Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, September 18, 2009
Rich Tucker :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Growing Grip of Government
by Rich Tucker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

It used to be that if somebody did a poor job but didn’t want to fix it, he’d shrug and say, “Well, that’s good enough for government work.” But these days, that’s the problem. Too much of our work is government work. In everything from housing to high finance, the hand of government is pulling the strings.

“Over 29 years in business, we’ve always thought of ourselves as being in the free-enterprise system,” Peter Lansing, president of a Colorado mortgage firm, recently told The Wall Street Journal. “Today I think of myself as a government contractor.”

Arguing with Idiots By Glenn Beck

And indeed he is. Lansing says some 80 percent of the loans his company handles are now backed by the Federal Housing Administration. That number was 20 percent a few years ago.

Nationwide, the Journal reports, the FHA backs a quarter of all loans, up from 2.7 percent in 2006. Apparently, federal involvement in the mortgage markets worked out so well with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that Uncle Sam is giving it a third shot.

Who’s surprised that things look bleak?

The Mortgage Bankers Association reports that almost 8 percent of FHA loans were 90 days (or more) late or in foreclosure at the end of the second quarter. Just a year ago, that number was 5.4 percent. “They’re probably going to need a bailout at some point because they’re making loans in a riskier environment,” mortgage-industry consultant Edward Pinto told the Journal. As a former chief credit officer at Fannie Mae, he’s seen this film before, and adds, “I’ve never seen an entity successfully outrun a situation like this.”

Thus when it comes to housing, taxpayers may soon be saying, “Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me a third time, get ready for another federal bailout.”

Of course, it’s not just the housing market that’s in Washington’s hip pocket. So is high finance.

“The Treasury and the Federal Reserve are embroiled in everything from credit cards and home loans to auto manufacturing, from overseeing executive pay to shaping boards of directors,” a front-page story in The Washington Post reported on Sept. 13.

“In the old days, Washington was refereeing from the sideline,” Mohamed el-Erian, chief executive officer of Pimco, the world’s largest bond fund, told the paper. “In the new world we’re going toward, not only is Washington refereeing from the field, but it is also in some respects a player as well.”

And businesses are finding that Washington has an advantage: It doesn’t necessarily have to play by the same rules everybody else does. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Rich Tucker is an editor in Washington D.C. and a columnist for Townhall.com.

Be the first to read Rich Tucker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.< Sign up today!

Government Grip?
I don't think so. Just ask anyone what they are willing to give up or take less of:
- Are the recipents of Social Security of Medicare willing to take a cut in benefits?
- Are farmers willing to take less of a subsidy for their products?
- Are military contractors willing to take a cut in defense spending?
- Are southwestern states will to take a cut in border patrol activities?
- Are corporations willing to take a cut in corporate wellfare programs?
- Are you folks in your big fancy houses will to take a cut in your homestead exemptions?
- Are you religious types will to take less of a deduction for charitable contributions?
- Are the institutions of high learning will to take less federal dollars in the form of reduced college loans?
- Are all you folks who like to eat, willing to have fewer meat, fish, poultry and food processing plant inspectors?

The list of who gets what from the government goes on and on. . .the repugs were in office for 8 years; why did YOU not cut government spending when you had the chance? BECAUSE, all of the above mentioned folks would "get you" and our elected officials have no backbone for not spending money. Government grip - well, it seems we all like the benefits of government programs and well, YOU can cut someone elses's subsidy, just not mine.


Who's Pulling The Strings
It’s hard to tell who’s pulling the strings anymore.

Some say that “They” are pulling the strings. I have never been able to figure out exactly who “They” are.

I do know that people seem to blame a political Party, or an administration for things that “They” instigated.

Take global warming. Think of the laws, regulations, policies that are created to address something that no one knows for sure is an issue based upon good science.

Take the laws, regulations, restrictions, and policies that are established as a result of the environmentalist’s demands.

Have we ever considered that “They” are putting millions out of work, costing trillions of dollars in revenue, causing wars to be fought, there by affecting every Americans life?

Take Katrina in New Orleans; the Bush administration received criticism for not responding to a disaster that would not have turned into a disaster if the Corp of Engineers had been allowed to do the work that they were sent to do on the dikes.
But, guess who stopped them? “They” did it. The environmentalist’s stopped the project cold.
The millions of dollars were squandered by the governor of LA.
Take the wars for oil, the financial backing for terrorism, the energy crisis.
If we could drill for oil, we could break the financial backs of the Arab countries, put people to work, end the wars fought to stop terrorism and protect our access to oil.

Folks, we’ve got the oil, natural gas, and coal to last for decades, far enough into the future to develop other resources. But, guess what, “They” don’t want us to drill.

So, when you look at your problems today, ask “They” why he’s decided that it’s better that your son die in a war to stop terrorists, or protect oil reserves, or why your child should be deprived of healthcare so that the snail can live undisturbed in it’s natural habitat.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.