The Investigation Into Gavin Newsom Is Some Serious Karma
Vice President JD Vance Appeared on The View. Here's What Happened.
You'll Never Guess Why This Guy Burned a Cross in a Chicago Park
This Top SPLC Official Funneled Over $1 Million to Her Neo-Nazi Lover
Iranian Dissidents Make Passionate Appeal to President Trump
You'll Laugh Your Head Off When You Find Out How Trump Will Keep...
Disgraced Judge Hannah Dugan's Motion to Escape Justice Is Denied
Even Democrats Are Calling This Vegan-Backed Oregon Ballot Initiative 'Extreme'
Iran Will Be Allowed to Immediately Resume Selling Its Oil Under Latest Deal,...
The RNC Responds After 'Decoy' Dan Sullivan Is Removed From Alaska Ballot
We Have More Details on the UFC Freedom 250 Terror Plot
How a Calmer Border Is Helping Better Fight New World Screwworm
Gay Adoptive Fathers Found Guilty of Sexually Abusing, Murdering 13-Month-Old Baby Boy
Hillary Clinton Torches Biden Over 'Terrible Mistake' During 2024 Election
What Vance's Next Anti-Fraud Event Reveals About the Midterms
Tipsheet

Feminists Battle Transgenders in U.K. vs U.N. Brouhaha

Feminists Battle Transgenders in U.K. vs U.N. Brouhaha

There is a kerfuffle in the United Kingdom that pits feminists against trans-people, and it all deals with whether or not the United Nations is being inclusive enough by labeling mothers as “pregnant women.” 

Advertisement

Recently, Britain proposed amendments to the United Nation’s International Covenant on Civil and Political rights that would change the clause that says “pregnant women” should be protected to “pregnant people” should be protected.  The British government fears that not changing the term to an all inclusive one will “exclude transgender people who have given birth.” In other words, it will neglect to protect women who identify as men that are pregnant. 

But feminists argue that this move is simply the transgender movement extending and embracing the patriarchal society and further removing women from the conversation.

Leading feminist writer  Sarah Ditum heavily criticized the move, “This isn’t inclusion. This is making women unmentionable. Having a female body and knowing what that means for reproduction doesn’t make you ‘exclusionary’. Forcing us to decorously scrub out any reference to our sex on pain of being called bigots is an insult.”

This actually highlights a growing problem on the left between feminists and transgender activists. Feminists take offense to the transgender’s movement desire to remove all gender form the public sphere because it, well, removes women from the public sphere as well.

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSGENDER WOMEN

Earlier this year, a fight actually broke out at a skirmish between feminist leaders and transgenders leaders. Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists (TERFs) is a British group that believes trans-women are not actually women and therefor should not be given the same legal protections as actual women. At a rally, that group got in a fist fight with trans-activists who opposed their mission.

But the desire by the British to change the U.N. Treaty seems rather silly, there have been only two known cases in the United Kingdom where children are born to women who transitioned to men but kept their reproductive organs.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos