Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, April 04, 2008
Rich Tucker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Facts About the Tax
by Rich Tucker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Ah, springtime, when a young man’s thoughts turn to -- paying taxes.

This year, many of us will get a treat. Not long after we cut a check to the IRS on April 15, we’ll get a big check back from Washington. It’s a special “economic stimulus” package, passed in record time this winter by lawmakers who say they aim to bolster our economy -- and certainly hope to gain our vote in the fall.

How’s the government going to pay for this? Simple. It’ll just borrow the money from future taxpayers so it can “give” us all more money today. But this approach gets things exactly backward. The problem with our economy isn’t that the government “gives” us too little. It’s that Washington takes too much away.

Let’s consider a time, within living memory, when the country really was dealing with a crisis. A friend recently stumbled across a 1040 from the year 1943. There were a few things going on that year.

The U.S. was at war with Germany, Italy and Japan. Our troops led an allied invasion of Sicily in Europe, and battled the Japanese in the Aleutians, the Solomon Islands and on Tarawa Atoll. The three-day invasion of Tarawa killed 1,000 Americans and left another 2,000 wounded.

Back home, the government rationed fat, meat and cheese (so there would be enough to feed the troops) and implemented a freeze on wages and prices (to try to prevent inflation). In short, the entire country was mobilized in a fight it simply had to win.

That’s what makes reading this 1040 especially interesting. The taxpayer, who lived in Longview, Washington with a wife and two children, worked for Weyerhauser. He earned $2,635 (less than $52 a week) and paid $142.86 in taxes.

With the country hanging in the balance, this man’s tax burden was slightly more than 5 percent of his income, and that includes $38.86 for a special “Victory Tax.” There wasn’t a Martin Luther King Day holiday in 1943, of course (King was only 14) but if there had been, that taxpayer would have earned enough by that date in mid-January to pay his federal taxes for the entire year.

Compare that to today. According to the Tax Foundation, in 2008 the average American will work 74 days to pay federal taxes.

“We’re not being taxed, we’re being bled,” my friend points out. If he was paying taxes at 1943 rates, “I’d have saved an extra $15,000 a year for the last 6 years alone, and I’d be living in a house of my own and driving a nice new car.” But that’s not how it is. “Instead, I rent a very humble place, and drive a 14 year old minivan with 240,000 miles on it, trying to save enough to scrape up a down payment on something new.” Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Rich Tucker is an editor in Washington D.C. and a columnist for Townhall.com.

Be the first to read Rich Tucker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.< Sign up today!

witholding
Eliminate the entire income tax while you're at it.

Brilliant. Do you get paid to write this garbage - maybe by the RNC.

Thanks for wasting my time.

Flat tax
The Flash says: "The tax would would be rewritten to state: All income is taxable at X percent."

Therein lies the problem. It allows the government to define 'income' and what you get is 140,000 pages of governmentese which do so. Each page of which was generated in response to the lobbying of an interest group (or in many, many cases a specific individual) for tax breaks for themselves and their friends. In exchange for the 'tax break' correcting the unfairness of it all to the abused group, the group will be happy to contribute handsomely to the sponsors of the bill, in cash or in kind.

THAT'S why you don't want ANY 'income' tax, flat or otherwise.

Bob


Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.