Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Hugh Hewitt :: Townhall.com Columnist
Airing the Ayers-Obama Connection
by Hugh Hewitt
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



Before we comment on the significance of Barack Obama's connection to William Ayers, the domestic terrorist from the '60s Weatherman Underground, let's get the facts of the connection out.

On February, 22 Ben Smith of Politico.com wrote this introduction to his story on the Obama-Ayers relationship:

In 1995, State Senator Alice Palmer introduced her chosen successor, Barack Obama, to a few of the district’s influential liberals at the home of two well known figures on the local left: William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

While Ayers and Dohrn may be thought of in Hyde Park as local activists, they’re better known nationally as two of the most notorious — and unrepentant — figures from the violent fringe of the 1960s anti-war movement.

Now, as Obama runs for president, what two guests recall as an unremarkable gathering on the road to a minor elected office stands as a symbol of how swiftly he has risen from a man in the Hyde Park left to one closing in fast on the Democratic nomination for president.

“I can remember being one of a small group of people who came to Bill Ayers’ house to learn that Alice Palmer was stepping down from the senate and running for Congress,” said Dr. Quentin Young, a prominent Chicago physician and advocate for single-payer health care, of the informal gathering at the home of Ayers and his wife, Dohrn. “[Palmer] identified [Obama] as her successor.”

Obama and Palmer “were both there,” he said.

Three days earlier, the New York Sun had reported some additional details:

As an Illinois state senator in 2001, Mr. Obama accepted a $200 contribution from William Ayers, a founding member of the group that bombed the U.S. Capitol and the Pentagon during the 1970s.

Mr. Ayers wrote a memoir, "Fugitive Days," published in 2001, and on the day of the September 11 terrorist attacks, he was quoted by the New York Times as saying: "I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough."

He and Mr. Obama served together on the nine-member board of the Woods Fund, a Chicago nonprofit, for three years beginning in 1999, and they have also appeared jointly on two academic panels, one in 1997 and another in 2001. Mr. Ayers, who was never convicted in the Weather Underground bombings, is now a professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

So we have at least a political friendship that began in 1995, and they became professional colleagues in 1999.

More details will certainly emerge if the MSM decides that the Democratic front-runner's association with a terrorist matters to voters.

And that is how the issue should be framed. William Ayers was a terrorist, and as of a few years ago, --if we believe the New York Times-- an unrepentant terrorist.

Does it matter? On Wednesday night, Obama made the case that it didn't in this exchange with George Stephanopoulos:

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Senator, if you get the nomination, you'll have to -- (applause) -- (inaudible).

I want to give Senator Clinton a chance to respond, but first a follow-up on this issue, the general theme of patriotism in your relationships. A gentleman named William Ayers, he was part of the Weather Underground in the 1970s. They bombed the Pentagon, the Capitol and other buildings. He's never apologized for that. And in fact, on 9/11 he was quoted in The New York Times saying, "I don't regret setting bombs; I feel we didn't do enough."

An early organizing meeting for your state senate campaign was held at his house, and your campaign has said you are friendly. Can you explain that relationship for the voters, and explain to Democrats why it won't be a problem?

SEN. OBAMA: George, but this is an example of what I'm talking about.

This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who's a professor of English in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He's not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.

And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn't make much sense, George.

The fact is, is that I'm also friendly with Tom Coburn, one of the most conservative Republicans in the United States Senate, who during his campaign once said that it might be appropriate to apply the death penalty to those who carried out abortions.

Do I need to apologize for Mr. Coburn's statements? Because I certainly don't agree with those either.

So this kind of game, in which anybody who I know, regardless of how flimsy the relationship is, is somehow -- somehow their ideas could be attributed to me -- I think the American people are smarter than that. They're not going to suggest somehow that that is reflective of my views, because it obviously isn't.

Hillary Clinton wasn't buying Obama's attempt to dodge the implications of Obama's freindship with a terrorist. Here's what she added:

SEN. CLINTON: Well, I think that is a fair general statement, but I also believe that Senator Obama served on a board with Mr. Ayers for a period of time, the Woods Foundation, which was a paid directorship position.

And if I'm not mistaken, that relationship with Mr. Ayers on this board continued after 9/11 and after his reported comments, which were deeply hurtful to people in New York, and I would hope to every American, because they were published on 9/11 and he said that he was just sorry they hadn't done more. And what they did was set bombs and in some instances people died. So it is -- you know, I think it is, again, an issue that people will be asking about. And I have no doubt -- I know Senator Obama's a good man and I respect him greatly but I think that this is an issue that certainly the Republicans will be raising.

That's where the issue sits as we head into the last lap in the Keystone State full of bitter, gun-toting, illegal-immigrant hating Jesus freaks. But it is too bad that neither Stephanopoulos or Charles Gibson followed up on the subject of the significance of Ayers.

One of the key questions for a president is where do you draw your team from? Who are your friends? What and who influenced you?

We know that indicted and in-the-dock now Tony Rezko influenced Barack Obama --Rezko is Obama's mentor and financier, enabling the not-yet-wealthy Obamas to buy a house.

We know Jeremiah Wright was Obama's mentor and pastor influenced Obama, and despite the many attempts by Obama to rewrite his own history, the friendship between Obama and Wright is deep and significant.

So now we come to Ayers. Here's the opening of the wikipedia entry on Ayers as of this writing:

William C. ("Bill") Ayers (born 1944) is a Distinguished Professor of Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He was a 1960s-era political activist and former member of the Weather Underground.

Ayers is the son of Thomas Ayers, former Chairman and CEO of Commonwealth Edison. He grew up in Glen Ellyn, a suburb of Chicago, and attended Lake Forest Academy. According to his memoir, he became radicalized at the University of Michigan where he became involved in the New Left and the SDS. He briefly worked as a schoolteacher.

Ayers joined the Weather Underground in 1969, but went underground with several associates after the Greenwich Village townhouse explosion in 1970 which killed three members (Ted Gold, Terry Robbins, and Diana Oughton, who was Ayers' girlfriend at the time). While underground, he and fellow member Bernardine Dohrn had two children, Zayd and Malik. They were purged from the group in the mid-1970s, and turned themselves in to the authorities in 1981. All charges against him were dropped because of prosecutorial misconduct during the long search for the fugitives. They married, and later became legal guardians of Chesa Boudin, the biological son of former Weathermen David Gilbert and Kathy Boudin, after his parents were arrested for their part in the Brinks robbery (1981). In the 1980s Ayers undertook graduate training in education and earned his doctorate in 1987. He has served on the board of the Woods Fund of Chicago, a anti-poverty philanthropic foundation, since 1999. He has edited and written many books and articles on education theory, policy and practice.

So, what does Obama think of this past and its significance for the present? More critically, what do mainstream American voters think?

When will the MSM get around to a sustained examination of Obama's ideological history? Thus far the farthest left major party candidate in American political history has received the least scrutiny of any modern near nominee of a major party.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Hugh Hewitt is host of a nationally syndicated radio talk show. Hugh Hewitt's new book is The War On The West.

Be the first to read Hugh Hewitt's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Obama's judgment...or lack of.
What sticks out to me through out all of this is that Obama, early in his campaign boasted about his superior judgment to Hillary. Well, his ties to indicted Tony Rezko, Pastor Wright & wife Michele Obama (Both Anti-American racists) and now his long time relationship with self confessed domestic terrorist Bill Ayers show a complete LACK OF JUDGMENT.

Oh, and to SteveL. You made the argument that Ayers was innocent until proven guilty so any University should not hold his past against him, right? But you miss the FACT that HE CONFESSED!!! BY HIS OWN ACKNOWLEDGMENT HE IS NOT INNOCENT, whether or not proven guilty in a court of law.

Back to Obama. Reading his first book, learning about his friends I can come to only one conclusion. Obama needs to be kept out of the White House if just for the reason to keep these Anti-American bigots from getting unfettered access to the White House.

Although I am NOT a child pornographer, nor do I believe in what the child pornographers stand for and profess, if I continually have a relationship with child pornographers this shows a lack of judgment and character on my part and that should be held against me if I were trying to attain the highest office in the country. No matter what I say, those relationships speak for themselves.

B. Hussain Obama lacks the character and judgment to ever be considered for President and it amazes me that there are so many people that refuse to see that.

scrutiny
Those that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Hugh didn't exactly scrutinize his man Romney, the most liberal republican candidate. So why does he expect the leftist media to scrutinize their favorite?

check this out
McCain did a recent interview with Stephanopolous where he condemns Baracks relationship with Ayres but disregards his own dealings with an extremist pastor

http://campaigncircus.com/video_player.php?v=9190

Captain Conservative
You are partially correct. Iraq was not invaded in order to steal their oil. Quite the contrary. Iraq was invaded in order to limit the amount of oil they could sell. What businesses are the Bush family, Cheney and most of the top adminstration officials in? Oil and the "defense" industry. What industries have made the most money the last 5 years? Oil and "defense". You think they are not making their share of those record setting profits?

If you combine Bush's fantasy of being a "war president", his desire for revenge for the "hit" Saddam tried to put on his father and his belief that god told him to invade Iraq along with Cheney's greed and desire for unlimited power as well as the neocon's desire to protect Isreal- mix it all together- and you get the brilliant idea that invading Iraq is a can't lose proposition. Then you top it off with the administration's and Rumsfeld's apparent incompetance and you get the mess Iraq is today.

Notice the use of the word "apparent" in the above sentence? I do not believe ANYONE could be as incompentant at planning and executing a war as this administration wants us to think they are.

Obama's Friends
Obama needs much more scrutiny -- hopefully some of the TV anchors will analyze the collection of unsavory characters with which Obama has been "tight." No one brings up the fact that he is a disciple of Saul Alinsky, the radical organizer -- his community activism is a euphemism for agitation against all that conservatives hold dear.

He is in favor of a ban on handguns, but pretends to be for the 2nd amendment. He even voted against the Born Alive bill that would require that a baby that survives an abortion attempt be given medical care to preserve its life. Nice guy. Wait till he decides that your life is not worth the money it costs to save it when he gets the universal care that he desires.

Lay down with dogs, get up with fleas...
One wonders if Obama would be as comfortable having a drink with Tim McVey or sharing a boy with Osama bin Ladin?

How does President Obama sound to your ears?

QUESTION TIME
Whomever wrote "Obama should have" needs to take the time several Sunday evenings on C-SPAN and watch Question Time for the Prime Minister.

I have beeen listening to the answers "Ahs" and "Ohs" looking for language from both the Thigh-Master and the O'BoomBox.

Question Time does not allow the time for Ah's and Oh's or shoulda-woulda stuttering, it is a blood sport verbal saber match. I am no great lover of Labour PM Gordon Brown and am Tory leaning towards David Cameron but I can say assuredly that these two know how to deliver a rhetorical punch.

Comparatively, both Democrats are PUTZ!

A final comment

You’ll notice that Obama launched into his standby “I’m the son of ……and a woman from Kansas” after his defensiveness about his questionable associations and lack of leadership. That was embarrassing to hear. It was clear he was trying to bring to remembrance the uncritical adulation of his crowds who responded to him so emotionally months ago before they started learning more about his associations and his voting record.

Why aren’t there more debates on non-cable TV? Millions of people, especially those who are poor, cannot afford cable TV.

Obama should have been forthcoming

Obama should have been forthcoming in Wednesday night's debate about how his early political campaign received a boost in 1995 at a function hosted at the home of Weathermen terrorists William Ayers and wife Bernadine Dohrn, once on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted List. He could have explained he didn't know about their history. Instead, he said Ayers is someone who lives in his neighborhood.

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/challenges.php

I was surprised at how discomfitted Obama looked while he responded to questions about his associations with William Ayers and Rev. Wright. He did not display leadership style at all. Then, he childishly whined about it with his supporters. This is a very inexperienced guy who wants to lead our nation. His demeanor and responses wouldn’t even make it as CEO of a company much less as a president giving a press conference. Hillary Clinton, whom I don’t particularly like, came off sounding experienced, gracious, and much better suited for higher office.

Obama should have been forthcoming

Obama should have been forthcoming in Wednesday night's debate about how his early political campaign received a boost in 1995 at a function hosted at the home of Weathermen terrorists William Ayers and wife Bernadine Dohrn, once on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted List. He could have explained he didn't know about their history. Instead, he said Ayers is someone who lives in his neighborhood.

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/challenges.php

I was surprised at how discomfitted Obama looked while he responded to questions about his associations with William Ayers and Rev. Wright. He did not display leadership style at all. Then, he childishly whined about it with his supporters. This is a very inexperienced guy who wants to lead our nation. His demeanor and responses wouldn’t even make it as CEO of a company much less as a president giving a press conference. Hillary Clinton, whom I don’t particularly like, came off sounding experienced, gracious, and much better suited for higher office.

Obama should have repudiated Ayers

There’s more information available about the Woods Fund and its grant to a questionable Arab group while Obama and Ayers sat on the Wood Fund board.

World Net Daily: http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57231

Although Obama probably wouldn't have known about Ayers initially, his remark in last night's debate about his being 8 years old when Ayers committed his crimes pandered to the young. Obama should have repudiated Ayers particularly because on September 11, 2001, Ayers said in the New York Times he regretted not having done more than setting bombs in the 70's. Instead, Obama pandered to the young. Obama made an important point about Bill Clinton's pardon of several Weatherman. However, as a presidential aspirant, Obama really blundered in not repudiating Ayers and his acts.

One really has to wonder about the Woods Fund board with someone like Ayers on it.

Obama should have repudiated Ayers

There’s more information available about the Woods Fund and its grant to a questionable Arab group while Obama and Ayers sat on the Wood Fund board.

World Net Daily: http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57231

Although Obama probably wouldn't have known about Ayers initially, his remark in last night's debate about his being 8 years old when Ayers committed his crimes pandered to the young. Obama should have repudiated Ayers particularly because on September 11, 2001, Ayers said in the New York Times he regretted not having done more than setting bombs in the 70's. Instead, Obama pandered to the young. Obama made an important point about Bill Clinton's pardon of several Weatherman. However, as a presidential aspirant, Obama really blundered in not repudiating Ayers and his acts.

One really has to wonder about the Woods Fund board with someone like Ayers on it.






Obama - The Selfish Opportunist
Obama is an opportunist that exploits others for his own political gain. He used Dr. Wright's friendship, church and parishoners to gain black credibility in Chicago. Ayers, another influential black with important connections for Chicago, was just one more link in Obama's exploitation chain.

When you are a blatant expoiter of others, sooner or later, as Dr. Wright offered, the chickens come home to roost.

Hugh, get a new crystal ball!
Hugh Hewitt asks, "When will the MSM get around to a sustained examination of Obama's ideological history? Thus far, the farthest left major party candidate in American political history has received the least scrutiny of any modern near nominee of a major party."

Is Hugh really in a position to give advice to the MSM?

Remember Hugh's 2004 tome, "If It's Not Close, They Can't Cheat: Crushing the Democrats in Every Election and Why Your Life Depends on It" Voters re-elected Bush, after giving the GOP an expanded majority in Congress in the 2002 elections. Hugh was unsderstandably giddy over the prospects of the GOP remaining in power, but his optimism would be short-lived.

Does anyone remember Hugh's 2006 tome, "Painting the Map Red: The Fight to Create a Permanent Republican Majority"? Hugh actually thought voters would award the GOP with permanent majority status in Congress for the next 25 years! Instead, voters put the Democrats in power.

Then came Hugh's fawning biography of Mitt Romney in his 2007 book, "110 Things Every American Should Know about Mitt Romney" Republicans rejected Hugh's advice and nominated McCain as their 2008 Presidential candidate.

Perhaps Hugh should run a contest on his radio show to solicit prospective titles for a new book after Obama or Hillary is elected. If past titles are any indication, Hugh and his publisher have amply demonstrated a profound lack of premonitory insight into the mind of both Republicans and the electorate in general.

Perhaps Hugh needs a new crystal ball!







Birds of a feather
etc. It's about time someone began looking into Obama!! It's as if people were rats following the pied piper.
He could say ANYTHING, and people would swoon. No questions asked. How long did we say ,listen to him, he is saying nothing.
I hope it's not to late to find out what he really stands for. And I believe it's Marxism.

for Vic: presumption of innocence
Vic asks: "why...do State officials continue to hire these kinds of people as teachers?"

Presumption of innocence. In this country, you are presumed innocent until convicted by a court of law. Bill Ayers was never convicted of terrorism.

You could ask why do state officials hire New Left radicals. That's poor judgment. But they can't refuse to hire you just because you were ACCUSED of a crime for which you were never convicted.

We had an interesting case in Massachusetts where I live:

The girlfriend of a well-known endocrinologist, Dr. Timothy Stryker, was found strangled to death, in a car in the parking lot of the medical office where he works. Suspicion centered on the physician. But they could never find enough evidence to convict him. So he's still a practicing physician with lots of patients. The woman's family has filed a wrongful death suit though, which is still in litigation.

http://tinyurl.com/3zy4v7

for Vic: the exclusionary rule
Vic asks: "why does prosecutorial misconduct give a terrorist a free get out of jail card?"

The so-called "exclusionary rule" states that evidence that is illegally obtained cannot be used in court, even if that means the defendant can be acquitted without that evidence.

That precedent was established for Federal law by a Supreme Court ruling in 1914. And in the landmark Supreme Court case Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the liberal Warren Court extended that rule to cover state law enforcement as well.

So we have nearly 100 years of Supreme Court rulings that evidence obtained illegally cannot be used in court, even if that means the defendant must be acquitted.

Liberals ALWAYS cuddle with our enemies.
Obama's friendly associations with Ayers, an anti-America traitor, aren't at all unique or unusual. Let's look at other such examples of liberals cuddling with enemies of the United States:

Bard College, to this very day, maintains an "Alger Hiss Chair for Social Studies". Note that Hiss was convicted of lying about his spying on the US for the Soviet Union.

While Jane Fonda was watching the Viet Cong torture US POWs, John Kerry was meeting in France with leaders of the Communist Vietnamese.

General Wesely Clark, former Democratic presidential candidate, was fired from his position as NATO Commander because he was caught having little parties with the commanders of the very same people that were killing our troops in Kosovo.

And last but certianly not least, former President Jimmy Carter recenly visited Israel where he spent some time shmoozing with the leader of Hamas and laid a wreath at the grave of terrorist Yasser Arafat.

The left has always felt at home with enemies of the United States, and our enemies have always felt comfortable with liberals. Heck, Hamas has just endorsed Obama! (And, NO, that is NOT a joke.)

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Hamas_Endorses_Obama/200 8/04/17/88754.html

I am Frustrated
This story about Ayers shows how lazy journalism is. I got to thinking yesterday and checked to find out that Ayers is on David Horowitz's list of 100 most dangerous professors in America. That usually meant that a professor was intimidating and indoctrinating Marxism. If this were properly reearched Obama couldn't claim it was about when he was eight.
There is a cadre of people who are working to foment revolution, and our glitzy press doesn't even know who they are. We have two choices. Protect ourselves and prevent revolution or expect to lose our heads in the purges that come. I favor the premptive purge.

That's it?!?
That's it?!?

White Leftists
There is a history of radical white leftists trying to manipulate blacks. Black writers Ralph Ellison and Richard Wright wrote about it in seminal novels 'Invisible Man' and 'Native Son.' White leftists want the power to trigger black riots to bring 'The Revolution.'

I won't draw any quick conclusions on Obama's links to the Weather Underground, but I won't dismiss it either. Obama should welcome the chance to answer these questions in the debate, instead of crying about it.

