Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login | What's Hot
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Ken Connor :: Townhall.com Columnist
Obama Vetoes Religion in the Public Square
by Ken Connor
Forward Print Share Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?




The relationship between religion and politics has become murky in recent years.  The effort of America's Founders to prevent the establishment of a state religion has been twisted and reinterpreted to create an increasingly large gulf between religion and public life.  That gulf became even wider this past week, when President Obama's administration asked Georgetown University to remove all signs and symbols from their hall before the President delivered his speech to the assembly.  The University was only too willing to strip the hall of its religious symbols in order to land such a prominent speaker.  The message was clear: religion has no place in the public square.

This is not the first time Mr. Obama has shown signs of his low view of religion in the public square.  In a 2007 speech, he criticized many evangelicals involved in politics, saying, "Somehow, somewhere along the way, faith stopped being used to bring us together and started being used to drive us apart.  It got hijacked.  Part of it's because of the so-called leaders of the Christian Right, who've been all too eager to exploit what divides us."  Mr. Obama seems to believe any religious opinions that can be construed as divisive have no place in politics.  The natural conclusion is that religion's only place in the public square is to function as a kind of feel-good, unifying placebo.  No one should make public arguments rooted in religious truth.

Obama continued on his multi-cultural embrace, explaining, "Whatever we once were, we're no longer a Christian nation.  At least not just.  We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, and a Buddhist nation, and a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers."  A diversity of religious beliefs has always existed in America, so what point is the President making here?  In the context of his previous quote, he seems to have trouble with any religious viewpoint that makes actual truth claims.  This kind of all-inclusive religiosity is based upon a form of relativism directly at odds with the fundamental tenets of many faiths.  Apparently, Mr. Obama believes that if you want to present your religious views in the public square, you must remove all statements that contradict or criticize any other religion or belief.

It's not surprising that a man who believes that the firm opinions of religious people have no place in the public square would seek to hide religious signs and symbols during his speech at Georgetown University.  Among other changes, Georgetown officials covered the monogram "IHS" (an early Christian monogram of Jesus Christ's name) that was on the wall behind President Obama as he gave his address.  If the President already agreed to speak at Georgetown University—a Catholic University—why did he feel the need to strip the University of all vestiges of its Christian heritage?  The University's associate vice president for communications Julie Green Bataille tried to argue that "it seemed most respectful to have [the symbols] covered so as not to be seen out of context."  But Ms. Bataille neglected to mention former First Lady Laura Bush's previous appearance at Georgetown, where she spoke in front of the very same sign and did not cover it.  Surely the average viewer would realize that the murals and signs on Georgetown's walls were part of the college itself and not endorsed by the President.  The President appears to be going out of his way to strip even the slightest hint of religion from his political discourse.

Perhaps even more troubling is Georgetown University's ready complicity with the White House's request.  University officials were all too quick to remove the symbols of their religious founding when presented with the opportunity to net a famous speaker.  Georgetown is a Jesuit University founded in 1789, and yet its administrators were willing to hide the school's religious identity in order to land a popular guest.  Patrick Reilly, President of The Cardinal Newman Society, understands the situation well: "It is such a sad commentary that Catholic universities are willingly hiding the most visible signs of their Catholic identity when hosting secular leaders.  What's next, will Notre Dame cover images of Jesus and Mary and ban rosaries when they honor President Obama next month?"

Why are Georgetown's administrators willing to hide their faith?  Their tradition is clear on this point.  In Matthew 10:32-33, Jesus said, "Whoever acknowledges me before men, I will also acknowledge him before my Father in heaven.  But whoever disowns me before men, I will disown him before my Father in heaven."  Apparently the prestige of having the President speak was just too great a temptation for the University's officials.

Americans need to rethink their understanding of church and state.  The Founders sought to guard against the establishment of an official state religion.  They did not want the church to wield the sword of government.  But they did not seek to ban religious discussion from the public square.  In fact, they sought to guard religious speech and practice in the First Amendment to the Constitution.  They understood that removing religious speech from the political sphere discriminates against religion.  A public square stripped of religion is not somehow "more fair" for everyone—rather, it discriminates against the religious in favor of atheists and agnostics.  A person's religious beliefs inform who they are, the way they think, the truth they accept, and the very basis of their arguments.  To seek to remove religious speech from the public square is to establish secularism as the only acceptable mode of political discourse.

The President's efforts to remove all vestiges of Georgetown's religious roots during his speech is troubling.  Is our President so afraid of religion in politics that he will not allow even the name of Jesus to remain on the wall behind him when he speaks?  His previous comments and latest actions paint an increasingly clear picture of a man who believes strong religious belief has no place in public.  Perhaps he, like many others these days, believes that a man's religious beliefs should be left in his closet at home.  Such views do far greater harm to free political discourse than a sign on a wall.
Share:
Forward Print Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Ken Connor is Chairman of the Center for a Just Society in Washington, DC.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

Join The Debate!

Post Your Comment
(84 comments so Far)
View in ascending order     View in descending order
Reply # 1
Date: Apr 27, 2009 - 8:49 PM EST
Ivan-NY
I had elected to respond to Ur Initial post before seeing the last at 8:01PM..Anyway, based upon Ur initial offering I was gonna sau that I think Ur philosophy is not unlike mine, ie. I'm absolutely CERTAIN that I am ,morally, etc, at least as UPRIGHT as most Devout Christians.. I'm also too LAZY to attend Church with my Wife..I know a person who always chose to be "Noncommital" as to the Existence of GOD UNTIL HE WAITED IN THE CROTCH OF A TREE in a Monsoon waiting for *Jolly Green* to rescue his "ragged arse"!!JG showed up RITE ON TIME. NOW tHAT WILL GIVE CAUSE TO at least, RETHINK the matter!! I'd rethink Ur final "Quote"..CHEERS
Flag as Offensive

Reply # 2
Date: Apr 27, 2009 - 6:49 PM EST
false gods
Robert of MI wrote: "It is plain to see that Obama thinks he knows better than Jesus Christ. I think Georgetown University should have refused to take the symbols down or cover them. Are they going to bow before Jesus Christ or President Obama? Choose whom they are going to serve."
I'm afraid G-town sold out to the secular gods long ago. My only surprise is how LOW their asking price was!
Just remember, dear Jesuits, that "False gods ALWAYS fail us." ---Walter Wangerin
Flag as Offensive
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
 *
State:
 *
Zip:
 *
Phone:
       
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.