It’s Their Own Fault We No Longer Default to Respect
There Was a Horrific School Shooting in Canada...and Their Police Used a Weird...
Person of Interest Arrested in Connection to the Abduction of Nancy Guthrie
Fraud Nation
Technological Sweet Spot
Public Opinion: A Tyrant Against Hard Decisions
Peggy Noonan Loses Her Noodle Over Washington Post Layoffs
Misconduct Rampant: America’s Leaders Increasingly Prioritize Agendas Over Fairness, Laws
Pass the SAVE America Act
Trump's DOJ Seeks Justice for Victims of Benghazi
2026 Olympics: Let’s Talk About Crotch Scandals
The Washington Post Is Paying the Bill for Free Speech
Republicans Siding With Big Banks in Stablecoin Fight Could Tank Trump’s Affordability Age...
Freezing Deaths, Garbage Piles in Largest Sanctuary City
Woke DC Grand Jury Denies Indictments of Six Democrats Accused of Sedition
Tipsheet

SCOTUS Throws Out Michigan Lawsuit Challenging Republican Drawn Congressional Districts

The United States Supreme Court threw out a lawsuit challenging Michigan congressional maps drawn by state Republicans. 

According to NBC News, "Monday's ruling came in a lawsuit filed after Republicans redrew the political boundary lines after the 2010 census. Democrats claimed that the new plan would perpetuate Republican control by preventing Democrats from forming majorities."

Advertisement

In April, a lower court judge ruled the maps to be unconstitutional gerrymandering. However, SCOTUS stayed the case as it heard two other cases dealing with gerrymandering in Maryland and North Carolina. In June, the court ruled that federal courts should play no role in gerrymandering cases. Today, it dismissed the case entirely. Thus, the GOP drawn state and congressional maps in Michigan can stay. 

Liberals, for their part, reacted to news by declaring SCOTUS to be a "partisan hack." 

The group, "Voters, Not Politicians," behind the lawsuit harshly condemned SCOTUS in a statement, saying, "The public now knows what happens behind closed doors when politicians and special interests have the power to manipulate election district maps for partisan political gain," she said. "The U.S. Supreme Court’s unwillingness to protect voters from extreme partisan gerrymandering underscores the importance of citizen-led initiatives (to determine how political lines are drawn)."

Advertisement

Related:

SCOTUS

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement