Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, April 01, 2009
Maggie Gallagher :: Townhall.com Columnist
Should NY Discriminate Against Sex Abuse Victims?
by Maggie Gallagher
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Michael O'Herlihy used to be a Catholic priest.

He was accused of abusing one of his students around 1980, at a time when he taught at Cardinal Hayes High School in the Bronx. In 1993 he was defrocked. In 2002 his name was included on a list of priests accused of sexual abuse that the Archdiocese of New York gave to Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau.

And, yet, where is Michael O'Herlihy today?

He is an assistant principal at a public high school -- Manhattan Comprehensive Night and Day High School.

Should public school teachers receive special protection from sex abuse charges?

A new bill pushed in New York (similar legislation has been introduced in other states) has two remarkable features: 1) It removes the statute of limitations for civil lawsuits against sex abusers at schools and charities for one year, and 2) it exempts public schools.

Removing the statute of limitations means that people who believe they were victimized as children can reach back 30 years or 40 years or more and sue not only individuals (likely dead or poor), but the institutions that hired these individuals. A flood of new litigation based on ancient cases, by victims who never came forward before, will make it difficult to defend against false claims (or honest claims by disturbed people) because so many of the people involved are dead.

Sex abuse of children is a horrifying crime. So is punishing people for crimes that did not occur. We have a statute of limitations for a reason. Even rape victims are not typically allowed to come forward 30 or 40 or 50 years later because determining justice after so much time has passed is too hard.

I don't mind crucifying the abusers, whatever their religion. But in this case permitting lawyers to collect vast sums from nonprofits is not going to punish the abusers. It's going to punish, even potentially shut down, students, teachers and parents at religious schools and other faith communities who never did anything wrong. Schools and churches are not businesses. Their expenses are paid by people using them now. The people who will pay for this flood of litigation are mostly those who had no control over what happened 30 years ago.

Sex abuse survivors say that justice requires taking this drastic step and running this risk. And I'm willing to entertain that idea because sex abuse of children is appalling.

But if justice requires this drastic step, we need justice for all victims, not just victims who happen to have been abused by nonprofits. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Maggie Gallagher is a nationally syndicated columnist, a leading voice in the new marriage movement and co-author of The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially.

Be the first to read Maggie Gallagher's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Where's
Maggie, that last line is somewhat disturbing. How is it "political payback" for allowing victims more opportunities to go after these criminals? It appears as though you want to protect certain people merely because of their religious affiliation.

It is OBVIOUS that NY is trying to protect its failed public schools, but two wrongs don't make a right. I cheer the decision, even in its limited form, while questioning the protection of public school employees.

Your last line makes it appear as though you believe that a victim who comes forward only does so for political reasons. May I be frank? I think that is horrendous and I believe you owe an apology to those victims. NY's motives aside... where is the satisfaction that at least some victims may now have their day in court?

You have the obligatory lines in there about crucifying the perps, etc., but you then drop in lines in reagrd to these wicked people such as "likely dead or poor" as though that matters.

You say you don't care about religious affiliation, but it seems obvious that you do. To argue in one sentence that it is almost unthinkable to bring forward 30-year-old charges against institutions that had no control over the events and then turn around and argue that if you're going to do that you have to do it to everyone is quite silly. It reveals an agenda on your part.

You should either be arguing that ALL these lawsuits are ridiculous or that ALL are legitimate, public or private. To essentially argue that "NONE is worthy of the court's time, but if we're going to waste time, we should waste everyone's time" exposes your true concern.

Maggie Gallagher's Article on Abuse
The New York Law that discriminates against the victims of sexual abuse by public school teachers is clearly unconstitutional as it violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Furthermore, sexual abuse by public school teachers is more prevelant than sex abuse by Priests, according to Government Statistics.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.