How My 2025 Predictions Went – and Some Predictions for 2026
While America Watched the Border, the Cyber Front Exploded
Let’s All Hope 2026 Brings Us Some Real ‘News’ Outlets
If Elected CA Governor, Eric Swalwell Vows to Weaponize Government Against ICE Agents
'Just Fine:' WI Governor Tony Evers Continues to Withhold SNAP Data From the...
With Islam on the Rise, Gay European Voters Shift to the Right
Yeah, Culture Does Matter
Obamacare Was, Is and Will Always Be a Problem
Oligarchies, Terrorism, Greed, and Other Obstacles to Forecasting the Future
Minnesota’s Fraud Is Blowing the Lid Off a Broken Election System
The Danger of Nick Fuentes' Ideology
Will the US Senate Stall Much-Needed Permitting Reforms?
Video of Woman Saying 'Fraud Is Bad' Fuels Scrutiny of Minnesota Childcare Program
Former Real Estate Professional Convicted in $2.4M Investor Fraud Scheme
New Media Shine While Legacy Media Die
Tipsheet

House Intel Chairman Faces Inquiry for Ominous Security Warning

AP Photo/Efrem Lukatsky

There's new fallout from this week's vague and ominous national security warning from House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) Chairman Mike Turner (R-OH) that subsequently saw Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) rush to reassure Americans there was no need for "public alarm" and turned out to be, as Vespa reported, Russia's apparent ability to use a nuke to neutralize American satellites in orbit.

Advertisement

On Thursday, Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN), fired off a letter to Speaker Johnson accusing Turner of "reckless disregard" and requesting an inquiry into "any impact" the intel committee chairman's national security warning had on U.S. policy.

"[T]he Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence revealed to the American people an imminent and perhaps existential threat to the United States of America," Ogles said of Turner's action that set off a firestorm of concern and questions on Wednesday. 

"This revelation by the Chairman was done with a reckless disregard of the implications and consequences said information would have on geopolitics, domestic and foreign markets, or the well-being and psyche of the American people," Ogles' letter continued. "In hindsight, it has become clear that the intent was not to ensure the safety of our homeland and the American people, but rather to ensure additional funding for Ukraine and passage of an unreformed Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). This act constituted poor judgement at a minimum and a complete breach of trust influenced by the pursuit of a political agenda at a maximum," emphasized Ogles. 

Advertisement

As a consequence, Ogles said it was "with great reticence" that he decided to "formally request an inquiry as to any impact the Chairman's statements may have had on U.S. foreign and domestic policy. Furthermore, as the Chairman of the Select Committee on Intelligence is solely appointed by the Speaker and under your direct purview, should the Chairman retain his post, you have a duty and an obligation to reassure this body (Congress) and the American people that the processes of the Intelligence Committee have not been corrupted by the very institutions they are charged with monitoring," Ogles wrote to Johnson. 

"Congress has a Constitutional obligation to conduct oversight, enshrined by the Founders of our nation," Ogles concluded. "Now is the time to act."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement