Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Friday, May 30, 2008
David Limbaugh :: Townhall.com Columnist
McCain and National Security
by David Limbaugh
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What do you think of John McCain's selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate?



I'm aware of the widely held assumption that John McCain's path to victory in November requires him to capture a healthy percentage of independents and even Democrats. But his strategy could backfire if he doesn't restrain his urge to betray conservatives.

Because of his military record, his POW experiences and his pro-defense Senate record, McCain has a decided advantage over Barack Obama on national security, the most important issue for many voters and plenty important for the rest, as well.

Even McCain's outspoken support of the "unpopular" Iraq war, ironically, adds to his favorable national security image. This despite the Democrats' propagandizing against the war, their attempt to sever it conceptually from the overall war on terror, and their phony yet persistent argument that we've diverted resources away from fighting al-Qaida. The Democratic Party goes into any election with the burden of proving it can be trusted with power during times of war.

Yet for all our talk about McCain's comparative advantage on national security, many conservatives are nevertheless mystified at some of McCain's anomalous positions on the war on terror and his penchant for moving to the left here, as in so many other areas. Of all policy areas, you would think McCain could score a 100 percent among conservatives on national security, but his apparent desire for mainstream media approval and his addiction to projecting an image of unpredictability must be overwhelming.

Just this week, The Washington Post reported that McCain appears to be flip-flopping on his earlier position in favor of granting telecoms immunity for cooperating with President Bush in Bush's warrantless surveillance program to monitor terrorist activities. McCain has always sided with conservatives to deny the liberal trial lawyers their bonanza in going after these companies for rising to the president's call.

But now "a top lawyer for the McCain campaign" has suggested that the telecoms should be forced to explain their role in the program. This potential policy reversal would pull the rug out from under the Bush administration, which is currently in negotiations with Democratic members of Congress to resurrect this crucial surveillance program, which lapsed in March because of the telecom immunity issue. Just what is McCain thinking?

Even if this story turns out to be false, it is not that surprising to conservatives, who have watched with dismay other McCain positions, such as his denunciation of this nation's tough interrogation techniques of enemy prisoners as "torture."

McCain has also said that on his first day as president, he would close the Gitmo detention center and move the prisoners to Fort Leavenworth -- all in the interest of improving America's negative image in the world. But by boarding the Democrats' propaganda train here, McCain has already done more damage to our image than closing the prison could ever negate.

McCain has wisely offered to take Obama on a tour of Iraq to edify him on the progress we've made since the surge. Maybe in turn he should consider having his own eyes opened on other critical aspects of our national security effort. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
David Limbaugh, brother of radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, is an expert in law and politics and author of Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today's Democratic Party.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read David Limbaugh's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: National Security?
Mr. Limbaugh states, " Even McCain's outspoken support of the "unpopular" Iraq war, ironically, adds to his favorable national security image. This despite the Democrats' propagandizing against the war, their attempt to sever it conceptually from the overall war on terror, and their phony yet persistent argument that we've diverted resources away from fighting al-Qaida."

There are more people than just Democrats who believe that the war in Iraq had no legitimate connection to the War on Terror. It emphasized WMDs (which, by the way, the administration has failed to publish any evidence of). And it did take an enormous amount of resources away from Afghanistan; we got NATO involved to free up troops and equipment in order to invade Iraq. Almost seven years after 9/11bin Laden is still not captured or killed. It seems that the most important strategy in fighting terrorism is to blame the Democrats.

Next Mr. Limbaugh says, " But now 'a top lawyer for the McCain campaign' has suggested that the telecoms should be forced to explain their role in the program. This potential policy reversal would pull the rug out from under the Bush administration, which is currently in negotiations with Democratic members of Congress to resurrect this crucial surveillance program, which lapsed in March because of the telecom immunity issue. Just what is McCain thinking?"

It is quite possible that McCain realizes that what the administration was doing was illegal in the first place. If I recall, at least one telecom company refused to play along for that very reason. I thought Republicans and conservatives were all about the rule of law.

Mr. Limbaugh finally stated, " We conservatives are not demanding purity from McCain, but he sure ought to be more reliable across-the-board on his premier issue of national security."

Does that mean he's not going to vote for McCain this fall?

Well said ...
>>Therefore, we must prepare for the pain of another Jimmy Cater, so that the Reagan Revolution will again rise out of the wilderness and bring pride in, and common sense to the United States of America! May God Help the United States of America!

Amen, Mr. Edmundson - well said!

The next four years are lost. If McCain wins the Republican Party will be lost for the next decade; if McCain loses we can regroup for a conservative rebirth for 2012. The lesser of two evils voting foisted upon us since the since H.W. Bush's second run in 1992 continues to make things worse, not better.

You WILL enjoy this; it not only elaborates on your points, but also touches upon another posters ruminations as to McCain's stability.

"The Conservative Case Why We Should Refrain from McCain":

http://oceanstaterepublican.com/2008/02/10/the-conservative -case-why-we-should-refrain-from-mccain/
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone: