Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, August 18, 2008
Harry R. Jackson, Jr. :: Townhall.com Columnist
Faith, Science, and Public Policy
by Harry R. Jackson, Jr.
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



Is climate change a greater threat than freezing the jobless in the dark? This is a real question for both today’s priests and politicians. Energy policies that protect the poor should be the highest priority for both the clergy and lawmakers.

As our culture awakens to the changing dynamics of our environment, we cannot forget our history. In 1900, there were no airplanes or computers, and virtually no cars, telephones or electricity. Wood and coal heated drafty homes. Tuberculosis and other diseases killed millions. The average American life expectancy was only 47 years old.

Thanks to affordable energy and the indomitable American spirit, the average American now lives to age 78. He or she travels our nation and world at will, and lives better than royalty did a century ago. We’ve eradicated killer diseases and developed technologies even Jules Verne couldn’t imagine.

Abundant, reliable, affordable energy also transforms constitutionally protected rights into opportunities and rights we actually enjoy – including jobs, homes, food, transportation, healthcare and the pursuit of happiness. When access to energy is restricted, job creation and civil rights are hobbled.

Nearly 85% of US energy comes from fossil fuels – and we’re producing and using that energy more efficiently and with less pollution every year. Unfortunately, energy is no longer affordable.

Experts tell us that the United States has native supplies of oil, gas, coal, oil shale and uranium that would last us for centuries to come. But environmentalists and politicians have made most of these resources off-limits. Instead, we send foreign dictators trillions of dollars driving up food and energy prices and eliminating the jobs, lower prices, royalties and taxes that producing US energy would bring to our economy.

That’s not just insane. It’s an immoral war on the poor.

It will take years to find and develop deposits, especially if environmentalists keep filing lawsuits. But if we end leasing and drilling bans, speculators would instantly start selling oil contracts and prices would drop. If we don’t end the bans, we won’t have still won’t have sufficient energy in yet another decade, prices will be even higher, and more families will suffer.

“Alternatives” like wind and solar energy will also take decades to grow from their current status (1% of our energy sources) to meeting a greater portion of our needs. The same is true of flex-fuel vehicles.

To some radical environmentalists, these facts are “irrelevant.” These extremists simply want to end fossil fuel use immediately. They do not care who this action may hurt. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Bishop Harry Jackson is chairman of the High Impact Leadership Coalition and senior pastor of Hope Christian Church in Beltsville, MD, and co-authored, Personal Faith, Public Policy [FrontLine; March 2008] with Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council.

Be the first to read Harry Jackson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

The Poor
are always hit the hardest because they can't cut back any more than what they are doing. It comes down to eating or heating. If the greens are sucessful in their agenda, you can expect to have more people die of pneumonia from turning the heat down to 60 (in one case I know of, a bedridden man who wouldn't let his wife turn the thermostat above 58) Another woman was living in one room of her house during the winter. How many are going to pay with their lives during heat waves and bitter cold temperatures?
It is in the best interest of everyone, though, to go with the cheapest form of energy available. We were probably putting more CO2 into the atmosphere in the early 1900's due to the lack of insulation and double paned windows.
Global warming is a scam. Drill; it's the best option.

Ring Around the Green Collar
I know something about "green-collar." When I graduated, I thought waste recovery/recycling was a promising field. My 1st boss told me the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act actually discouraged re-use & recovery, & he was right. By 1985, they'd decided they didn't want waste recovered or destroyed, but rather, not generated in the US at all (i.e. send the industries out of the US!)

I'd be excited about 'innovations' if I didn't know from experience they'll just move the goalposts to accomplish their real agenda, which is totalitarian control. You can't outrun the obstructionists by innovating if they have arbitrary power to veto you.

Have you ever worked where they must get special licenses & permits to do business, such as a RCRA TSD facility? To change permitted the model # of a valve (which might have been discontinued by the manufacturer) can require a permit revision, which takes public hearings! Would you like to be required to get licenses to own & run a car, a furnace, etc. It'd be like zoning variances that can be arbitrarily denied by some snarky board member because they think 'you don't need it' or 'that house is too big' or 'you should live in town where you can bike or bus.' That's the brave new world coming!

It disturbs me when even John McCain will not limit his stoopid "cap & trade" proposal to what the actual science says, but dogmatically insists it's the right thing to do regardless of 'climate change.' It confirms to me that this is really just about arbitrary control of individuals' energy use, not controlling "climate change."
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.