Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, May 02, 2008
Charles Krauthammer :: Townhall.com Columnist
Obama's Changing Moral Equivalence
by Charles Krauthammer
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Obama's Philadelphia oration was an exercise in contextualization. In one particularly egregious play on white guilt, Obama had the audacity to suggest that whites should be ashamed they were ever surprised by Wright's remarks: "The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright's sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour of American life occurs on Sunday morning."

That was then. On Tuesday, Obama declared that he himself was surprised at Wright's outrages. But hadn't Obama told us that surprise about Wright is a result of white ignorance of black churches brought on by America's history of segregated services? How then to explain Obama's own presumed ignorance? Surely he too was not sitting in those segregated white churches on those fateful Sundays when he conveniently missed all of Wright's racist rants.

Obama's turning surprise about Wright into something to be counted against whites -- one of the more clever devices in that shameful, brilliantly executed, 5,000-word intellectual fraud in Philadelphia -- now stands discredited by Obama's own admission of surprise. But Obama's liberal acolytes are not daunted. They were taken in by the first great statement on race: the Annunciation, the Chosen One comes to heal us in Philly. They now are taken in by the second: the Renunciation.

Obama's newest attempt to save himself after Wright's latest poisonous performance is now declared the new final word on the subject. Therefore, any future ads linking Obama and Wright are pre-emptively declared out of bounds, illegitimate, indeed "race-baiting"(New York Times editorial, April 30).

On what grounds? This 20-year association with Wright calls into question everything about Obama: his truthfulness in his serially adjusted stories of what he knew and when he knew it; his judgment in choosing as his mentor, pastor and great friend a man he just now realizes is a purveyor of racial hatred; and the central premise of his campaign, that he is the bringer of a "new politics," rising above the old Washington ways of expediency. It's hard to think of an act more blatantly expedient than renouncing Wright when his show, once done from the press club instead of the pulpit, could no longer be "contextualized" as something whites could not understand and only Obama could explain in all its complexity.

Turns out it was not that complex after all. Everyone understands it now. Even Obama.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Charles Krauthammer is a 1987 Pulitzer Prize winner, 1984 National Magazine Award winner, and a columnist for The Washington Post since 1985.

Be the first to read Charles Krauthammer's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Fallacy of Guilt by Association
I imagine that no one will read what I have to say at this point, but I can't help pointing out Mr. Krauthammers' misinterpretation of the following part of Obama's argument: "In one particularly egregious play on white guilt, Obama had the audacity to suggest that whites should be ashamed they were ever surprised by Wright's remarks: "The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright's sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour of American life occurs on Sunday morning." I've gone back to that speech and cannot find a single implication by Obama that white people should be ashamed of their surprise at Wright's comments. On the contrary, Obama's reference to "Sunday morning segregation" refers to how out of touch both black and white Americans are with one another when it comes to racism. In other words, come Sunday morning, depending on the church you're attending, you're going to hear racism talked about with two entirely different groups fingered for the blame. That's the dichotomy in our racial debates; blacks and whites talk about, rather than to, one another about racism and we use the same backward, fallacious reasoning to do so. Those are the problems that Obama's comment about "Sunday morning segregation" are really pointing to.

But perhaps what's most disappointing and dangerous about Krauthammers' argument is that it remains premised on the rhetorical fallacy of "guilt by association." Both parties play this game, but what's more pathetic is how many votes will be based on it.

Obama a poltical deceiver
I have a theory about MR.Obama. I think he is a wolf in sheep's garb, a political chameleon. I hope American's see thru that veneer of presidential visage. All this talk of associations with left wing radicals I think reveals a more sinister side to the man, a politcal ruthlessness, oppurtunism, ambition, hypocrisy and at the extreme dishonesty. I don't trust him one bit. Sounds like I am being alarmist about Obama, but I think this time I am right, there is too much evidence of this, no other conclusion can be reached. If he were a true uniter, his voting record would have revealed that like it does with MR.McCain, and his associations would have revealed a broader spectrum of political opinions. It is not that he shares the views of the folks at the church, but that these views did not trouble him, if I were a true uniter I would have found these views disturbing and would have disassociated myself from them earlier, but he did not, until I see or hear otherwise the only reason why he did not is political ambition. These associations helped him become a senator and now a nominee, and potentially the president of the largest superpower on the planet. All this talk of change, it is Obama who is changing right in front of our very eyes, he is turning from a deep blue to a purple just like a chameleon. Whatever it takes to become president, I guess. He is no uniter, he is no proponent of change, he is just another dishonest and divisive left wing politician infact a ruthless one at it.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.