With Details About Rob Reiner's Son Coming to Light, It Seems This Situation...
FBI Releases New Images of the Suspect in the Brown University Shooting
It's About Time: Trump Has Designated This a Weapon of Mass Destruction
If These Three Words Dominate a News Presser, You Shouldn't Go on Television
Australia's Prime Minister Vows More Gun Restrictions After Terrorist Attack
The Trial of Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan Started Today. Here's the Day One...
From Anxiety to Alignment: What This Week’s Data Tells Us About the Right’s...
Candace Owens Faces Erika Kirk After Months of Promoting Theories About Charlie Kirk’s...
President Trump Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Against the BBC for Edited Jan. 6...
Jake Tapper Says He’s Extra Tough on Trump to Make Up For Failing...
Progressive Podcast Host Says Charlie Kirk 'Justified' His Death Because He Supported Gun...
This Actress Had an Insane Meltdown Over Trump Calling a Reporter 'Piggy'
Sen. John Kennedy Mocks Jasmine Crockett’s Senate Bid: ‘The Voices in Her Head...
Chile Elects Trump-Style Conservative José Antonio Kast as President
Rabbi Killed in Antisemitic Terror Attack Had His Warnings Ignored by the Australian...
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Dismisses Hunter's Tax Charges...but There's a Catch

AP Photo/Julio Cortez

Federal tax charges against Hunter Biden were dismissed by judge Maryellen Noreika on Thursday, but the ruling doesn't mean a lasting reprieve for the son of President Joe Biden. Soon, Hunter is expected to be slapped with the same — or potentially new charges — in a different district in the days ahead.

Advertisement

According to NBC News, the decision from Judge Noreika "had been expected" after the sweetheart plea deal for the First Son fell apart under the most basic of scrutinizing questions from the judge.

It turns out that, due to the unexpected failure of the plea agreement, there are now "venue problems" that wouldn't have arisen if Hunter had plead guilty to receive his slap on the wrist from federal prosecutors as planned. 

The court order dismissing the charges explained:

WHEREAS, the United States has represented that venue for the offenses that are the subject of the information filed in the above-captioned matter "does not lie in Delaware"...

WHEREAS, the United States has moved "to voluntarily dismiss the information filed in the above-captioned matter without prejudice so that the United States can bring tax charges in a district where venue lies"...

WHEREAS, Defendant does not oppose the United States' motion...

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States' motion to dismiss...is GRANTED. The information in the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED without prejudice. 

Advertisement

Related:

HUNTER BIDEN

Since Hunter was forced to enter a not guilty plea, there's now set to be a trial afoot when charges are refiled. Prosecutors in the case, NBC News reported, have indicated they are "most likely" to charge Hunter in California or Washington, D.C. as Weiss had requested in 2022 before having those attempts denied by others within the Justice Department. 

Now, Hunter and his legal team will have to wait and see what and where charges are filed. One attorney for Hunter seemed to be concerned that new or additional charges could be filed following the collapse of the sweetheart plea agreement. In an interview with MSNBC's "Morning Joe," the attorney appeared to lay the groundwork to argue that any additional charges — now that Hunter's apparent protection from serious consequences has been pierced — would mean "something other than the facts or the law...has been infecting the process."

More on where things stand with Hunter's developing legal woes via NBC News' report:

The judge has not ruled on an issue involving the separate gun charge, a felony alleging Biden illegally owned a Colt Cobra .38 Special handgun during a period when he was using drugs. Under the terms of the scuttled plea deal, the charge would have been dropped in two years had Biden honored the terms of a diversion agreement with prosecutors.

Biden's attorneys said last week they consider that deal — which included a passage protecting him from some other possible charges — was still in effect because both sides had signed it.

Prosecutors say the deal was not in effect, because the agreement also needed to be signed off on by the probation office and it had not been.

One of Biden's lawyers, Chris Clark, moved to withdraw from the case during the back and forth, saying he expected to be called as a witness in the dispute. Noreika signed off on his withdrawal in a separate order late Thursday.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos