Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS      
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Monday, February 04, 2008
China Trade: Patents, Poisons, and Prescription Drugs
By Phyllis Schlafly
Poll
Will Hillary Clinton fight for the nomination past June 1st?


At the MSNBC Florida presidential debate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney posed a very significant question. "As we compete with China, how do we make sure that trade is done in a way that levels the playing field? How do we ... protect American industry and American jobs, and do not cause a departure of jobs from this country?"

Good question, but neither Romney nor anyone else answered it.

Answering a question about the bipartisan stimulus package to give cash to every American, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee made an important point: "We'll probably end up borrowing this $150 billion from the Chinese. And when we get those rebate checks, most people are going to go out and buy stuff that's been imported from China. I have to wonder whose economy is going to be stimulated the most by the package." Again, nobody responded, and we didn't hear any plans on how to deal with the China problem.

How can we have fair trade with a country that is a major thief of our intellectual property? The Chinese don't even believe in individual intellectual property rights, which they look upon as a Western concept.

China is now salivating about the prospect that the Democratic Congress might make it easier to steal our patents. In the Nov. 7 issue of China Intellectual Property News, a Chinese spokesman says the patent bill soon to be voted on by the U.S. Senate is good news for China because the bill is "friendlier to the infringers than to the patentees in general as it will make the patent less reliable, easier to be challenged and cheaper to be infringed."

That's bad news for U.S. independent inventors and small companies. The author of that statement, Yongshun Cheng, is deputy director of the Intellectual Property Division of the Beijing High People's Court.

China is the world's biggest supplier of counterfeit, misbranded, substandard and unapproved pharmaceutical products to the United States. A dozen Chinese companies were producing Viagra until Pfizer finally won its patent protection lawsuit.

Poisons in Chinese products might not be limited to pet food, seafood, clothing and toys. Let's consider potential dangers from prescription drugs.

China has picked biotech as the new engine to continue its economic phenomenon. The Chinese government is supporting biopharmaceutical enterprises politically and financially, helping the biopharmaceutical industry to grow by 31.2 percent annually from 2001 to 2005.

China is marketing itself as an international outsourcing hub for life sciences and has become the largest vaccine manufacturing country in the world, capable of producing 41 vaccines. China already has more than 400 biopharmaceutical companies of different ownerships and more than 20,000 biotech research scientists. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Phyllis Schlafly is a national leader of the pro-family movement, a nationally syndicated columnist and author of Feminist Fantasies.

Be the first to read Phyllis Schlafly's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

China
Yes. China has in the past had a poor record of IPR protextion, but that was the case with many other of US trade partners in the past such as Taiwan. China's IPR has gotten better over the last few years with more crackdowns and more prosecutions. As China's economy gets more and more developed, so will its IPR enforcement--as was the case with Taiwan--since China will have a greater stake in IPR protection as they will have more and more IPR of their own to protect.

China has a problem with its quality control and since places like the US are some of China's largrest markets--lead in paint and date rape drugs on beads and rat poison in pet food doesn't do them any favors--China is not interested in poisoning you, they are interested in making a buck (or a yuan in this case).

People cut corners, some people are corrupt, as a developing country that is still mostly poor, consumer protection and product safety is still in its infancy as was the case with the US when its was in its huge economic growth spurt at the start of the 1900s. Why do you think the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 was passed?

As for losing workers to China...is it really in the best interest of the American consumer to pay more for his clothes just so a few textile jobs can be saved..and what about the extra dollars spent on the clothes that could have been put to better use--such as investing or buying other products or services that were produced in the US? Can Romney spell the word pandering?

"Only Nixon could go to China"
VOTE FOR FRED

Fred Thompson has withdrawn from the race for president. Fred Thompson is still our choice. Fred Thompson, a young attorney working for the justice department, hand picked by Ronald Reagan, helped defend some of our choices to vote for “the Republican,” Richard Nixon. Fred Thompson, as a senior Republican diplomat, left us with a coherent interpretation of our conservative views. Fred Thompson gave us a conservative focus that allowed us to find a new interpretation of ourselves as Republicans. Fred crafted thoughts and opinions into simple effective coherent statements and published those, point by point on his website as a primer to assist in finding our way as a nation. Fred has set an example and laid the groundwork for the next generation Conservative.

Vote your principles, GIVE FRED DELAGATES IN THE CONVENTION, no need to waste the signs, keep them up as a symbol of principal. We now have a responsibility to choose again, as for me, I’m going to vote for Fred if his name is on the ballot.

Sticking to our guns and strength and standing by Fred now costs one vote. The campaign for the White House was about us, not Fred. The campaign for the White House was about who we chose to lead, not the available choices. Give Fred the delegates in the convention to symbolize our conviction to our principles, not for Fred, for us.

The right to choose cost some of our fellow citizens, countrymen and family the ultimate price. Our price for our right to choose based on our principles is one vote.

VOTE FOR FRED…

Dennis McIntire, “The Constituent”
http://www.dennisforlife.com

Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.
John Quincy Adams