Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, May 11, 2009
Herb London :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Unfolding Iranian Drama
by Herb London
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Decades of appeasement and accommodations with Iran have led to the present impasse. These policy blunders cannot be attributed to President Obama. In fact, blame belongs on both sides of the political aisle. However, what distinguishes Obama’s diplomatic initiative from others is the “downgrading” of Israel in order to strike a “grand bargain” with Iran for regional “pacification.” Whether Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu wants it or not, Jerusalem is now on a collision course with Washington.

Israelis may be understandably stunned by the evolution of events. They are on the horns of a dilemma. Netanyahu has responded to the emerging U.S. position by noting that he will be accommodative on any argument with the Palestinians if Obama can negate the Iranian threat. He is attempting to establish a nexus between a Palestinian accord and the elimination of this threat. After all, he contends, if Iran is in the position to build nuclear weapons, the weapons serve as a cover for Hamas missile attacks against the state of Israel since escalation could lead to a nuclear exchange and should be avoided at all cost.

The Obama administration position is 180 degrees in a different direction. It appears to be arguing that an accommodative Israel that makes a deal with the Palestinians for a separate state will have American protection against a possible Iranian nuclear attack. But the first and overarching responsibility lies with Israel to arrange its negotiated settlement with Palestinian leaders.

President Obama believes time is on his side since he has already conceded with his “engagement” drive that Iran will have the time to enrich enough uranium to build a nuclear weapon. Prime Minister Netanyahu, unable to accept the potential threat, feels time is of the essence. The closer Iran gets to the fateful “tipping point,” the closer Israel is to survival issues.

Erstwhile President Jimmy Carter tried to assuage Israeli leaders in 1979 by noting that his craven concession to Iranian leaders did not pose a threat to Israel. Is Barack Obama preparing to go one step further in downgrading the importance of Israel in his attenuated negotiation with Iran? History is waiting impatiently for an answer and the world waits with bated breath.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Herbert London is president of Hudson Institute and professor emeritus of New York University. He is the author of Decade of Denial (Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, 2001).

Be the first to read Herb London's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Hit 1st and Hit Hard
Quote: "Do you REALLY think that if we disarm, we will be left alone by our enemies? What happens to the child in the schoolyard that tries to avoid the bully? He is hunted down, and beaten worse. We must stand up to those that would take away our lives, and our liberties. We can only do so if we are prepared to back it up."

Exactly my point. As long as we hold onto Nukes we sit here and wait for the inevitable strike. If we de-Nuked we could assert ourselves and force these tird rate countries to give up their weapons (by coercion or force). Getting rid of the Nukes does not mean getting rid of our conventional or covert forces...to the contrary it would mean increasing their strength to combat all the budding nuclear powers. How powerful a message would we send the world if we disarmed our nuclear arsenal then bombed Irans nuclear ambitions into the stone age?

Quote: "In Special Forces, we like to sneak up on the enemy, and kill him on his own territory. If fight on the Islamics territory, we are winning. If we are fighting on our own territory, we are more than halfway to losing."

As a former Special Forces soldier (18D) I'm fairly familiar with the tactics. Sitting on you Nuclear Arsenal waiting for them to strike 1st (since we would never launch the 1st Nuke...right?) is a losing strategy. I say get rid of the Nukes and take the fight to them. Hit 1st and Hit Hard!


Anne......Joseph(IL)
Anne- people are winking at each other when they use the word christian attached to Obozo
are they not?

Joseph-- you are kidding when you say Israel is not important? What have you been drinking or eating? Been to a Dr. lately?

Why do I get ired when I see Jimmmmmmy Carter
and the word Iran mentioned together?
Elvis
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.