The history between black power and white radicals is one of those 'complexities' Obama said we have to 'work through' in our 'national conversation about race' before we can solve our problems of health care and jobs. So Gibson and Steph were just following Obama's advice from his big 'race speech.'

You can be sure of one thing -- Obama's white leftist supporters are up to their old game of trying to co-opt 'black power.' You see it in their brazen use of the race card, ultra-left whites 'crying race' on mainstream whites and Reagan Democrats. Whether Obama himself is a patsy for white leftists or not, I'm sure Jesse Jackson Jr., Rev. Wright, Rev. Sharpton and Spike Lee are not patsies for William Ayers and Daily Kos.


EASY MONEY
To: IMPEACH BUSH GUY

Prove you are not totally stupid and make big bucks sitting nude in front of your computer.

Contact GEORGE SOROS
I'll give you the contact info just for asking. George Soros has $6,000,000,000.oo to $10,000,000,000.oo so what you charge will be chump change to this guy.

++++++ Easy Money Pal - Take Adantage! ++++++

Dumbama
There is a connection between Ayers and Obama. It is disgraceful that terrorists like Ayers are given respect in Democratic politics. But those are the facts.

Politically, Obama merely should have said he knows Ayers and completely denounces his past illegal actions. And that is it.

Bringing Tom Coburn into this was a really stupid idea. There are some independents and moderates who may be turned off by that comparsion.

That is why I am calling him Dumbama.

beowulfe
But you know if you add then serial numbers on a dollar bill and multiply the sum by the number of serrations on the great seal (all-seeing eye) you will get a number which when added to the number printed in invisible ink on the back of the Declaration of Independence will always equal 911.

Ayers
Ayers, just another draft dodging, dope headed coward now idolized by Hillary and Obama.

Sen. Obama's evasions
For those of you still supporting Sen. Obama, or thinking about doing so, ask yourselves this question. Why is Sen. Obama evading these issues?

First Jeremiah Wright: Sen. Obama hasn't remotely come clean about what he heard from Mr. Wright, and what he didn't. He denied hearing several specific and outrageous comments. OK, I accept his word on that. He used misleading lawyerese at first, denying hearing the specific comments that created the current controversy. He admitted hearing things he called "controversial," but without any specifics. He further admitted that Mr. Wright's views reflected a "profoundly distorted" view of America.

Now William Ayers: Sen. Obama clearly has some moderate association with Mr. Ayers over the years. Now I've associated with a lot of people, and don't know much about many of them. Perhaps Sen. Obama was ignorant of Mr. Ayers's criminal and traitorous past.

The question in both cases is clear: what did Sen. Obama know, and when did he know it?

The fact that he won't tell us -- and that when he misleads and misdirects when does tell us something, is a source of grave concern to me, and should be to everybody.

In partial defense of Sen. Obama, though, I think that too much is being made on both sides of candidates "accepting" contributions made by controversial figures. Anyone can write and mail a check, or give a credit card donation over the internet. We shouldn't expect campaigns to scrutinize these lists and return funds from "controversial" sources.

so impeachbush
How come they haven't gotten you yet?

OBAMA = RACIST
I read Barack Obama's Philadelphia "Speech" with intent on finding essence and substantive depth in this man. The 5,000 words consisted of approximately 35 paragraphs.

What I surmised from his words was: "gone to some of the best schools in America" from which instead of gratitude and transcending narrow racial thinking and attitudes Barack Obama proceeded to discuss color, color, race, muddle, more excuses, thick Biblical analogy, closed black racism, racial prejudice, past-present personality lock, racial accusations towards non-blacks, more muddled economic theory, mushiness, static societal attitudes and opinions, added racism, rage and sympathy suck demagoguery.

This may have been the speech that made Chris Matthews pee in his pants, but I found nothing Churchillian, Lincolnesque, or inspiring as from Martin Luther King.

I concede, I did not cross the Bridge at Selma; ergo, my sins of omission are there but to construe and thus call me a "racist" in fact or form is gross injustice which I stand in complete opposition and rejection.

Mr. Obama, I do not measure you by the color of your skin but I do consider your words to be measurement of your thoughts.


Put the tin foil hat back on.
Yes, yes, we know Peach, The Illuminati, with the help of PNAC and the AIDS virus, are really responsible for 9/11.

You know, I also heard evil Republican aliens from the planet Zimbob used their magical death ray from outer space to zap those levies in New Orleans to kill off all those blacks in a big flood.

Sheesh, what a freakin' whackjob you are!

Peachbush
Your vision of an Obama presidency borders on certainty. I would like to test your certainty with a wager, but I found that most of you libs do not wish to risk your allowance money on your certainties.

Aren't they cute?
Their "favowitest candydate in da hole wyde werld" is caught shmoozing with an America-hating terrorist, and the best Phylo and the rest of the kooky commies can come up with is either shout "BOOSH IZA POOPYHEAD!" or firmly ensconcing their fingers in their ears, shutting tight their eye lids, and screaming "LALALA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU! STAINT OBAMA IS PERFECT! LALALA!"

This is simply more IRREFUTABLE proof that no matter what B. Hussein Obama does or has done, wacko fascists on the left will still support him. Obama could LITTERALLY be caught on video stabbing his own children in the face, and Phylo will come on here screaming about how only "nuts" on the right care about "non-issues" like the murder of his own children.

That is the difference between liberals and conservatives. Liberals stand behind a person at all costs, no matter how horrible that person is. Conservatives stand behind principles, and aren't afraid to oppose those who betray those principles, even if that means opposing someone whom they once supported.

Keep it up liberals
You have not supplied republicans with as much humor and amusement as you have since the debate. Your hysteria, anger, invective, name calling, character assassination etc reveals how very worried you are that Obama has begun to be revealed. Hooray. More to come. Watch your blood pressure lefties.

Dear inpeachbush
You are not making yourself clear enough on how you stand or what your beliefs are, could you please explain.

Tibby

Phylo
"I'm sure this story will be very important to the 20% of the population that is given to wild conspiracy theories, but it will have no legs with sensible people."
---------------
Exactly! Which is why the lefts manifold conspiracies don't fly with MORE than 80% of the populace. Like the twin tower conspiracies, AIDS conspiracies, Hep B & C conspiracies, blood for oil, etc. It is the far left that holds license to every known conspiracy that ever surfaced.

It is also the left who invoke the past, as far back as an infants nurse in a maternity ward, and call it revelant information. But not a soul can mention so much as a comment or relationship for longer than an hour ago without being insulted, slandered, and attacked.

It would also be the left who find offenses, like conspiracies, everywhere. Even when we call someone by their given birth name, it is now a racist comment. B. Hussein Obama is a racist remark! You'll never have to worry about me calling him that. I reference him by a more appropriate title, BS Obuttma.

Peachbush
It would seem that the choir boy is an unfortunate slip of the tongue, given his recent church flap. Yet another association from which he must distance himself.

See any pattern here???

impeachbush
You must be referring to the Clinton crime family. Remember the Arkancides and the rapes and Whitewater etc.etc.etc...

impeachbush
I think you must be referring to the Clinton crime family. Remember the Arkancides and the serial rapist.

impeachbush fool
Impeachbush,
If any of what you said was true, the prosecution would be done already. But then, what liberal like yourself has any concern with the truth? Just kepp throwing the BS and hopefully you will get some to stick, Right?

Hewitt the hysteric
I'm sure this story will be very important to the 20% of the population that is given to wild conspiracy theories, but it will have no legs with sensible people. Why? Because it is preposterous to believe that Barack Obama is a radical. His positions and his demeanor are far too moderate to make that label stick.

Of course, that won't stop hewitt from trying

Peachbush
I think you mean 'drag Obama BACK into the slimey gutter'. At least that is what is becoming increasingly apparent.

You can't chose your family
But you can chose your Pastor, your friends and your business associates.

Is there anyone Obama is connected to that isn't a terrorist, a racist, or a political exortionist?

