Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
John Stossel :: Townhall.com Columnist
What Happened to Market Discipline?
by John Stossel
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Irresponsibility induced by government-created perverse incentives is the culprit. For decades politicians of both parties have relieved big companies of the responsibility that market discipline would have imposed. The promise -- explicit or implicit -- to bail out companies "too big to fail" weakens market discipline. That invites recklessness.

What if the government cut Freddie, Fannie, Bear, AIG and the others loose and let them do what other businesses do on hard times: renegotiate with creditors and revalue assets? Would there be another Great Depression? Not likely. What turned a recession into the Great Depression was the Federal Reserve's contraction of the money supply. I doubt they'd make that mistake twice.

Public officials say the big companies must be saved to prevent a devastating credit "lock." Really? Without a federal bailout, lending wouldn't have resumed? The market wouldn't have sorted it out? Prices wouldn't have found a more solid floor? We'll never know.

We do know that the taxpayer will buy -- Probably for too much money, because the private sellers will fool the government managers -- at least $700 billion in "illiquid" assets. Where will this money come from: taxation, borrowing or the printing press? What will that do to our economic well-being?

Crisis is the friend of the State. The politicians are desperate to be seen as "showing leadership," so we're surely in for a new round of government interventions. Watch for the equivalent of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. There'll be much posturing about how the new regulations "will keep this from ever happening again," but that's more nonsense because the root problem is not lack of regulation. It's government social engineering of the housing market, which will be unchanged.

This is the path to stagnation and poverty. As Nobel Laureate F.A. Hayek taught, markets are too complicated for planners to know enough to plan them. The relevant information, scattered unspoken among billions of market participants, is beyond the bureaucrats' reach.

We do need protection from reckless businessmen. But there is only one way to provide that: market discipline. That means: no privileges, and no bailouts.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
John Stossel blogs at http://blogs.abcnews.com/johnstossel/ is an award-winning news correspondent and author of Myths, Lies, and Downright Stupidity: Get Out the Shovel--Why Everything You Know is Wrong.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read John Stossel's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
What happened to market discipline?
Mr. Stossel is right. This is a financial crisis arranged by the Government, as prepresented by Rep. Barney Frank (D, MA).

The Government removed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from market discipline with a guarantee, then told it what to do through its own, special regulator OFHEO and by legislation. Fan and Fred were staffed with government elite.

The center of the current financial disaster is a runaway government guarantee placed in service of Government affilliated corporations, under the direction of Barney Frank, and the cooperation of most of Congress. Any opposition came from some Republicans and the Bush administration.

How could two companies ruin the US and the worlds financial markets? With the power and credit to buy up 90% of all prime mortgages and 20% of all subprime. Fannie and Freddie together controlled $5.4 trillion of housing debt (that is $5,400 billion, or $5,400 thousand million). Compare that to the $5.5 trillion budget debt of the US.

Congress ran Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into the ground, plucking presents along the way. Congress set up Fannie and Freddie, () took full responsibility by effectively (but unofficially) guaranteeing repayment of its debts, () removed it from private market discipline, () funded it through massive private borrowing outside of Government budget accounts, () commanded it to do risky business outside usual standards, () restricted its regulation to a special office set up by Congress (OFHEO), and () then ignored that regulator.

Blaming Bush is misguided; blaming the free market is idiotic. Blame the corruption of Congress, mostly the Democrats.

(continued at http://easyopinions.blogspot.com/2008/10/we-guarantee-it.h tml)

Hagar
While I agree in principal with the sentiment of your Sep 24, 2008 - 10:44 AM post you leave out one major issue which must also be addressed.

Most of the banks who entered into these bad loans did so at the pressure of Federal State and Local governments which used their power to legitimize "community activism" by groups who claimed discrimination of the poor (or even racial discrimination because minorities are mostly poor) when lenders set a limit to who they would loan money to (known as red lining).

Groups like NACA and ACORN mobilized activists to disrupt daily business of banks and lenders who chose to lend money to only those who demonstrated the financial ability to pay it back over the time the loan was for. They found support in the liberal and socialist side of our political spectrum, who then enacted legislation (the Community Reinvestment Act is but one example) requiring banks and lenders to provide funding for low or no income loans if they wanted to expand their business into new markets or even continue doing business in the markets they already were in.

It got so bad that the financial institutions gave into the legalized extortion and started handing over funding to these groups allowing them to make the decision who would get the loans. To cover their interests the financial institutions would then sell the loans made with those funds to other financial institutions such as Fannie and Freddie.

Banks should take the actions that you mentioned, but government needs to repeal legislation such as the Community Reinvestment Act which mandated lenders to make loans they would otherwise not have made. The only way government will repeal such legislation is to remove from office those who enacted it and replace them with politicians who understand the problem well enough not to repeat the mistakes again.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.