Mike Adams
Texas Gay&M University

SHARE THIS:
Share

Some time ago, I recommended Texas A&M University as a good place to get an education. Now that it has added a course in the English Department called “Gay and Lesbian Literature” I need to reconsider. Generally, when a school dedicates entire courses to homosexuality its days are numbered as a university to be taken seriously.

Dr. Krista May now offers a course that “surveys the historical and social constructions of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender identities, primarily as they are expressed in the literature of British and American writers.”

That sounds innocent enough. But why spend a semester studying such a narrow aspect of literary works of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries? The syllabus continues: “The course also investigates earlier literary periods in order to contextualize relatively recent notions of sexual identity by situating them within cultural and historical frameworks.”

Interesting, isn’t it? The issues covered in the class include “literary expressions of homo-social behaviors in ancient Greece and Rome; development of homosexual subcultures in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; construction of female ‘romantic friendship’; the influence of late nineteenth-century sexologists and of Freud; intersections of racial, class, and sexual identities; and postmodern interrogations of identity.”

The stated purpose of the course is to provide students with “a starting point for understanding historical concepts that inform contemporary notions of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender identities …” This is done in order to challenge students to “think critically about strategies deployed in literary expressions of sexual identity.”

There is so much more to the reading in “Gay and Lesbian Literature” than the obvious Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde. Students also get to read The Columbia Anthology of Gay Literature as well as The Testosterone Files: My Hormonal and Social Transformation from Female to Male. Now that’s intellectual progress! Who said the Aggies were a bunch of backward hicks?

Going Rogue by Sarah Palin FREE
Mike Adams's Biography
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Mike Adams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Join the Debate
519 Comments So Far
« Previous12345678910Next »
Joycey Wrote: Feb 13, 2010 11:35 PM
Why shouldn't the phobic-of-the-so-called-homophobes be forced to tolerate those that are intolerant of wrong doings.
afriKa Wrote: Feb 12, 2010 4:28 PM
How novel: suggesting to the conservative know-it-nones here that they actually READ something written by ACTUAL experts who make their life in Science.

But, don'tya know? Science is just one HUGE LIBERAL PLOT to convince God-loving people that they should slow down their persecutions, purges, and attempts to roll back the calendar. The sooner you see these "scientists" for what they are -- polemical, Jesus-hating, Communist, sicko homosexuals hellbent on DESTROYING AMERICA -- the better off we'll all be. And stop with all these FACTS, which as we all know were put here by Satan.

I'm glad we have this all sorted out. If you want more 'facts' and 'logic' along these lines, just ask Anderson659 or annplato, respectively.

afriKa
Nichola Wrote: Feb 12, 2010 1:30 PM
If you want me to respect you, you'll have to respect me.

And yes, "intolerance won't be tolerated" means you can't be the homophobic pric that you are. Get over yourself.
anderson659 Wrote: Feb 12, 2010 3:05 AM
Again,

Claming to know what animals think and how they behave.

Stevie Mellor is still upset the San Francisco "gay" penguin flew straight.

Why the obsession with animal homosexuality Mellor? Have you explored the same advice you gave annplato?

And thak you for validating it was you who created my impostor handle on the other threads.

Thank you Stevie J. Mellor, computer expert and man of many handles.
annplato Wrote: Feb 12, 2010 2:14 AM
You pollute TH with such provocative articles and you DO seem to have an obsession with the gay agenda of the liberals.

The rest of us, are not that interested. There is some truth to the fact that it is none of our business what they to do to each other, even if it is stomach churning.

Apparently they have convinced many idiots, even some who seemingly served in the military that their marriage issue is something that should be taken seriously. I don’t take it so, and at this point in time not many people do, that is why it is voted down as often as it is brought onto ballot voting.

Semper libertas, you are entitled to your opinion, however if what you claim would be true, it already would have earned their coveted victory.
While race is an unchangeable condition, homosexuality is strictly a chosen life-style and not warranted to be equated with interracial marriage issues.

And that animal kingdom homosexuality is ridiculous: Are we now like animals that know no better? Should we next grant marriages between animals or perhaps men and their pets?

If that is the best argument they can come up with just shows how lowly they think of themselves, and just proves that their aggression for right to marry is entirely based on their inability to accept themselves as weird and abnormal. They wrongly think that right to marry will heal their self-esteem problems. They ought to seek psychological help, rather than marriage licenses.
David Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 8:51 PM

You think that gays brought on the AIDS epidemic? They didn't, although they are its main victims outside of Subsaharan Africa, where the epidemic began. There, it's an equal-opportunity disease.

And you think animals aren't gay? Read "Evolution’s Rainbow," in which author and evolutionary biologist Joan Roughgarden explores the range of diversity in sexuality, including homosexuality, within the animal kingdom.

Or look up a Department of Agriculture sheep experiment in Idaho, which showed that 8.5 percent of the rams studied were nonsexual toward ewes, but were sexually responsive to other rams. The Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine went even further and found biological differences that accounted for the rams’ homosexuality.

Or google Dr. Richard Pillard, a psychiatrist at Boston University School of Medicine. He pointed out that homosexuality exists "in virtually every animal species that has been exhaustively studied."

Oh, and about that smoking. Now that there are effective treatments for AIDS, it's probably more survivable than diseases like lung cancer and emphysema.
afriKa Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 5:57 PM
"Afreaka wonders how I know so much about May's course and similar homosexual propaganda courses. Well, Afreaka, I will satisfy your curisity."

I didn't post that. I asked the guy who did, twice, to cut it out.

For the record, your post didn't arouse my "curisity".

afriKa
afriKa Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 5:55 PM
"For what it is worth, I don't think afriKa is Stevie Mellor. Mellor is a computer guy. AfriKa teaches statistics. He was easy to identify, assuming he told the truth about himself."

I'm not Mellor. Anderson659 is fond of saying that Mellor and me and others are all the same person. I do teach stats, yes. And Mellor is a computer guy. Mellor is easily findable at his web site.


"He is paranoid about his name becoming known."

Paranoid? Hardly. Like 99% of the people here, I choose to keep my private life my own business.

afrika
Gruyere Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 3:15 PM
Afreaka wonders how I know so much about May's course and similar homosexual propaganda courses. Well, Afreaka, I will satisfy your curisity. I once impersonated an ugly lesbian and managed to infiltrate such a course. It was not a difficult task since I generally do not shave my legs or armpits, and have a short haircut. I am also pretty large and can appear menacing. The wealth of information I gained cannot be expressed with words. The only drawback I recall was an overwhelming nausea, which stayed with me until the course ended.
Gruyere Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 1:08 PM
In addition to being a social get-together of ugly lesbians and a couple of pretty fairies, May's Homosexual Propaganda Course serves as a group therapy session. It makes these knowledge-hungry students feel better about themseleves and gives them a great opportunity to meet other perverts in an "academic" setting. It also serves as an "outing" place, particularly for budding fairies, who use the course to find another sodomite to be his "partner" for the next three days.


jg Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 11:57 AM
For what it is worth, I don't think afriKa is Stevie Mellor. Mellor is a computer guy.

AfriKa teaches statistics. He was easy to identify, assuming he told the truth about himself.

He is paranoid about his name becoming known.

Same pod, different peas.
Michael Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 11:44 AM
"The purpose of government is not to enforce a personal moral code, but rather to protect individual liberty and property."

Government protects mainly through the enacting and enforcing of laws, which are based on personal or at least collective moral standards. The people or their representatives enact laws reflecting their beliefs about right and wrong.

"Thus, it is both immoral and illegal for you to steal your neighbor's car, but it is not illegal to covet his wife."

Coveting is a thought crime, which are as yet impossible to prove and therefore cannot be outlawed. Adultery, however, is still illegal in many states, so if thought crosses over into behavior, the behavior can be punished.

"Nowhere in the Bible is homosexual sex condemned without also condemning sexual immorality in general."

That only shows that, by bibilical standards, homosexuality is a specific kind of sexual immorality and falls under the same umbrella as incest, bestiality, adultery, etc.

"Do you also believe that all those who engage in sex outside of wedlock deserve to contract a terminal illness?"

I believe all who engage in sex outside of marriage reap what they sow.

"I don't understand the special emphasis so many of you put on gay sex (and specifically gay sex between men -- you don't seem to mind so much about women)."

Same-sex marriage opponents are opposed to lesbian marriage as much as male-male marriage. As regards visceral disgust at gay sex vs. lesbian sex, it's true that heterosexuals -- men and women alike -- are grossed out by gay sex to a greater degree than lesbian sex. I can't speak for why women feel this way, but for men, I think the disgust over two women copulating is mitigated by the gender of the actors. (Also, most scenes of copulation between women are performances for men's entertainment -- i.e, "they don't really mean it" -- which mitigates the disgust.)
afriKa Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 11:05 AM
I told you to CUT IT OUT.

I'm sending a note to the TownHall people. STOP SIGNING YOUR STUPID POSTS WITH MY NAME. You're really a loser.

afriKa
Anderson569 Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 11:03 AM
"Courses like that, intentended to glorify and whitewash homosexuality, are generally taught by ugly lesbians for ugly lesbians or lesbians in the making. A few fairies occassionally grace the class, but they are definitely the minority."

What a remarkably cogent and accurate portrayal of such courses! You must have taken MANY to be so with-it.

"Ugliness" is in the eye of the beholder. You keep taking courses -- or, I'm betting, not -- taught by pretty people who cater to your prejudices, and the rest of us can get on with the prospect of at least attempting to listen to what people with other experiences and opinions have to say,

afriKa
afriKa Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 11:01 AM
Rationalism is somehow bad? What's your alternative? Supernaturalism? Random traditions? Whatever some book tells you?

afriKa
michael Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 8:57 AM
More rationalism, yet weak. Grabbing at straws.
Gruyere Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 8:19 AM
My advice -- take May's Homosexual Propaganda course and become a lesbian. It beats shaving armpits and losing a few pounds.

Courses like that, intentended to glorify and whitewash homosexuality, are generally taught by ugly lesbians for ugly lesbians or lesbians in the making. A few fairies occassionally grace the class, but they are definitely the minority.

Overall, a complete waste of money. It would be cheaper to get those unfortunate creatures gym memeberships and some makeup.

Certainly, schools receive grants earmarked "homosexual indoctrination" and are compelled to set up gender/homosexual studies. A great majority of students and faculty laugh that off, nevertheless, it makes a school look bad. Corrupted, compromised and not very serious academically.

How about a mulitimillion dollar grant to Yale earmarked "the misunderstood cocaine and how it helped me make a fortune"? Any ideas for a course?
afriKa Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 1:52 AM
But isn't it "atto"? But that's much "ato" about nuthin'...

What surprises me about Anderson is that he is SUCH a bad adjudicator of sources, and expects others not to notice. He is fond of posting all sorts of numbers from studies run by rabidly conservative polemic factories. As if they used unbiased, random samples. The guy who does the studies "proving" gays die 20+ years earlier did it by reading obituaries. Talk about a convenience sample! And at the height of the AIDS epidemic. He cannot even PRETEND to be serious.

And then there's the doofus who claims unwed mothers "cannot love". What IS it with these people? At least Sarah Palin has a built-in voter base...


afriKa
Semper Libertas Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 1:51 AM
quote: "The concept that you'd stand up, on principle, for someone outside your interest group..."

To paraphrase Jefferson, when the liberty and property of one person is infringed upon, the liberties of all of us are infringed upon. Any government that can arbitrarily one day decide that gays should be less than equal before the law, can certainly decide another day the same about people who are redheaded, left-handed, or anything else.

Unfortunately, using the government to enforce a personal agenda (and thus to intrude on the liberties of another) is a characteristic of both "liberals" AND "conservatives". Only the shopping list is different.
Semper Libertas Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 1:46 AM
Weren't all of us once children? Apparently, all straight men have sex with women that were once children. Yikes!
Anderson569 Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 12:47 AM
Ooh: you're gonna report me. I'm quaking!

You're just as easy to mimic as Anderson, with your academic pretensions. But not as much fun.
afriKa Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 12:43 AM
"First of all, I'm not sure what you mean by "you homosexuals", since I'm straight."

You're likely wasting your breath. In Anderson's nano-sized conceptual universe, anyone putting forth an empirically-sound, well-reasoned argument that might be construed as suggesting that gay people aren't vile and hellbent on destroying the earth MUST be gay themselves. The concept that you'd stand up, on principle, for someone outside your interest group is utterly foreign to him.

He has called me and Jeffrey gay many times, despite being told over and over that we are not. And not just gay, but epithets like "radical homosexual activists". Apparently, saying things like "not all straight people reflexively believe the state should accord gay people fewer rights" turns you automatically gay.

A true crank. And full of knowing lies.

afriKa
Semper Libertas Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 12:31 AM
First of all, I'm not sure what you mean by "you homosexuals", since I'm straight.

But yes, I do in fact know that Loving v. VA was about race, not sexual orientation. And, yes, I have read the opinion. I also know that in a common law system such as our own, law is built in part on precedent. And, of course in Loving the Court was presuming marriage between a man and a woman -- that was the only marriage being recognized anywhere at the time, and was the only marriage relevant to the case.

I don't think I'm misconstruing -- or taking out of context the following from that opinion:

"The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.

"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discriminations. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State. "

Yes, it mentions race, but it is incredibly dense to suggest that the same principle isn't at least debatable concerning same-sex marriage.

The bottom line is this: the purpose of government is to protect liberty and property. Same-sex marriage intrudes on neither your liberty or your property, so it really is none of your business (or mine).
afriKa Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 12:31 AM
CUT IT OUT.

Your original post lampooning Anderson659 was funny, but do not pretend to be me. I'll report you to Townhall.com if you do this again. If you have something to say, say it under your own handle.

afriKa
Anderson569 Wrote: Feb 11, 2010 12:22 AM
Ohmygosh: thanks for re-posting that bit by Anderson... but I don't think it's him. I mean, the part about flossing and "were once children". It's really too silly even for what's-his-name. A parody, it has to be. And a pretty darned good one.

Has he already accused you of lying about who you are, your credentials, you post under multiple handles, you're this, you're that? If not, I suspect he will. It's all par for the course.

I did see that Jeffrey wrote a clear, well-reasoned post to him, AS IF THAT WILL HAVE ANY EFFECT. He may as well argue Kantian metaphysics with an aphid.

afriKa
« Previous12345678910Next »