offical language with English and Malay and Tamil), Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, Canada, the US among others. Being a non-Korean speaker, I'd have no idea how to write that phrase--Korean and Chinese aren't even in the same language family.




Better than I expected
Some worked..some didn't...better than I expected.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.