Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, March 07, 2008
Merrill Matthews :: Townhall.com Columnist
Protect Inventors from Patent Pirates
by Merrill Matthews
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


And what constitutes an indicator of "intent to deceive" varies from court to court — sometimes from judge to judge.

That vagueness is being exploited by generic drug manufacturers. Every so often, they hit a jackpot when a judge with an especially broad definition of "relevant material" decides to invalidate a patent.

The result is an epidemic of frivolous inequitable-conduct claims. In the words of one federal circuit court judge, "the habit of charging inequitable conduct in almost every major patent case has become an absolute plague."

That drives up the cost of patent litigation, wastes the scarce resources of government regulators, clogs up the courts, and destroys the incentive for people to invent new cures.

Jon Dudas, director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which oversees all patent applications, says that "inequitable conduct allegations are frequently made but not often found, and thus add substantially to litigation cost and duration."

Much like ambulance-chasing lawyers, patent-challengers don't need to win every lawsuit. If they win just one inequitable-conduct ruling, the original patent holder loses the right to exclusively sell a drug. And most drugs cost about $1 billion to develop these days.

Generic manufacturers can take the drug's billion-dollar formula, produce copycat pills on the cheap, flood the market, and siphon away a hefty chunk of the profits.

Even if an inventor is found innocent of an inequitable-conduct charge, the arbitration process itself is expensive and time-consuming.

Obviously, we should expect full disclosure from anyone trying to patent a product. But the patent-approval process is breathtakingly complex — an honest mistake shouldn't spell disaster. And the people filing frivolous charges need to be held accountable.

With Congress currently debating how to update our patents laws, policymakers should consider reforming the rules governing inequitable conduct. There would still be no guarantee that the ultimate cure for hangovers would be invented in your neighbor's garage, but stranger things have happened.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Merrill Matthews, Ph.D., is a resident scholar with the Institute for Policy Innovation.

Good job, GunnyG
I thought their was something oddly familiar about these various jerks - and the background exaggerations that just didn't fit the lameness of their comments seemed to be a common denominator. Maybe Hal's lilly as well...

It's like the hydra of Greek mythology.
________________________________________________

Phyllis Schlafly has already written of the latest attempts to gut the patent process with the 'first to file' legal scam. Rather than apply the correct remedy to the US patent process, which would be to fund it at the level it deserves, given its constitutionally mandated importance and the complexity of the process, its funding is treated the way the left treats another constitutionally mandated authority, i.e. military funding.

If need be, provide it with the funding and staff it requires, at the expense of non-mandated, wasteful and extraneous agencies such as education, energy, commerce, etc that are little more than homes for liberal lawyers and others who can't make it in the real world.

The Lawyers are the Problem
Once again, here is a huge debate over an important part of our country that is being ruined by ambulance chasers. The answer is loser pays. If the cost of the endless failed lawsuits against patent holders (or doctors, or drug companies, or insurance companies, or people that build playgrounds or shovel the snow from their sidewalks, etc.) were put fully upon the lawyers who are knowingly using this tactic as extortion and/or a lottery, this would stop. We could then discuss the real problems with the patent system (healthcare system, drug development, lack of playgrounds, absurd warning labels on coffee, etc) if there really are any. But, once again, we're talking about major changes to the patent system here rather than a simple change to the tort system.

"... of the lawyers, by the lawyers, and for the lawyers..."
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.