Why Do They Try to Make Bad Things Cool?
Did You Miss This Story About Alleged Medicaid Fraud From a Somali-Run Health...
A YouTuber's Follow-Up Video on Minnesota Fraud Is Just as Wild
Watch What Happens When a Journalist Confronts an Arizona State Professor About Her...
Of Course, the Washington Post Was All Over This Story About an Ex-Policeman's...
Did You Miss Harmeet Dhillon Body Slamming This Anti-Trump Republican?
Venezuela Is a Win for America, a Loss for Canada
In Honor of January 6, Gavin Newsom Reminds Everyone He's an Election Denier
Women Beware the 'Judgement-Free Zone'
U.S. Forces Seized Russian Shadow Fleet Tanker in Atlantic, Hegseth Says Sanctions Remain...
Newsom Tries to Take Credit for L.A. Fire Cleanup. There's Just One Problem.
Leftists in Oregon Want Segregated Swimming Pools
Venezuela: It All Depends on the Meaning of the Word 'Run'
The Dividends of Operation Absolute Resolve
If the President Doesn’t Run a Bureaucracy, No One Does. That’s Authoritarianism.
Tipsheet

One Democrat's Attempt to Smear 'Twitter Files' Journalists Completely Backfired

AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

Independent journalist Matt Taibbi and author Michael Shellenberger, two of the individuals who've released installments of the "Twitter Files" in the months since Elon Musk took control of the social media company, did not receive a warm welcome from Democrats on Capitol Hill on Thursday when they arrived to testify about their findings about Twitter's inner workings before the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government. 

Advertisement

Stacey Plaskett, the delegate to Congress representing the U.S. Virgin Islands, serves as the ranking member on the subcommittee, and failed to hide her disdain for the work Taibbi and Shellenberger have done to shine a light on the biased past actions of Twitter.

"This isn't just a matter of what data was given to these so-called journalists before us now," Plaskett said in her opening remarks, a lazy attempt at smearing the experience and credibility of the two writers before her. "There are many legitimate questions about where Musk got the financing to purchase Twitter," she added before diving into unfounded claims about how Musk — then the world's richest man — paid for Twitter. Sure, Stacey. 

After displaying her own lack of professionalism, Plaskett was corrected by Taibbi about his credentials that make him much more than a "so-called journalist."

"My name is Matt Taibbi, I've been a reporter for 30 years, I'm a staunch advocate of the First Amendment. Much of that time was spent at Rolling Stone Magazine," he explained in his opening comments before turning to address Plaskett's smear.

"Ranking Member Plaskett, I'm not a 'so-called journalist,'" Taibbi explained. "I've won the National Magazine Award, the I.F. Stone Award for Independent Journalism, and I've written ten books — including four New York Times bestsellers."

Well, that should set both the record and Plaskett straight.     

Advertisement

Related:

BIG TECH

Perhaps the sweetest irony of Plaskett engaging in name calling based on her partisan bias is that she is something of a "so-called" congresswoman herself. Since she's a delegate to — and not a member of— Congress, she doesn't enjoy the full privileges of being in the House, such as the ability to vote on legislation before the full body. It does not, unfortunately, mean that she's prevented from spreading falsehoods about witnesses appearing before the committees on which she sits. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos