It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Tipsheet

Alaska Union Asks State To Ignore Constitution, Violate First Amendment Rights

Alaska Union Asks State To Ignore Constitution, Violate First Amendment Rights
AP Photo/Al Grillo, File

The Inland Boatmen’s Union is demanding that Alaska violate the First Amendment for state-ferry workers by forcing all employees to pay mandated union fees, regardless of membership. The Supreme Court ruled last year that this sort of job requiement was unconstitutional and forced political speech. 

Advertisement

MustReadAlaska.com reports that the union representing hundreds of government-contracted ferry employees is currently negotiating contracts with the State of Alaska. The IBU rejected the government's most recent proposal and demanded "an exemption to the Janus ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court, which affirmed that workers have a right to join or not join a union." 

SCOTUS's 2018 ruling in Janus v. AFSCME declared that the First Amendment barred forced union dues and fees of any kind for government unions and employees. Unions often demand monopoly contracts and then force government workers to pay union officials as part of a job requirement. 

The court said that forcing somebody to pay money towards a union which would negotiate with the government was inherently compelled political speech, which is against the law.  As Suzanne Downing summarizes, if the IBU got their way "such an exemption would illegally force worker to become members of the union and force the State to be responsible for collecting the dues for the union." 

The state ferry system services more than 30 coastal towns, and is crucial to Alaska's summer tourist business. IBU members have been striking for the past seven days.

"On Aug. 1, members of the Inland Boatmen’s Union will lose their health insurance benefits and they’ll also be heading into more weeks without pay," Downing adds.

Advertisement

Related:

ALASKA

The union demands more money for its members, paid for from a specific state fund. The government says that they cannot use that fund for IBU members. It is unclear how the two sides will find an agreement. But as pointed out by the National Right to Work Foundation, the group who provided attorneys for Illinois' government employees Mark Janus in Janus v. AFSCME, the demand that the state simply provides an exemption for IBU is unconstitutional. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement