Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Paul Greenberg :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Lost Art of the Apology
by Paul Greenberg
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


Barack Obama faces a test of character in this unending race for the Democratic presidential nomination: Does he continue to take the high road, saying he aims to unite rather than divide the country, or does he respond in kind when his opponent throws every low thing she can at him?

It's not a test Hillary Clinton is likely to face. By now surely no one doubts her ability to plumb the political depths. A veteran of many a political campaign, hers is not the politics of unity but of the war room. To sum up her guiding philosophy: Attack, attack, attack. And one more thing - take no prisoners. She's not about to apologize for some of the stunts her campaign has pulled in this campaign, whether it's distributing a picture of her opponent in Somali dress, accusing him of plagiarism, or hubby's trying to dismiss Barack Obama as just another black candidate a la Jesse Jackson.

All those tactics backfired, which is the good news. The bad news is that, on the basis of such tactics, her fans continue to praise Clinton femme as a "fighter," even if it's a dirty fighter. For Americans in the Vince Lombardi tradition, it's not how you play the game but whether you win or lose. And of late - see Texas and Ohio - Miss Hillary has had some big wins. And winning means never having to apologize.

It's all in accord with the macho American tradition. "Never apologize," said John Wayne, perhaps the macho American hero. "It's a sign of weakness." Or to quote the title of Jim Belushi's book back in 2006, Real Men Don't Apologize.

To some of us, making a proper apology when we've wronged another, or just screwed up, is a sign of strength, not weakness. It demonstrates an ability to overcome false pride. One of the many lessons I learned - or was supposed to learn - in that graduate school of conduct called the U.S. Army is never, never try to weasel out of a mistake.

The best response when called on the carpet is a simple "No excuse, sir." Not "I'm sorry but . . ." or any other attempt to evade responsibility. An honest confession of fault clears the air and doesn't let the wrong fester. It's an effective course in civilian life, too. And, more important, an honorable one.

When one of Barack Obama's close advisers, Samantha Power, described Hillary Clinton as a monster who'd stoop to anything to win this election, Ms. Power was obliged to resign her post. Fair enough. Accountable enough. A resignation remains the most sincere from of apology in public life. And there aren't nearly enough of them.

Note the contrast with Hillary Clinton's reaction when her flack-in-chief, Howard Wolfson, compared Barack Obama to the Clintonistas' idea of a monster - Kenneth Starr, the prosecutor who pursued Bill Clinton in the late unpleasantness known as L'affaire Lewinsky. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
religiouslib - Part 8


religiouslib writes: “not only is that extreme vindictiveness(not really a Christian attribute) but really quite creepy.”


That’s another dishonest attempt to change the focus from yourself onto me, and I accept it gladly, long enough to show that I am operating in good faith and then shine the light of truth right back where it belongs.


1. There is nothing at all “vindictive” about exposing dishonesty and lies.


2. There is nothing “vindictive” about shining the light of truth on a habitually dishonest troublemaker, and adjusting the spotlight to keep him in the center as he moves around for the comfort of the shadows he’s accustomed to.


3. You can leave if you like, or you can come clean and be welcome to stay, but what you cannot do is remain dishonest and stay and not have me shine the light of truth on you. Get used to it, or change, or leave. The choice is entirely yours.


4. There is nothing “vindictive” or un-Christian about exposing wolves in sheep’s clothing, and you know it, RL.


"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. [16] Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?" (Matthew 7:15-16, KJV)



~~~



religiouslib writes: “i respectfully ask you to never respond to my posts again and i will do the same.”


I have just as much right to post here as you do, and if I see you posting lies and being dishonest, I’m going to call you on it, no different than if someone was doing something disrespectful or illegal out in front of my house. It’s the only way to keep the neighborhood decent.


And you always have the opportunity to defend your words, if you think you can.


And we can do this as long as it takes.


religiouslib - Part 7


religiouslib writes: “scott - so now you are stalking me on other threads.”


No, but that’s another attempt to remove the focus from yourself and to put me on the defensive. Knock yourself out, I’ll answer every charge, and then I’ll shine the light right back where it belongs.


You quoted ModMark without attribution earlier (3/15, 12:24pm) to lend support to your credibility and, once having done so, then attack me from what you intended to be an elevated perch.


But, as with everything you do, it was dishonest and you did it dishonestly.


An honest man doesn’t need to bring words of praise from another man in another Thread into the debate, and an honest man wouldn’t use them to elevate himself in preparation to launch an attack on someone else.


And an honest man wouldn’t post a quote without context, or without the name of the man who said those words.


You can spin and make excuses till the cows come home, but it won’t change anything RL. You may say you didn’t want to bring ModMark into the discussion, or that you didn’t know if he would want his name associated with our discussion in a Thread he was not participating in, or any other number of excuses.


None of that matters RL, it was poor judgment. The right thing to do is to let your own words speak for yourself, and if you need to bring in someone else’s words to shore up your credibility then you attribute those words to the man who spoke them, and if you’re not sure he wants to be mentioned, then you ask, or you don’t use them.


See, it’s not hard RL, not if you try and if your heart and your motives are honest.


If you were a kid, I’d cut you some slack here, but you’re old enough to know better.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.