Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Sunday, March 02, 2008
Janice Shaw Crouse :: Townhall.com Columnist
The U.N.’s Solution to Teem Pregnancy
by Janice Shaw Crouse
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who won Tuesday's presidential debate?


New York City — During the first week of the United Nations (U.N.) Commission on the Status of Women, the UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund) distributed a booklet, "Giving Girls Today & Tomorrow: Breaking the Cycle of Adolescent Pregnancy". The booklet begins by stating that adolescent girls hold the key to a world without poverty. Then the booklet asserts that the majority of adolescent girls who become pregnant are “married and pressured to have a child.” Others, they add, are pregnant from “abusive, forced or coerced sex.”

That’s it — adolescent pregnancy is a matter of the girls being married and pressured to have a child or pregnant from forced sex. Adolescent mothers face a grim future, according to UNFPA: poverty, ill health, HIV risk, frequent pregnancies and a dismal future. UNFPA declares that “pregnancy is the number one killer of adolescent girls.”

Buried on page three is the information that adolescent pregnancy is declining overall worldwide. Buried in the middle of a paragraph! Even so, the crisis tone continues. We learn that the pregnancy rate among 15-19-year-olds in developing countries is five times higher than in developed nations. And, the U.S. rate is double the average of other developed countries. These are obvious causes for concern, but throughout the booklet, there are statements indicating that the problem is declining. For instance, on page four, in the middle of a paragraph lamenting child marriage, is the statement that “child marriage is declining globally.” Then the bombshell: where child marriage is not the norm, pregnancy among unmarried adolescents occurs.

Obviously, there are very real concerns about adolescent marriage and adolescent childbearing, but lumping together 12-19-year-olds is mixing apples and oranges. There is a big difference between a married 12-year-old mother and a married 19-year-old mother. There is not such a big difference between an unmarried 12-year-old mother and an unmarried 19-year-old mother.

The UNFPA booklet certainly paints a realistic look at the health and economic problems of adolescent pregnancy and motherhood. It even points to poverty as the overwhelming “cause” of early marriage and early sexual activity.

The basic problem of the UNFPA booklet and the U.N. approach to adolescent sexuality is that pregnancy and motherhood are not problems. When a problem is wrongly identified, there is no way to find a solution. Calling pregnancy and motherhood problems exacerbates and complicates a crisis situation and prevents the identification of solutions.

The problem is lack of education and lack of opportunity. Without education and opportunity for a bright future, early sexual activity, early marriage and teen motherhood are inevitable.

Ironically, those who bemoan adolescent pregnancy and motherhood are the ones who fight abstinence and faithfulness programs. The lame plea, “give girls greater control over their reproductive rights,” falls flat. Promoting thin latex condoms hardly gives girls greater control. The lame advice, “promote gender equality to empower women,” is impractical. How can an adolescent girl be “empowered to resist sexual coercion”? The lame goal, “helping girls gain greater control over their sexual and reproductive lives,” is counterproductive. Much of the UNFPA booklet describes cultural mores that will not bend to a young girl’s control.

Many of the UNFPA recommendations are good: enforcing laws against child marriage, promoting education for girls, providing good health services before, during and after child birth, working with families and boys to promote respect for girls’ rights and zero tolerance for violence against girls and women

But besides the underlying anti-marriage and anti-motherhood messages, the booklet repeatedly stresses the importance of readily available access to contraception for adolescents as well as comprehensive sexual and reproductive health education. While adolescents need to know basic information, they do not need the type of sex education that comes out of the United Nations — advocating “safe sex” and values-free, non-judgmental attitudes about sexual behavior.

While there is plenty of advice and policies to promote delaying marriage and childbearing, there is no mention of delaying sexual activity. And, the word “abstinence” is not mentioned a single time in the whole booklet.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Janice Shaw Crouse is a former speechwriter for George H. W. Bush and now political commentator for the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Janice Shaw Crouse's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: The Wacked Out Christians' View of Sex
Robert E Lee: "The word "abstinence"...is not mentioned a single time in the whole booklet." This should be no surprize because its leftist authors cling to the left's notion the removal of all restrictions on sexual behavior will lead to utopia, namely, everyone can enjoy themselves without guilt and nothing bad or unpleasant will ever happen."

So, you are purporting that the ideal is for people to be ridden with guilt and have unpleasant and bad things happen to them as a result of having sex?

"Teem" pregnancy
It seems teen pregnancy is not as "teeming" as it was. It is in keeping with political correctness that the pregnancy of a teen is someone else's fault. No bad result could possibly be due to the actions of person suffering the bad result. It would have to be the parents who forced the teen to marry, or the fault of the busband who insisted that the teen wife get pregnant.
Neither of these situations fits with the case in the United States. Nurses who work with pregnant teens have told me that the girls sometimes get pregnant on purpose to escape from a bad home situation. I would strongly doubt that much of percentage of the pregnant were raped. If that is the case, then the girl is responsible for the pregnancy even though older men often try to take advantage of young girls.
I would not expect anything logical or helpful to come from the United Nations.
Donald W. Bales, M.D. retired, Kingsport, Tn.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.