Excuse Me, Our Diplomats Were Ambushed in Iraq by Iran-Backed Militias?
Wait, More Women Have Accused Eric Swalwell of Sexual Misconduct?
It’s ‘Shoot the Messenger Week’ As Jen Psaki Slams Local Media Holding a...
AI: A Blessing or a Disaster in the Making?
Oil, Faith, and Freedom: Lifting Latin Americans Out of Poverty
Rules for Radicals Turns 55: Division Without Deliverance
Red States Prove Lower Energy Costs Start With Expanding Domestic Supply – From...
Words, War, and the Bully Pulpit
Immigration Won’t Fix America’s Marriage and Baby Bust
DOJ Reaches Settlement in Landmark Case Over Biden-Era Government Censorship of Americans
Chinese Researcher Sentenced to Prison for Smuggling E. coli DNA into U.S.
Welcome Home: Artemis II Astronauts Return After Historic Moon Orbit
Trump: 'No Nuclear Weapon' Is 99 Percent of Iran Deal Talks
Disgruntled Worker Charged with Arson After Allegedly Burning Down $500M Warehouse Over Pa...
Ex-Staffer Says That Rep. Eric Swalwell Sexually Assaulted Her
Tipsheet

SCOTUS Throws Out Michigan Lawsuit Challenging Republican Drawn Congressional Districts

SCOTUS Throws Out Michigan Lawsuit Challenging Republican Drawn Congressional Districts

The United States Supreme Court threw out a lawsuit challenging Michigan congressional maps drawn by state Republicans. 

According to NBC News, "Monday's ruling came in a lawsuit filed after Republicans redrew the political boundary lines after the 2010 census. Democrats claimed that the new plan would perpetuate Republican control by preventing Democrats from forming majorities."

Advertisement

In April, a lower court judge ruled the maps to be unconstitutional gerrymandering. However, SCOTUS stayed the case as it heard two other cases dealing with gerrymandering in Maryland and North Carolina. In June, the court ruled that federal courts should play no role in gerrymandering cases. Today, it dismissed the case entirely. Thus, the GOP drawn state and congressional maps in Michigan can stay. 

Liberals, for their part, reacted to news by declaring SCOTUS to be a "partisan hack." 

The group, "Voters, Not Politicians," behind the lawsuit harshly condemned SCOTUS in a statement, saying, "The public now knows what happens behind closed doors when politicians and special interests have the power to manipulate election district maps for partisan political gain," she said. "The U.S. Supreme Court’s unwillingness to protect voters from extreme partisan gerrymandering underscores the importance of citizen-led initiatives (to determine how political lines are drawn)."

Advertisement

Related:

SCOTUS

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement