CBP and ICE Chiefs Faced Off Against Unhinged Dems...and Some Said the Quiet...
Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has Been Telling Some Weird Lies About His Ancestor and...
DOJ Charges Two Men in $120 Million Adult Day Care Fraud Scheme
This GOP Governor Just Shot Down a Bill That Would Have Banned Biological...
This Is How Mike Johnson Will Stop Lawmakers From Challenging Trump's Tariffs
National Nurses Union Calls for the Abolition of ICE
While Her Senate Rivals Campaign Statewide, Haley Stevens Hides From Voters
Wisconsin High School Is Hosting a Drag Show. Guess Who's Participating.
Delaware Smacked Down for Trying to Enforce Law, Ignoring Injunction
Dow 50,000: A Supply-Side Miracle
Mike Johnson Blasts Mamdani's DOH for Creating a ‘Global Oppression’ Group Focused on...
Kentucky Senate Candidate Andy Barr Endorses Pro-Amnesty Book Despite Pledging to Be ‘Amer...
Even Jimmy Kimmel Is Mocking the Left for Their Sudden Love of Bad...
Ken Paxton Notches Immigration Win As Premier Community for Illegals Pays Out $68...
This Congressman's Inquiry Into Bad Bunny's Explicit Performance Has the Libs Screaming
Tipsheet

Legal A-Team on the Field for SCOTUS Religious Liberty Case

Guest post from Ken Klukowski

The first round of briefs has now been filed in the pending religious liberty case Christian Legal Society v. Martinez. This is shaping up to be a big case that everyone should focus on come April.

Advertisement

The case is about religious discrimination. The Christian Legal Society (CLS) requires that its campus leaders be … Christian. Seems like a no-brainer. But not to a modern liberal school like University of California at Hastings. UC denied CLS recognition because the school declared that excluding non-Christians from the leadership of this Christian organization amounted to discrimination in violation of school rules.

This is of course ludicrous. No one would deny that a black student association can limit its leadership to African-Americans, or a women’s group to women, or an Islamic group to Muslims.

CLS filed suit, where they lost on appeal before the Ninth Circuit federal court (no surprise there). Now it’s gone to the Supreme Court.

What’s truly noteworthy at this point is that CLS is now being represented by Michael McConnell, who is a former federal appeals judge, a top law professor at Stanford (and previously University of Chicago, before he was appointed to the Tenth Circuit appeals court). McConnell might be the single most-brilliant religious liberty scholar out there today. If anyone can put forward the right argument for this case, it’s McConnell.

Advertisement

Related:

CONSTITUTION

Also interesting is that sixteen organizations joined an amicus brief involving former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, who is one of the most successful and capable Supreme Court lawyers alive.

Between McConnell and Clement, the A-Team is on the field for this case, fighting for religious liberty. This case was already worth watching just because of the issue. With this team, it’s definitely the biggest religious liberty case in five years.

It hasn’t been scheduled for argument yet, but will definitely be set for the third or fourth week in April, with a decision likely to come down in late June.

Ken Klukowski is a fellow and senior legal analyst with the American Civil Rights Union, and covers the U.S. Supreme Court for Townhall.com.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos