The Lib Narrative About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting Took Another Brutal Hit
Anti-ICE Protesters Try to Shame an Agent — It Backfires Spectacularly
For the Trans Activist Class, It’s All About Them
Ilhan Omar Claims ICE Isn’t Arresting Criminals. Here's Proof That She's Lying.
Check Out President Trump's 'Appropriate and Unambiguous' Response to Heckler
The Prime of Tough-Guy Progressivism
'The Constitution of a Deity' RFK Jr. on President Trump's Diet
Father-in-Law of Renee Good Refuses to Blame ICE, Urges Americans to Turn to...
Iranian State Media Airs a Direct Assassination Threat Against President Trump
US Halts Immigrant Visas From 75 Countries Over Welfare Abuse Concerns
Living Through Iran’s Slaughter: One Iranian Woman Describes the Horror and Hope Under...
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Shrugs Off Assaults on ICE Agents: They Are Standing...
Tricia McLaughlin Defends ICE's Visible Presence
Founder of LGBTQ+ Nonprofit Casa Ruby Sentenced in Federal Fraud Case
DC Rapper 'Taliban Glizzy' Sentenced to Over 18 Years for Multi-State Jewelry Heists
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Dismisses Hunter's Tax Charges...but There's a Catch

AP Photo/Julio Cortez

Federal tax charges against Hunter Biden were dismissed by judge Maryellen Noreika on Thursday, but the ruling doesn't mean a lasting reprieve for the son of President Joe Biden. Soon, Hunter is expected to be slapped with the same — or potentially new charges — in a different district in the days ahead.

Advertisement

According to NBC News, the decision from Judge Noreika "had been expected" after the sweetheart plea deal for the First Son fell apart under the most basic of scrutinizing questions from the judge.

It turns out that, due to the unexpected failure of the plea agreement, there are now "venue problems" that wouldn't have arisen if Hunter had plead guilty to receive his slap on the wrist from federal prosecutors as planned. 

The court order dismissing the charges explained:

WHEREAS, the United States has represented that venue for the offenses that are the subject of the information filed in the above-captioned matter "does not lie in Delaware"...

WHEREAS, the United States has moved "to voluntarily dismiss the information filed in the above-captioned matter without prejudice so that the United States can bring tax charges in a district where venue lies"...

WHEREAS, Defendant does not oppose the United States' motion...

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States' motion to dismiss...is GRANTED. The information in the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED without prejudice. 

Advertisement

Related:

HUNTER BIDEN

Since Hunter was forced to enter a not guilty plea, there's now set to be a trial afoot when charges are refiled. Prosecutors in the case, NBC News reported, have indicated they are "most likely" to charge Hunter in California or Washington, D.C. as Weiss had requested in 2022 before having those attempts denied by others within the Justice Department. 

Now, Hunter and his legal team will have to wait and see what and where charges are filed. One attorney for Hunter seemed to be concerned that new or additional charges could be filed following the collapse of the sweetheart plea agreement. In an interview with MSNBC's "Morning Joe," the attorney appeared to lay the groundwork to argue that any additional charges — now that Hunter's apparent protection from serious consequences has been pierced — would mean "something other than the facts or the law...has been infecting the process."

More on where things stand with Hunter's developing legal woes via NBC News' report:

The judge has not ruled on an issue involving the separate gun charge, a felony alleging Biden illegally owned a Colt Cobra .38 Special handgun during a period when he was using drugs. Under the terms of the scuttled plea deal, the charge would have been dropped in two years had Biden honored the terms of a diversion agreement with prosecutors.

Biden's attorneys said last week they consider that deal — which included a passage protecting him from some other possible charges — was still in effect because both sides had signed it.

Prosecutors say the deal was not in effect, because the agreement also needed to be signed off on by the probation office and it had not been.

One of Biden's lawyers, Chris Clark, moved to withdraw from the case during the back and forth, saying he expected to be called as a witness in the dispute. Noreika signed off on his withdrawal in a separate order late Thursday.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement