Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, January 26, 2009
Burt Prelutsky :: Townhall.com Columnist
Do Either God or Al Gore Exist?
by Burt Prelutsky
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



Human beings like to believe they’re totally rational creatures. To take an extreme example, atheists are convinced they can prove that God doesn’t exist. This is a particularly fascinating phenomenon because among those who believed in God’s existence are such brainy people as Albert Einstein, Rene Descartes, Albert Schweitzer, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Johann Sebastian Bach, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Thomas Aquinas, John Milton, Michelangelo, Herman Melville and even the deeply cynical Graham Greene. While representing the opposing point of view, we have the likes of Madalyn Murray O’Hair and Bill Maher. And yet, any number of atheists who have to take off their shoes in order to count up to 11 are absolutely convinced they’re right.

In our own time, a great many people who are deeply skeptical when it comes to God are zealots when it comes to man-made global warming (aka climate change). Al Gore, who isn’t any more intelligent than Joe Biden and got worse grades in college than George W. Bush , is the high priest of what we might call the weather religion.

Now, in the distant past, mankind believed all sorts of things we now discount. For instance, people used to believe the earth was flat. They were also convinced that the sun revolved around the earth. While both beliefs have been proven wrong along the way, I’d say those people had far better reasons for believing hogwash than we do today.

I mean, it makes sense to believe the earth is flat. People are accustomed to flat surfaces. I can see a natural reluctance to accept the notion that the earth is round. After all, you can balance yourself on top of a large ball, but not on the bottom. So, if I lived hundreds of years ago, I would wonder why if the earth was round, people in places like Australia and Brazil and southern Africa didn’t fall off.

In the same way, it’s far more reasonable to believe the sun is revolving around the earth than to accept the notion that it’s vice versa. If the earth is spinning around and flying through space, how is it we don’t feel it moving? If we ride on a horse and we go only, say, ten miles an hour, we feel the wind in our face. But the earth is traveling thousands of miles an hour and we don’t even feel a slight breeze? Horsepockey! I would have said to Galileo Galilei. Balderdash! I would have said to Nicholas Copernicus.

But Al Gore is no Copernicus and he’s certainly no Galileo, and, furthermore, he’s making money hand over fist, not to mention copping Oscars and Nobel Prizes, peddling his malarkey to the besotted.

The fact that through all of recorded history, the earth has gotten warmer and cooler long before the internal combustion engine was even a gleam in Nicholas Cugnot’s eye, should suggest to everyone that Gore is peddling month-old fish. But so long as there are enough true believers to make it profitable, not to mention chic, the weather zealots will continue to trample truth and logic underfoot.

All hope is not lost, however. Quite recently, Sammy Wilson, who represents East Antrim in Parliament, and also serves as England’s environmental minister, dismissed man-made global warming as a gigantic con game. But, of course, I’m sure that Gore’s galoots will discount his judgment. After all, he’s merely a politician, whereas Al Gore is a…..god?

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
W. Burt Prelutsky is an accomplished, well-rounded writer and author of "The Secret of Their Success: Interviews with Legends and Luminaries."
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Dear Constantine (continued)
As for me citing NASA as my "Highest Authority in the topic", you need to read for understanding as I only cited NASA to refute another flat-earther like yourself who did the same to prove ACG was a hoax. NOAA is the proper source for climate studies. As for NASA's dependence on federal money; NASA's charter is space exploration and planetary science. A very small portion of NASA budget is devoted to Earth science. You are the one out on a limb here. And of course you fail to acknowledge that your team is heavily funded by interests that profit from keeping the debate going much like they did during the tobacco wars a few decades ago. We all know how that turned out: cigarettes are neither addictive nor harmful.

Cheers.

Dear Constantine
From your comments, it is clear that you are fully invested in your own belief system. Fine. I can see why someone with your beliefs would find someone like me arrogant but let me ask you how you can go against an entire world community of climate scientists based on the opinions of paid hacks and ideologues and not find that arrogant?

As for your silly "Kool-aid" remark, we spell the word "to" to, not ot. You must think you're superior to spell it backwards.

I did not "intentionally" swap terms regarding man's role. You are projecting your own sensitivities on the subject. There is something like a 99% probability that the climate changes we are seeing are anthropogenic and not naturally occurring. Sorry if you don't like it but that's the consensus.

JunkScience is run by Steve Milloy who is NOT a climate scientist. Here's some info on him:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=JunkScience.com

http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=881

The ICCC is not a scientific conference and most of the 70 so-called "world’s elite scientists specializing in climate issues" are not climate scientists at all (as a side note, I can match your 70 with THOUSANDS of actual climate scientists). Here's some funny information on last year's ICCC and the ICCC in general:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2008/01/what- if-you-held-a-conference-and-no-real-scientists-came/

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=International_Co nference_on_Climate_Change_(2009)
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.