Here's What Led to That SLIGHT Uptick in the Inflation Report. Everyone Simmer...
Mike Johnson Wants Ghislaine Maxwell to Testify About Epstein List
WATCH: Police Footage Shows Arrest of Democrat State Lawmaker Who Burglarized Stepmother's...
These Gun Rights Groups Slapped a 'Big Beautiful Lawsuit' on the Government That...
Trump's Most Aggressive Immigration Policy Yet Just Dropped
NBC's Weak Defense of Biden's Autopen Scandal Shows How Desperate Democrats Have Become
Trump Targets UN Over Anti-Israel Bias—Commission Resigns in Wake
Rhode Island Democrat Smears ICE As ‘Nazi Gestapo Thugs’ for Arresting Illegal Alien
Trump Issues Ultimatum, Russia Yawns, EU Whines — Trump Fires Back
Cuomo Under Fire: Rivals Pile on As Former Governor Re-Enters the Race
Dershowitz Says Trump Administration Is Not Hiding Epstein Files. Here's Who He Says...
How Melania Pushed Trump to Get Tough on Putin
Trump Champions Second Industrial Revolution in Pittsburgh
Bill Introduced to Designate Muslim Brotherhood a Terror Group
Epstein’s Former Cell Mate Shares His Thoughts on the ‘Suicide’ Narrative
Tipsheet

TIME Declares Climate Change Settled Science, Refuses To Publish Global Warming Skeptics

AP Photo/Vincent Yu

TIME magazine, the self-appointed arbiter of truth and goodness, wants you to know that the science is settled on climate change (formerly known as global warming until a few predictions by Al Gore didn't pan out). In an upcoming issue that is dramatically titled, 2050: The Fight For Earth, leftists at the imprint sound the alarms that time is running out for our planet. But, as Editor-in-Chief and CEO of TIME Edward Felsenthal brags, the publication does not include any opposing viewpoints. That means you will find no stories whatsoever that disagree with climate change in their latest issue.

Advertisement

Here's why Felsenthal says that climate change skeptics are not included:

Notably, what you will not find in this issue are climate-change skeptics. Core to our mission is bringing together diverse perspectives. Experts can and should debate the best route to mitigating the effects of climate change, but there is no serious doubt that those effects are real. We are witnessing them right in front of us. The science on global warming is settled. There isn’t another side, and there isn’t another moment.

Well, if TIME will not publish climate change skeptics, Townhall will. In a column from June 2019, Vijay Jayaraj explains why the "endless failure of climate doomsday tales" should be taken "with a pinch of salt."

On June 29, 2017, the Dailymail in UK ran an article headlined “Four years to save the Earth: 2020 is the deadline to avert climate catastrophe, experts claim in chilling commentary.”

Two years later and halfway to deadline, the earth has not changed much. If anything, the El Niño of the 2016-17 season gave way for much cooler temperatures across the globe and the past two years have been colder than 2016.

This is just one of the many climate doomsday news articles that gets published in our mainstream news media every single day.

How seriously should we treat the climate doomsday claims?

Advertisement

Jayaraj goes on to detail several failed predictions of melting ice caps and increased tornadoes that never happened. Jayaraj notes that climate change articles, arguably like the ones found in TIME, should be met with judgement. Why? "Neither are they scientifically accurate nor are they put through rigorous scrutiny before being disseminated to the masses.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement