Why Again Do We Still Have a Special Relationship With the Tyrannical UK?
Remember Those Two Jordanians Who Tried to Infiltrate a Marine Corps Base? Well…
Is There Trouble Ahead for Pete Hegseth?
Celebrate Diversity (Or Else)!
Journos Now Believe the Liar Trump When Convenient, and Did Newsweek Provide the...
To Vet or Not to Vet
Trump: From 'Fascist' to 'Let's Do Lunch'
Newton's Third Law of Politics
Religious Belief and the 2024 Election
Restoring American Strength and Security with Trump’s Cabinet Picks
Linda McMahon to Education May Choke Foreign Influence Operations on Campus
Unburden Us From the Universities
Watch Jasmine Crockett Go On Rant About White People Over the Abolishment of...
Texas Hands Over Massive Plot of Land to Trump for Deportations
Scott Jennings Offers Telling Points on Democrats' Losses With Young Men
Tipsheet

Biden Orders 'Lowest Possible Retaliation' Against Iranian Facilities for Attacks on U.S. Troops

AP Photo/Susan Walsh

The Pentagon announced on Thursday night that "self-defense" strikes approved by President Biden against Iranian facilities reportedly used by its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and affiliated militias in Syria were carried out, finally showing some response to recent attacks targeting U.S. forces in the Middle East. 

Advertisement

As Townhall reported earlier, the Pentagon said U.S. forces in the Middle East had been targeted in drone and rocket attacks at least 13 times over the previous week, injuring dozens of Americans and leading the death of at least one contractor who died of a heart attack while scrambling to find shelter.

Richard Goldberg, a senior advisor to the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), noted on X, formerly Twitter, that the U.S. strikes against IRGC targets in Syria were "[l]ong overdue" and urged awaiting more details on who and what exactly got hit in the strike before heaping too much praise on the strikes. 

As of now, any damage assessments following the U.S. strikes have not been made public.

Noting how long it took for action to happen, one of the details Goldberg is looking to learn is whether the U.S. waited for any IRGC personnel who may have been at the targets to safely depart — a significant question. 

Advertisement

Goldberg also pointed to the fact that the low bar set by the Biden administration in recent similar retaliations means many people were "hyping the lowest possible retaliation after a week of waiting" for action from the U.S. "Let's look at the chess board from Tehran, not Washington," he added. 

In the Biden administration's statement on the strikes, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin noted that "Iran wants to hide its hand and deny its role in these attacks against our forces," pledging the U.S. "will not let them." 

"If attacks by Iran’s proxies against U.S. forces continue, we will not hesitate to take further necessary measures to protect our people," Sec. Austin promised. If that's the administration's position, however, why hasn't that logic been applied to other Iran-backed attacks? That's another question posed by Goldberg as we await more information on what was taken out by the strikes announced Thursday night. 

Advertisement

Whatever the toll of the U.S. attacks on IRGC facilities in Syria, Goldberg is right: the attempts to view and treat Iran-backed Hamas barbarians differently than other Iran-backed groups carrying out attacks is not a distinction that can last much longer. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement