It’s Hard To Care About Democrats at All Anymore
In a State Rife With Fraud, This Is What Dems Focus on
You Won't Believe How This WaPo Columnist Wants to Reduce Gun Deaths
The Politicization of Motherhood
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 318: What the Bible Says About Blood –...
New Group Aims to Clear Path for Microschools, Church-Based Schools As Choice Movement...
The Radioactive Jew
The Only Real Cure for Political Violence
Watch This Amazing Interview With the Hero Principal Who Stopped a School Shooting
Here's Why This U.S. Senate Candidate Got Arrested For Threatening Trump
Two American Service Members Go Missing During Military Exercise in Morocco
America Needs the Bible
Counties, Not Capitals: The NPVIC Threat and the Case for a Real Electoral...
Sacred Ground, Secular Safety: Why the Holy Sepulchre Needs a Shelter Now
'Lights, Camera, Smuggle': Fake Movie Biz Used to Traffic Pakistanis Into America
Tipsheet

House Intel Chairman Faces Inquiry for Ominous Security Warning

House Intel Chairman Faces Inquiry for Ominous Security Warning
AP Photo/Efrem Lukatsky

There's new fallout from this week's vague and ominous national security warning from House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) Chairman Mike Turner (R-OH) that subsequently saw Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) rush to reassure Americans there was no need for "public alarm" and turned out to be, as Vespa reported, Russia's apparent ability to use a nuke to neutralize American satellites in orbit.

Advertisement

On Thursday, Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN), fired off a letter to Speaker Johnson accusing Turner of "reckless disregard" and requesting an inquiry into "any impact" the intel committee chairman's national security warning had on U.S. policy.

"[T]he Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence revealed to the American people an imminent and perhaps existential threat to the United States of America," Ogles said of Turner's action that set off a firestorm of concern and questions on Wednesday. 

"This revelation by the Chairman was done with a reckless disregard of the implications and consequences said information would have on geopolitics, domestic and foreign markets, or the well-being and psyche of the American people," Ogles' letter continued. "In hindsight, it has become clear that the intent was not to ensure the safety of our homeland and the American people, but rather to ensure additional funding for Ukraine and passage of an unreformed Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). This act constituted poor judgement at a minimum and a complete breach of trust influenced by the pursuit of a political agenda at a maximum," emphasized Ogles. 

Advertisement

As a consequence, Ogles said it was "with great reticence" that he decided to "formally request an inquiry as to any impact the Chairman's statements may have had on U.S. foreign and domestic policy. Furthermore, as the Chairman of the Select Committee on Intelligence is solely appointed by the Speaker and under your direct purview, should the Chairman retain his post, you have a duty and an obligation to reassure this body (Congress) and the American people that the processes of the Intelligence Committee have not been corrupted by the very institutions they are charged with monitoring," Ogles wrote to Johnson. 

"Congress has a Constitutional obligation to conduct oversight, enshrined by the Founders of our nation," Ogles concluded. "Now is the time to act."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement