The White House Really Doesn't Want to Talk About Biden's Past Record on...
CBS News Goes Soft on Terror, Disney Unconcerned With Profits, and CNN Sees...
Felonies on the New York City Subways Surged Compared to 2021
Critics Notice Something Weird About Vindman's Tweet. Musk Responds.
Elon Musk Says Apple 'Threatened to Withhold Twitter' From App Store
Ron Klain Taking It Up a Notch With Gaslighting the American People in...
It’s Time to Escalate
'Our City Is in Peril': Portland Store Forced to Close Over Rampant Crime
GOP Rep: We're Not Going to Have a Rail Strike
Elon Musk Tweeted a Meme About CNN...Then They Melted Down
Apple Again Comes to Aid of Chinese Communist Party Amid Protests
Woke Tales II: SF Fires its Popular, Competent Elections Administrator. Can You Guess...
Your Midterm Campaign Donations Might Not Have Gone Where You Thought
Teen Confesses on Instagram to Murdering Another Child, Police Say
Top House Democrat Compares Buying Firearms to Buying Slaves
Tipsheet

Legal A-Team on the Field for SCOTUS Religious Liberty Case

Guest post from Ken Klukowski

The first round of briefs has now been filed in the pending religious liberty case Christian Legal Society v. Martinez. This is shaping up to be a big case that everyone should focus on come April.

The case is about religious discrimination. The Christian Legal Society (CLS) requires that its campus leaders be … Christian. Seems like a no-brainer. But not to a modern liberal school like University of California at Hastings. UC denied CLS recognition because the school declared that excluding non-Christians from the leadership of this Christian organization amounted to discrimination in violation of school rules.

This is of course ludicrous. No one would deny that a black student association can limit its leadership to African-Americans, or a women’s group to women, or an Islamic group to Muslims.

CLS filed suit, where they lost on appeal before the Ninth Circuit federal court (no surprise there). Now it’s gone to the Supreme Court.

What’s truly noteworthy at this point is that CLS is now being represented by Michael McConnell, who is a former federal appeals judge, a top law professor at Stanford (and previously University of Chicago, before he was appointed to the Tenth Circuit appeals court). McConnell might be the single most-brilliant religious liberty scholar out there today. If anyone can put forward the right argument for this case, it’s McConnell.

Also interesting is that sixteen organizations joined an amicus brief involving former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, who is one of the most successful and capable Supreme Court lawyers alive.

Between McConnell and Clement, the A-Team is on the field for this case, fighting for religious liberty. This case was already worth watching just because of the issue. With this team, it’s definitely the biggest religious liberty case in five years.

It hasn’t been scheduled for argument yet, but will definitely be set for the third or fourth week in April, with a decision likely to come down in late June.

Ken Klukowski is a fellow and senior legal analyst with the American Civil Rights Union, and covers the U.S. Supreme Court for Townhall.com.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Video