Hugh
Do you really expect the media to air and inspect O'Vomit's negatives? They are too busy bowing down and worshipping the big-eared golden calf.

There are two other very interesting questions here. The first one is why does prosecutorial misconduct give a terrorist a free get out of jail card? What prosecutorial misconduct should mean is that two people go to jail instead of one. The second question is why in the four corners of Hades do State officials continue to hire these kinds of people as teachers?

As for O'Vomit, his worshippers will continue to fawn over him regardless of what he does or has done. As I posted a few weeks ago, they will still support him if you had a video of him dismembering and eating the entrails of a 9 week old puppy. Simply put, they are not rational so one should not expect rational behavior.

Hey Impeachdiscobush
Walk away from the crack pipe. I am soooo tired of this b.s. about blood for oil. The U.S. doesn't need Iraqi oil. Fact is most of our oil comes from Hugo Chavez, Mexico & other countries closer to home. It is too expensive to ship here. If the US and Bush were motivated by oil: Why has it sided with Israel, which has none? Why did the US favor a total oil embargo on Iraq when Saddam was in power? When the Frogs & the Russians wanted to lift the caps on Iraqi oil sales, why did we oppose it? If any nations base their foreign policy on oil it is those two countries. Let's put it in perspective, Iraq produces 2 mil barrels a day, the total world production is 76 mil a day. Is the war on terror to secure less then 3% of the world's oil production. Put that in your crack pipe and smoke it you pathetic little limp wristed weasel

There are not boring subjects ...
only boring people. Yawn.

Sad for Obama and His Sista Souljah
we gun-loving Jesus freaks can read, and we do read; and worse luck for him, lots of us were a lot older than 8 when Ayers et al. were plying their trade.

Sorry, Barry, but not everybody over 50 suffers from Alzeimers. The truth is true.

impeachbush
Once again, the subject is Ayers-Obama. Bush is not a candidate, his peccadillos are irrelevant and so is your post. Post holer is irrelevant too, but at least he is short and quicker to scroll past.

for maverick
maverick writes: "Where is it written in terms where Conservatives can understand, that Democrats aren't about to abandon their candidate because of what the Conservatives says about them."

We're NOT expecting to influence the Democrats to abandon their candidate.

We're expecting to influence Independent voters to stop supporting the Democrat candidate.

Hillary and her surrogates are doing our work for us, by attacking Obama in this way, legitimizing these same attacks, so we can reuse them on Obama ourselves after the convention. They can't be easily ruled out of bounds after Hillary's supporters had already raised them.

Hillary is too much of an egomaniac to care that she's doing that.

Stuck on MSM
Desperate means calls for desperate measures. I know your trying as hard as you can to make an impact in this election the way Rush is with his Operation Chaos, but who in the world thinks the MSM which is mostly liberal is going to eat one of their own. Obama is a liberal. Why should the MSM pick up stories Conservative talk radio tabloids comes up with. It's not going to happen for you, Rush, Sean Hannity, Laura, Mark, or Ann. Get it. Are you beginning to understand now why the MSM won't run with talk radios tabloid stories about Obama. Why can't the Conservatives understand McCain is the nominee and not Hillary. No matter how many times a day Obama gets attacked, his base just gets stronger. Why? It's Conservatives doing the attacking. Where is it written in terms where Conservatives can understand, that Democrats aren't about to abandon their candidate because of what the Conservatives says about them. The voters, the Super Delegates, the elders of the Democrat party, and the paper boy all want Obama. After being redirected back to the question and forced to answer, Hillary even admitted Obama was electable. Obama can't be held accountable for every person who has had evil thoughts or has done evil things. It's time to stop doing what got Hillary in hot water in the first place. Using the over active imagination.

actually
It sounds like Obama and Hillary have a lot of the same friends from the 60's. If we had Romney for our candidate now, the election would be a shoo-in, instead we have a mentally unbalanced individual running against a socialist and a black separatist.

Yawn
Boring.

How dare anyone ask a difficult question
of the Messiah. His next book will be "The audacity of Rope-a-dope".
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.