Law Professor's Take on the SCOTUS Decision on Tariffs Will Likely Not Please...
The Trump Team Got a Serious Briefing on the 2026 Midterms This Week....
The Trans Ice Rink Shooter Story Just Took a Wild Turn
DC Water CEO: 'We Had Too Many White Men in Charge'
Here's the One Word That Describes US Women's Hockey at the Winter Olympics...
This Prosecutor Just Unveiled Shocking New Plan to Go After ICE Agents
Supreme Court Orders CNN to Respond
The Supreme Court Just Issued Their Ruling on President Trump's Tariffs
California Judge Orders Children's Hospital to Continue 'Gender-Affirming Surgeries' for M...
Susan Rice's Terrifying Vow If Democrats Take Back Power
To the Democrats' Dismay, the List of Hospitals Ending 'Gender-Affirming Surgeries' for Mi...
Democrats Go Blue in Profane Anti-Trump Illinois Senate Campaign Ad
The Democrats Just Picked the Worst Person to Give Their Response to the...
Wisconsin's Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos Will Not Seek Reelection
Republican Steve Hilton Surges to the Lead in California Gubernatorial Race
OPINION

Barbara Boxer’s Abortion Lie

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Barbara Boxer’s Abortion Lie

"How much time should she do?"

That question was posed by Newsweek columnist Anna Quindlen back in 2007. "She" is a woman who aborts a pregnancy; the "time" is the number of years she should spend behind bars for it.

Advertisement

Quindlen's question suggested that women were regularly imprisoned for having abortions prior to Roe v. Wade--and if we elect Republicans, thousands of women will again be headed for the jailhouse.

Rush Limbaugh

It's the myth that just won't go away. On Tuesday, California Senator Barbara Boxer used it to attack challenger Carly Fiorina's anti-abortion stance, saying it would "mean women in jail. That is so out of touch with Californians."

Sounds scary. Boxer echoed a group called the Winning Message Action Fund, which released a video in 2008 titled "How Much Time?" In between images of crying and distraught women getting their mug shots, the narrator intones: "John McCain and Sarah Palin want to overturn Roe v. Wade, which protects a woman's right to choose. If that happens, 21 states will immediately move to make abortion a crime. And women will be treated like criminals."

It's true that at least 21 states want to make abortion a crime. But the next statement is a deliberate lie. Women in this country have never been treated like criminals for having an abortion; only the person who performs it has.

If we take some pro-choicers' claims at face value, thousands of women were rotting in prison before Roe v. Wade, tried and convicted of murder for having an abortion. In reality, only two have ever been prosecuted: a Pennsylvania woman in 1911, a Texan in 1922. (The charges against the Pennsylvanian were quickly thrown out.) This is insignificant as far as historical injustices go. In the 19th century, a dozen Americans were convicted of murdering people who later turned out to be alive. Our justice system has always been far from perfect, but contrary to pro-choice mythology, women seeking abortions aren't among the victims.

Advertisement

Women have never gone to jail for performing self-abortions, either. Villanova Law professor Joseph Dellapenna looked into the matter for his book, Dispelling Myths of Abortion History, and concluded that no American woman had ever stood trial for inducing her own abortion. The last known prosecution happened in England in 1599.

Today, not one proposed abortion ban criminalizes the woman who has an abortion. In fact, measures like the infamous South Dakota abortion ban of 2006 made no mention of her--only of the person performing it. The doctor is the one subjected to jail time and fines. The doctor is the only person these laws aim to punish.

If pro-choice activists have faith in the movement, they need to do better than trotting out a scenario that never happened in this country and claiming it's a historical reality on the verge of re-emerging. If they truly have the moral high ground, they have nothing to lose from being honest.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement