Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, October 12, 2009
Allen Hunt :: Townhall.com Columnist
A Letter to our Nobel Winner
by Allen Hunt
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Congratulations, Mr. President, you won the Nobel Peace Prize. Now it is time for you to earn it since your nomination was submitted just after you had actually taken office.

Nevertheless, it is possible for you to make some strides in lending legitimacy to an award whose nobility (or nobelity as the case may be) has been less tarnished ever since Al Gore won for his very nice PowerPoint presentation about polar bears. You can restore some semblance of “peace” to the Nobel Peace Prize.

Going Rogue by Sarah Palin FREE

Please begin by withdrawing America's troops from Afghanistan. Stop the dithering. In the middle of the many things you consider “urgent,” focus on matters of war and peace. You alone are the Commander in Chief. Peggy Noonan was right when she characterized you as “the anti-Lincoln.”. Whereas Lincoln, your ideal, focused every day of his presidency on the war at hand, even personally tracking down General McClellan in bars and parlors, you have barely made time to meet with your own appointed leader, General McChrystal. Then, when he embarrassed you by speaking to the press, he got your attention. If peace is the aim, your attention and focus are key.

American troops are serving gallantly in circumstances that cannot be described as promising. General McChrystal desires to win in Afghanistan. Of course he does. He is a soldier, and a good one at that. He asks for more troops to execute on the mission you gave him in March, the very mission you now are re-evaluating in a long, drawn-out process.

What none of your advisors is telling you is this: it is time not only to reassess the strategy for our war in Afghanistan, but more importantly, to reassess the morality of our war in Afghanistan.

In order to justify morally the use of arms and force, a number of pre-conditions must be met. The use of violent force should be a measure of last resort. War should be an act of defense rather than an act of offense or aggression. Violence inflicted should not proportionally dwarf the violence that is prevented by that action. And most importantly, war and force should only be exercised when there is a reasonable chance of success.

This last condition of what is commonly referred to as “just war theory” brings Afghanistan into clear focus. What exactly would constitute “success” in Afghanistan? Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Allen Hunt is the host of the natioanlly syndicated talk radio program, the Allen Hunt show.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Allen Hunt's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
No wonder!
I came across this quote today,by Karl Marx...

"The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."

Again,it's all about the Words!(Their Peace and ours is not the same!)


Akagi @ 11:33
"A number have in fact. The US in Iraq (1991), Japan (1905)and many more we could list."

The US didn't go any further because the UN resolution only authorized ejecting the Iraqis from Kuwait, not conquering Iraq. Had a letter published in COMMENTARY on that subject, referencing the Bush-Scowcroft book review by Kagan. Japan wasn't ready to face the potential of a massive Russian Army assault to regain lost territory.

"100% false. Again see Japan in 1905 or in 1895. Japan didn't fight its way all the way to St. Petersburg or Beijing now did it?"

I don't think Japan was willing to go further into China because it recognized it had achieved its aims (Taiwan and Korea). And both sides in the Russo-Japanese War wanted a peace. The Japanese worried that the Russian Army would slowly work its way across Siberia and threaten Korea, making life difficult for the Japanese government. The idea that Japan would try to cross Siberia in 1905 is ludicrous, almost worthy of comparison to Yamamoto's WWII era statement of what it would take to force a peace with the US.

The US could have kept Cuba and the Phippines after 1898, but it didn't. Cuba was independent shortly after the war and the Philippines were promised independence during the 1930s, which was granted on July 4, 1946. Should have given up Puerto Rico at the same time as Cuba.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.